The Mechanism of Ubiquitination in the Cullin-RING E3 Ligase Machinery: Conformational Control of Substrate Orientation

In cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases, substrate binding proteins, such as VHL-box, SOCS-box or the F-box proteins, recruit substrates for ubiquitination, accurately positioning and orienting the substrates for ubiquitin transfer. Yet, how the E3 machinery precisely positions the substrate is unknown. Here, we simulated nine substrate binding proteins: Skp2, Fbw7, β-TrCP1, Cdc4, Fbs1, TIR1, pVHL, SOCS2, and SOCS4, in the unbound form and bound to Skp1, ASK1 or Elongin C. All nine proteins have two domains: one binds to the substrate; the other to E3 ligase modules Skp1/ASK1/Elongin C. We discovered that in all cases the flexible inter-domain linker serves as a hinge, rotating the substrate binding domain, optimally and accurately positioning it for ubiquitin transfer. We observed a conserved proline in the linker of all nine proteins. In all cases, the prolines pucker substantially and the pucker is associated with the backbone rotation toward the E2/ubiquitin. We further observed that the linker flexibility could be regulated allosterically by binding events associated with either domain. We conclude that the flexible linker in the substrate binding proteins orients the substrate for the ubiquitin transfer. Our findings provide a mechanism for ubiquitination and polyubiquitination, illustrating that these processes are under conformational control.

[1]  Stefan Knapp,et al.  Structure of the SOCS4-ElonginB/C Complex Reveals a Distinct SOCS Box Interface and the Molecular Basis for SOCS-Dependent EGFR Degradation , 2007, Structure.

[2]  M. Pagano,et al.  Structural basis of the Cks1-dependent recognition of p27(Kip1) by the SCF(Skp2) ubiquitin ligase. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[3]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Insights into SCF ubiquitin ligases from the structure of the Skp1–Skp2 complex , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Geng Wu,et al.  Structure of a -TrCP1-Skp1--Catenin Complex , 2003 .

[5]  L. Lerman,et al.  Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in protein regulation. , 2007, Circulation research.

[6]  Timothy Cardozo,et al.  The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[7]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  A. Andreotti,et al.  Opening the pore hinges on proline , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[9]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J Wade Harper,et al.  Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-cyclin E complex: multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[11]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The ubiquitin system. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and conformational transitions via hinge-bending motions , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[13]  D. Boehr,et al.  How Do Proteins Interact? , 2008, Science.

[14]  Ehud Gazit,et al.  The von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein Is a Molten Globule under Native Conditions , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Tyers,et al.  Structural Basis for Phosphodependent Substrate Selection and Orientation by the SCFCdc4 Ubiquitin Ligase , 2003, Cell.

[16]  C. Lima,et al.  Taking it step by step: mechanistic insights from structural studies of ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like protein modification pathways. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site : A matter of pre-existing populations , 2001 .

[18]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Min Zhou,et al.  Activation of ubiquitin ligase SCF(Skp2) by Cks1: insights from hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  S. Elledge,et al.  Structure of the Cul1–Rbx1–Skp1–F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex , 2002, Nature.

[23]  J. Wade Harper,et al.  Drug discovery in the ubiquitin–proteasome system , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  M. Karplus,et al.  A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis , 2007, Nature.

[25]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[26]  K. Dill,et al.  The flexibility in the proline ring couples to the protein backbone , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Mechanistic insight into the allosteric activation of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by RING-type ubiquitin ligases. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Stefan Knapp,et al.  Crystal structure of the SOCS2–elongin C–elongin B complex defines a prototypical SOCS box ubiquitin ligase , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Takashi Yamane,et al.  Structural basis for the selection of glycosylated substrates by SCFFbs1 ubiquitin ligase , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allosteric effects in the marginally stable von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor protein and allostery-based rescue mutant design , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  D. Koshland.  Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[34]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[35]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[37]  Daniel C. Scott,et al.  Structural Insights into NEDD8 Activation of Cullin-RING Ligases: Conformational Control of Conjugation , 2008, Cell.

[38]  Geng Wu,et al.  Structure of a beta-TrCP1-Skp1-beta-catenin complex: destruction motif binding and lysine specificity of the SCF(beta-TrCP1) ubiquitin ligase. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[39]  Steven Hayward,et al.  Improvements in the analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: DynDom version 1.50. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[40]  Michal Sharon,et al.  Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase , 2007, Nature.

[41]  M. Ivan,et al.  Structure of an HIF-1α-pVHL Complex: Hydroxyproline Recognition in Signaling , 2002, Science.

[42]  N. Goodey,et al.  Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[43]  Ping Wang,et al.  Structure of a c-Cbl–UbcH7 Complex RING Domain Function in Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases , 2000, Cell.

[44]  K Schulten,et al.  Protein domain movements: detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates , 1997, Proteins.