Fashion involvement, self‐monitoring and the meaning of brands

This study considers the importance of fashion involvement in the interpretation of brands of jeans as measured by Snyder’s revised self‐monitoring scale, which discriminates between people who are highly motivated to respond to social cues and those who remain “true to themselves”. Over 650 people in the UK aged 14‐34 were shown either a branded or unbranded stimulus. They were asked to record their attitude to 27 pairs of bipolar adjectives using a semantic differential scale. At the same time they completed Snyder’s scale. It was found that self‐monitoring is a significant mediator of meaning with regard to unbranded, but not branded, jeans. A model of choice by elimination of the unacceptable is suggested by high self‐monitoring responses. It has implications for the amount of advertising required to support a fashion brand.

[1]  Rebecca H. Holman.  Apparel As Communication , 1981 .

[2]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies , 1991 .

[3]  J. Noesjirwan,et al.  Variations in Perception of Clothing as a Function of Dress Form and Viewers' Social Community , 1982 .

[4]  Richard Elliott,et al.  Exploring the Symbolic Meaning of Brands , 1994 .

[5]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[6]  R. Elliott.  Existential consumption and irrational desire , 1997 .

[7]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring , 1992 .

[8]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[9]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  The Eye of the Beholder: Individual Differences in Perceptions of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[10]  V. J. Roth,et al.  Does clothing have a code? Empirical findings and theoretical implications in the study of clothing as a means of communication , 1989 .

[11]  M. Snyder.  Selling Images Versus Selling Products: Motivational Foundations of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior , 1989 .

[12]  Kenneth G. DeBono.  Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. , 1987 .

[13]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. , 1985 .

[14]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior , 1991 .

[16]  A. Fairhurst,et al.  Evaluations of Apparel Advertising as a Function of Self-Monitoring , 1988 .

[17]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[18]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal , 1991 .

[19]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Gender Differences in the Use of Message Cues and Judgments , 1991 .