The Combination of the R263K and T66I Resistance Substitutions in HIV-1 Integrase Is Incompatible with High-Level Viral Replication and the Development of High-Level Drug Resistance

ABSTRACT The R263K substitution in integrase has been selected in tissue culture with dolutegravir (DTG) and has been reported for several treatment-experienced individuals receiving DTG as part of salvage therapy. The R263K substitution seems to be incompatible with the presence of common resistance mutations associated with raltegravir (RAL), a different integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). T66I is a substitution that is common in individuals who have developed resistance against a different INSTI termed elvitegravir (EVG), but it is not known whether these two mutations might be compatible in the context of resistance against DTG or what impact the combination of these substitutions might have on resistance against INSTIs. E138K is a common secondary substitution observed with various primary resistance substitutions in RAL- and EVG-treated individuals. Viral infectivity, replicative capacity, and resistance against INSTIs were measured in cell-based assays. Strand transfer and 3′ processing activities were measured biochemically. The combination of the R263K and T66I substitutions decreased HIV-1 infectivity, replicative capacity, and strand transfer activity. The addition of the E138K substitution partially compensated for these deficits and resulted in high levels of resistance against EVG but not against DTG or RAL. These findings suggest that the presence of the T66I substitution will not compromise the activity of DTG and may also help to prevent the additional generation of the R263K mutation. Our observations support the use of DTG in second-line therapy for individuals who experience treatment failure with EVG due to the T66I substitution. IMPORTANCE The integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) elvitegravir and dolutegravir are newly developed inhibitors against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). HIV drug-resistant mutations in integrase that can arise in individuals treated with elvitegravir commonly include the T66I substitution, whereas R263K is a signature resistance substitution against dolutegravir. In order to determine how different combinations of integrase resistance mutations can influence the outcome of therapy, we report here the effects of the T66I, E138K, and R263K substitutions, alone and in combination, on viral replicative capacity and resistance to integrase inhibitors. Our results show that the addition of R263K to the T66I substitution diminishes viral replicative capacity and strand transfer activity while not compromising susceptibility to dolutegravir. This supports the use of dolutegravir in second-line therapy for patients failing elvitegravir therapy who harbor the T66I resistance substitution.

[1]  K. White,et al.  Analysis of early resistance development at the first failure timepoint in elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated patients. , 2015, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[2]  M. Ramgopal,et al.  Dolutegravir versus Placebo in Subjects Harbouring HIV-1 with Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Associated Substitutions: 48-Week Results from VIKING-4, a Randomized Study , 2015, Antiviral therapy.

[3]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Combination of the R263K and M184I/V Resistance Substitutions against Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Decreases HIV Replicative Capacity , 2015, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  M. Wainberg,et al.  The R262K Substitution Combined with H51Y in HIV-1 Subtype B Integrase Confers Low-Level Resistance against Dolutegravir , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Addition of E138K to R263K in HIV integrase increases resistance to dolutegravir, but fails to restore activity of the HIV integrase enzyme and viral replication capacity. , 2014, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[6]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Is Resistance to Dolutegravir Possible When This Drug Is Used in First-Line Therapy? , 2014, Viruses.

[7]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Resistance mutations against dolutegravir in HIV integrase impair the emergence of resistance against reverse transcriptase inhibitors , 2014, AIDS.

[8]  J. Eron,et al.  Resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors among clinical specimens in the United States, 2009-2012. , 2014, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  R. Haubrich,et al.  Dolutegravir in Antiretroviral-Experienced Patients With Raltegravir- and/or Elvitegravir-Resistant HIV-1: 24-Week Results of the Phase III VIKING-3 Study , 2014, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Biochemical Analysis of the Role of G118R-Linked Dolutegravir Drug Resistance Substitutions in HIV-1 Integrase , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  M. Wainberg,et al.  The M50I polymorphic substitution in association with the R263K mutation in HIV-1 subtype B integrase increases drug resistance but does not restore viral replicative fitness , 2014, Retrovirology.

[12]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors in HIV Therapy , 2013, Infectious Diseases and Therapy.

[13]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Biochemical Analysis of the Role of G118R-Linked Dolutegravir Drug Resistance Substitutions in HIV-1 Integrase , 2013, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  P. Cahn,et al.  Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  A. LaMarca,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir in Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Raltegravir-Resistant HIV Type 1 Infection: 24-Week Results of the VIKING Study , 2012, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Viral fitness cost prevents HIV-1 from evading dolutegravir drug pressure , 2013, Retrovirology.

[17]  M. Wainberg,et al.  A high-throughput assay for HIV-1 integrase 3'-processing activity using time-resolved fluorescence. , 2012, Journal of virological methods.

[18]  K. White,et al.  In vitro resistance selections using elvitegravir, raltegravir, and two metabolites of elvitegravir M1 and M4. , 2012, Antiviral research.

[19]  M. Wainberg,et al.  Characterization of the R263K Mutation in HIV-1 Integrase That Confers Low-Level Resistance to the Second-Generation Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Dolutegravir , 2011, Journal of Virology.

[20]  Soo-Yon Rhee,et al.  HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor Resistance and Its Clinical Implications , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[21]  Shigeru Miki,et al.  In Vitro Antiretroviral Properties of S/GSK1349572, a Next-Generation HIV Integrase Inhibitor , 2010, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[22]  D. Hazuda,et al.  Subgroup and resistance analyses of raltegravir for resistant HIV-1 infection. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Kozal,et al.  Natural Polymorphism of the HIV-1 Integrase Gene and Mutations associated with Integrase Inhibitor Resistance , 2007, Antiviral therapy.