Comparison of the convergence characteristics of some iterative wave function optimization methods

The convergence properties of several iterative methods for the optimization of orbitals and configuration mixing coefficients in multiconfigurational electronic wave functions are compared. All of the iterative methods considered here are derived from corresponding approximate energy expressions. These energy expressions are discussed within the context of their suitability for the calculation of noninfinitesimal wave function corrections. A method based on the partitioned orbital Hessian matrix and which uses an approximate super‐CI secular equation for the wave function corrections is shown to posses second‐order convergence and to have the largest radius of convergence of the methods analyzed in detail in this work for several molecular examples. Particular attention is given to convergence properties for excited states, where the differences between these methods are most significant.

[1]  R. Pitzer.  Contribution of atomic orbital integrals to symmetry orbital integrals , 1973 .

[2]  Klaus Ruedenberg,et al.  MCSCF optimization through combined use of natural orbitals and the brillouin–levy–berthier theorem , 1979 .

[3]  T. C. Chang,et al.  Generalized brillouin theorem multiconfiguration method for excited states , 1977 .

[4]  Nobuhiro Kosugi,et al.  Efficient methods for solving the open-shell scf problem and for obtaining an initial guess. The , 1980 .

[5]  D. Yeager,et al.  Mode damping in multiconfigurational Hartree–Fock procedures , 1980 .

[6]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  A quadratically convergent multiconfiguration–self‐consistent field method with simultaneous optimization of orbitals and CI coefficients , 1980 .

[7]  J. Simons,et al.  Electronic structure of the lowest 1A1 and 3B1 states of cyclopropenylidene , 1979 .

[8]  H. Schaefer.  Methods of Electronic Structure Theory , 1977 .

[9]  F. Grein,et al.  Low‐lying valence states of the PO molecule according to configuration‐interaction calculations , 1973 .

[10]  Byron H. Lengsfield,et al.  General second order MCSCF theory: A density matrix directed algorithm , 1980 .

[11]  R. Stanton.  Multiple Solutions to the Hartree‐Fock Problem. I. General Treatment of Two‐Electron Closed‐Shell Systems , 1968 .

[12]  Danny L. Yeager,et al.  Convergency studies of second and approximate second order multiconfigurational Hartree−Fock procedures , 1979 .

[13]  J. Hinze,et al.  The Unitary group for the evaluation of electronic energy matrix elements , 1981 .

[14]  Bernard Levy,et al.  Generalized brillouin theorem for multiconfigurational SCF theories , 1968 .

[15]  E. Yurtsever,et al.  The orthogonal gradient method. A simple method to solve the closed‐shell, open‐shell, and multiconfiguration SCF equations , 1979 .

[16]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Multiconfiguration wavefunctions for excited states. Selection of optimal configurations: The b 1Σ+ and d 1Σ+ states of NH , 1977 .

[17]  Elijah Polak,et al.  Computational methods in optimization , 1971 .

[18]  D. Yarkony,et al.  Comment on the use of the augmented matrix in MCSCF theory , 1981 .

[19]  F. Grein,et al.  Convergence behavior of some multiconfiguration methods , 1976 .

[20]  F. Grein,et al.  Two‐By‐Two Rotation Method Applied to Selected Multiconfiguration Wavefunctions , 1972 .

[21]  Per E. M. Siegbahn,et al.  Generalizations of the direct CI method based on the graphical unitary group approach. I. Single replacements from a complete CI root function of any spin, first order wave functions , 1979 .

[22]  Poul Jo,et al.  Optimization of orbitals for multiconfigurational reference states , 1978 .