Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital

ABSTRACT Two central approaches to IT-enabled organisational change are process innovation and digital infrastructure research. In this study, we investigate the alignment between them, both from a theoretical and a practical perspective. They have quite different basic assumptions on evolution; process innovation is a top-down approach, while digital infrastructures evolve bottom-up and are partly outside direct managerial control. Our research question is, how can a process innovation initiative successfully align with an underlying digital infrastructure? Our empirical evidence is an in-depth case study at a new high-tech hospital in Norway. Building on a proposed framework of alignment between process innovation and digital infrastructure, we identify, analyse three architectural alignment mechanisms. We found that (i) the careful deployment of lightweight IT in onsite configuration, loosely coupled from the infrastructure activities, allows for fast process innovation while leveraging the slow and nonlinear evolution of infrastructure (ii) the interaction between lightweight IT and large clinical systems by a set of boundary resources resolves the tension between innovation and infrastructure. For practitioners, we show that lightweight IT can serve as a mediating technology in the configuration.

[1]  Daniel Beverungen,et al.  Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[3]  Robbert Huijsman,et al.  Supply chain management in health services: an overview , 2011 .

[4]  Tomas Lindroth,et al.  Co-creation and Fine-Tuning of Boundary Resources in Small-Scale Platformization , 2016, SCIS/IFIP8.6.

[5]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  A Governance Model for Managing Lightweight IT , 2017, WorldCIST.

[6]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[7]  Paul Harmon,et al.  The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[8]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[9]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[10]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Special issue on information infrastructures for healthcare: The global and local relation , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Transforming Digital Infrastructures through platformization , 2018, ECIS.

[12]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Terje Aksel Sanner,et al.  Creating Coordinative Paths from admission to discharge: The role of lightweight IT in hospital digital process innovation , 2018, HICSS.

[14]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Business Process Management , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[15]  Robert Wayne Gregory,et al.  IT Consumerization and the Transformation of IT Governance , 2018, MIS Q..

[16]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[17]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .

[18]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Incomplete by Design. A study of a design-in-use approach to systems implementation , 2017, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[20]  Jörg Becker,et al.  The Concept of Creativity in the Information Systems Discipline: Past, Present, and Prospects , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Business Process Management: Potentials and Challenges of Driving Innovation , 2015, BPM.

[23]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Robotic Process Automation at Telefónica O2 , 2016, MIS Q. Executive.

[24]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[27]  Cory P. Knobel,et al.  Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design , 2007 .

[28]  A. M. Weggelaar-Jansen,et al.  Transferring skills in quality collaboratives focused on improving patient logistics , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[29]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[30]  Jan Mendling,et al.  The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[31]  Kristoffer Røed,et al.  Integration as interdependent workaround , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  H. Kunkel.  GENERAL INTRODUCTION , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  The Transformative Role of Bimodal IT in an Era of Digital Business , 2017, HICSS.

[34]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[35]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Configuring information systems and work practices for each other: What competences are needed locally? , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[38]  Waldemar Kremser,et al.  The Dynamics of Drift in Digitized Processes , 2020, MIS Q..

[39]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems , 2010, BPM 2010.

[40]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Scaling Information Infrastructure: The Case of Next Generation IP in Internet , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[41]  Tanja Neumann,et al.  Case Study Research Principles And Practices , 2016 .

[42]  Jan C. Recker,et al.  Suggestions for the next wave of BPM research : strengthening the theoretical core and exploring the protective belt , 2014 .

[43]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..

[44]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[45]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[46]  Sandy Kemsley.  Emerging Technologies in BPM , 2015, BPM.

[47]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..