Strategies for Dealing with Drift during Implementation of ERP Systems

Research on the relationship between Information Technology (IT) and organizations emphasizes the complexity of adaptation processes and the potential of drifting. Drifting means that an organization encounters unexpected circumstances that show the incompleteness and possible failure of an initial technological design without organizations having yet feasible alternatives. This conceptual and empirical paper investigates the origins and nature of drifting, and strategies for dealing with drift. Three strategies have been proposed to deal with drifting: control, incremental, and drift containment. We explore the third option that seems most realistic and relevant from an organizational point of view. We empirically investigated how drift containment could be accomplished in practice in a multi-site ERP implementation project. Our results suggest three phases of dealing with drift. Organizations must first recognize when drifting occurs. Next, they must develop a dual focus. On one hand, they must differentiate between a project’s overarching objectives (which remain relatively stable). On the other hand, they attend to and resolve their operational drifting experience. The dual focus thus means that while organizations stay focused on their objectives, they address the causes of drifting. During the final phase, lessons learnt during drifting resolution must be shared and applied to accelerate accomplishment of project objectives. Implications for research and practice are elaborated.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  Scott A. Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq , 2001 .

[4]  Severin V. Grabski,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Enterprise System Implementation Risks and Controls , 2003 .

[5]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  The labyrinths of Information , 2002 .

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness , 2003 .

[7]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems as a technology of power: empowerment or panoptic control? , 2002, DATB.

[8]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[9]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Continuity Versus Discontinuity: Weighing the Future of ERP Packages , 2003 .

[10]  E. Waarts,et al.  The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations , 2002 .

[11]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[13]  G. Ritzer Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[14]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[15]  M. Engle Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[16]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[17]  Martin W. Bauer Resistance to new technology: ‘Technophobia’: a misleading conception of resistance to new technology , 1995 .

[18]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[19]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Larry Hirschhorn,et al.  Beyond mechanization: Work and technology in a postindustrial age , 1984 .

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Multisite ERP Implementations. , 2000 .

[22]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[23]  H DavenportThomas Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system , 1998 .

[24]  K. Lyytinen A taxonomic perspective of information systems development: theoretical constructs and recommendations , 1987 .

[25]  E. Waarts,et al.  The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations , 2002 .

[26]  L. Winner Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought , 1977 .

[27]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[28]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[29]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[30]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  ERP Systems and the Paradox of Control , 2003, AMCIS.

[31]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[33]  J. Mill A System of Logic , 1843 .

[34]  James C. Brancheau,et al.  Does an Effective Information Technology Implementation Process Guarantee Success? , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[35]  A. L. Shapiro The Control Revolution , 1999 .

[36]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[37]  Christine Räisänen,et al.  Technologizing Discourse to Standardize Projects in Multi-Project Organizations: Hegemony by Consensus? , 2004 .

[38]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[39]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[40]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Crisis and the Content of Managerial Communications: A Study of the Focus of Attention of Top Managers in Surviving and Failing Firms. , 1990 .

[41]  Scott Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq , 2002 .

[42]  Jonny Holmström,et al.  Drifting technologies and multi-purpose networks: the case of the Swedish cashcard , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[43]  Joan Antoni Pastor,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: An Annotated Bibliography , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[45]  Rosío Alvarez,et al.  Tell me a good story: using narrative analysis to examine information requirements interviews during an ERP implementation , 2002, DATB.

[46]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Successful implementation of ERP projects: Evidence from two case studies , 2002 .

[47]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[48]  Hans Moonen,et al.  Agent Technology Supports Inter-Organizational Planning in the Port , 2005 .

[49]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[50]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[51]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[52]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[54]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  A theory of information systems based on improvisation , 1999 .

[55]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[56]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[57]  Scott A. Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire , 2000 .

[58]  Ben Light,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A Framework for Understanding Success and Failure in Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation , 2003 .

[59]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[60]  R. Paul Review of "The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdoms of systems" by Claudio Ciborra, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002 , 2005 .

[61]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[62]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[63]  Rita Gunther McGrath Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[64]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[65]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[66]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Role of Learning from Failure , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.