Investigating electrical contact resistance losses in lithium-ion battery assemblies for hybrid and

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are favored in hybrid-electric vehicles and electric vehicles for their outstanding power characteristics. In this paper the energy loss due to electrical contact resistance (ECR) at the interface of electrodes and current-collector bars in Li-ion battery assemblies is investigated for the first time. ECR is a direct result of contact surface imperfections, i.e., roughness and out-of-flatness, and acts as an ohmic resistance at the electrode–collector joints. A custom-designed testbed is developed to conduct a systematic experimental study. ECR is measured at separable bolted electrode connections of a sample Li-ion battery, and a straightforward analysis to evaluate the relevant energy loss is presented. Through the experiments, it is observed that ECR is an important issue in energy management of Li-ion batteries. Effects of surface imperfection, contact pressure, joint type, collector bar material, and interfacial materials on ECR are highlighted. The obtained data show that in the considered Li-ion battery, the energy loss due to ECR can be as high as 20% of the total energy flow in and out of the battery under normal operating conditions. However, ECR loss can be reduced to 6% when proper joint pressure and/or surface treatment are used. A poor connection at the electrode–collector interface can lead to a significant battery energy loss as heat generated at the interface. Consequently, a heat flow can be initiated from the electrodes towards the internal battery structure, which results in a considerable temperature increase and onset of thermal runaway. At sever conditions, heat generation due to ECR might cause serious safety issues, sparks, and even melting of the electrodes.

[1]  Mark D. Semon,et al.  POSTUSE REVIEW: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1982 .

[2]  Paul A. Nelson,et al.  Design modeling of lithium-ion battery performance. , 2002 .

[3]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2009 .

[4]  L. Lave,et al.  Environmental Implications of Alternative-Fueled Automobiles: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tradeoffs , 2000 .

[5]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Analysis of Electrochemical and Thermal Behavior of Li-Ion Cells , 2003 .

[6]  Andreas Poullikkas,et al.  Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications , 2009 .

[7]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles , 2006 .

[8]  U. Kim,et al.  Effect of electrode configuration on the thermal behavior of a lithium-polymer battery , 2008 .

[9]  D Damico,et al.  Advances in Adhesives, Adhesion Science, and Testing , 2005 .

[10]  Bruno Scrosati,et al.  Recent advances in lithium ion battery materials , 2000 .

[11]  B. Scrosati,et al.  Advances in lithium-ion batteries , 2002 .

[12]  G. Blomgren,et al.  Electrolytes for advanced batteries , 1999 .

[13]  Otmar Bitsche,et al.  Systems for hybrid cars , 2004 .

[14]  F. V. Conte,et al.  Battery and battery management for hybrid electric vehicles: a review , 2006, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[15]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Computational battery dynamics (CBD)—electrochemical/thermal coupled modeling and multi-scale modeling , 2002 .

[16]  R. Holm Electric contacts; theory and application , 1967 .

[17]  J. Greenwood Constriction resistance and the real area of contact , 1966 .

[18]  Paul A. Nelson,et al.  Modeling thermal management of lithium-ion PNGV batteries , 2002 .

[19]  C. Madhusudana Thermal Contact Conductance , 1996 .

[20]  M. Cooper,et al.  Thermal contact conductance , 1969 .

[21]  Erik Jonasson,et al.  Maximisation of brake energy regeneration in a hybrid electric parallel car , 2007 .