Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models

[1] In this paper, we compare the retained and added variability obtained using the regional climate model CLM (Climate version of the Local Model of the German Weather Service) to an earlier study using the RAMS (Regional Atmospheric Modeling System) model. Both models yield similar results for their standard configurations with a commonly used nudging technique applied to the driving model fields. Significantly both models do not adequately retain the large-scale variability in total kinetic energy with results poorer on a larger grid domain. Additional experiments with interior nudging, however, permit the retention of large-scale values for both models. The spectral nudging technique permits more added variability at smaller scales than a four-dimensional internal grid nudging on large domains. We also confirmed that dynamic downscaling does not retain (or increase) simulation skill of the large-scale fields over and beyond that which exists in the larger-scale model or reanalysis. Our conclusions should be relevant to all applications of dynamic downscaling for regional climate simulations.

[1]  R. Pielke,et al.  Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) , 2005 .

[2]  Ratko Vasic,et al.  Assessment of Dynamic Downscaling of the Continental U.S. Regional Climate Using the Eta/SSiB Regional Climate Model , 2007 .

[3]  H. Kida,et al.  A New Approach for Coupling a Limited Area Model to a GCM for Regional Climate Simulations , 1991 .

[4]  H. Storch,et al.  A Spectral Nudging Technique for Dynamical Downscaling Purposes , 2000 .

[5]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Development of a Second-Generation Regional Climate Model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective Processes and Assimilation of Lateral Boundary Conditions , 1993 .

[6]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[7]  R. Pielke.  Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling , 1984 .

[8]  L. Leung,et al.  Regional Downscaling for Air Quality Assessment , 2007 .

[9]  M. Kanamitsu,et al.  Fifty-Seven-Year California Reanalysis Downscaling at 10 km (CaRD10). Part I: System Detail and Validation with Observations , 2007 .

[10]  R. Pielke,et al.  Investigation of the Summer Climate of the Contiguous United States and Mexico Using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Part I: Model Climatology (1950–2002) , 2007 .

[11]  Jean Côté,et al.  Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment , 2001 .

[12]  J. Steppeler,et al.  Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM , 2003 .

[13]  Ralf Weisse,et al.  Multi‐decadal atmospheric modeling for europe yields multi‐purpose data , 2001 .

[14]  Chris Hewitt,et al.  Ensembles-based predictions of climate changes and their impacts , 2004 .

[15]  H. Davies,et al.  A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. [numerical weather forecasting , 1976 .

[16]  S. Roy,et al.  Sensitivity of simulated mesoscale atmospheric circulations resulting from landscape heterogeneity to aspects of model configuration , 2002 .

[17]  F. Feser,et al.  Enhanced Detectability of Added Value in Limited-Area Model Results Separated into Different Spatial Scales , 2006 .

[18]  C. Castro.  Investigation of the Summer Climate of the Contiguous United States and Mexico Using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System ( RAMS ) . Part II : Model Climate Variability , 2007 .

[19]  A. Sterl,et al.  The ERA‐40 re‐analysis , 2005 .

[20]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations , 2004 .