Effects of grass roots on the erodibility of topsoils during concentrated flow

Abstract Traditional vegetative techniques to control gully development rely mainly on the effects of above ground biomass, whereas little attention has been given to the role of below ground biomass. Yet, in a context where above ground biomass may temporarily or spatially disappear (e.g. due to fire or grazing), roots can play an important role in protecting soil against erosion. Few studies have investigated the impacts of roots of natural vegetation (such as grass) on the resistance of topsoils in concentrated flow erosion zones, although grasses grow in many environments. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the impact of root density and root length density of grass on the erodibility of root-permeated saturated topsoils. Three plots were established on a sandy loam. Their treatments were (1) bare, (2) low density drilled grass and (3) high density drilled grass, simulating different root densities. After one month, topsoil samples were taken and subjected to concentrated flow using a hydraulic flume in the laboratory. Slope, flow discharge, mean velocity, water temperature and sediment concentration were measured. Root density and root length density values were assessed. Relative soil detachment rates and mean flow shear stresses were calculated. The results indicate a negative exponential relation between the relative soil detachment rate and root density as well as root length density, independent of the applied flow shear stresses. However, the best relationship fitting the data is the Hill curve, indicating that relative soil detachment rates decrease to very low values (0.05) with an increase in root density from 0 to 4 kg m − 3 or root length density from 0 to 400 km m − 3 . A comparison between the effects of vegetation cover on sheet and rill erosion rates and those of the root area ratio of grass roots on relative soil detachment rates reveals that grass roots are very effective in reducing soil detachment rates. The equations obtained can be used to predict the effect of grass roots on soil erosion rates during concentrated runoff and to evaluate the ability of roots to increase topsoil resistance against erosion by concentrated flow. Calculations of relative erosion rates using the equations from the RUSLE and WEPP models indicate that the observed trend is better predicted with the RUSLE model and the WEPP model for croplands than with the WEPP model for rangelands.

[1]  M. Styczen,et al.  ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF VEGETATION , 2003 .

[2]  R. Morgan Soil Erosion and Conservation , 1988 .

[3]  David C. Ditsch,et al.  A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops , 1998 .

[4]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .

[5]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Transporting capacity of overland flow on plane and on irregular beds , 1986 .

[6]  M. Mamo,et al.  DETACHMENT RATE, SOIL ERODIBILITY, AND SOIL STRENGTH AS INFLUENCED BY LIVING PLANT ROOTS PART I: LABORATORY STUDY , 2001 .

[7]  R. J. Rickson,et al.  Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control: A Bioengineering Approach , 1994 .

[8]  J. Poesen,et al.  Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs , 2003 .

[9]  Jean Poesen,et al.  The importance of plant root characteristics in controlling concentrated flow erosion rates , 2003 .

[10]  M. A. Nearing,et al.  A Consolidation Model for Estimating Changes in Rill Erodibility , 1988 .

[11]  W. Bergmann,et al.  Schuurman, J. J., and Goedewaagen, M. A. J.: Methods for the examination of root systems and roots. (Methoden zur Untersuchung der Wurzeln und Wurzelsysteme.) Agric. Public. and Documentation Wageningen/Holland 1965. 86 Seiten, 36 Abbildungen (E). Dfl 10.50/21 S./$3.– , 1965 .

[12]  X Hu,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF PLANT ROOTS TO INCREASE THE ANTI-SCOURABILITY OF SOIL ON THE LOESS PLATEAU , 1991 .

[13]  Frances A. Brindle Use of Native Vegetation and Biostimulants for Controlling Soil Erosion on Steep Terrain , 2003 .

[14]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Effect of soil shear strength on soil detachment due to raindrop impact , 1977 .

[15]  Jean Poesen,et al.  A long flume study of the dynamic factors affecting the resistance of a loamy soil to concentrated flow erosion , 1990 .

[16]  R. Loch,et al.  Estimation of erosion model erodibility parameters from media properties , 2000 .

[17]  G. T. Tengbeh,et al.  The effect of grass roots on shear strength variations with moisture content , 1993 .

[18]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency , 1987 .

[19]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Root methods: A handbook , 2000 .

[20]  Donald H. Gray,et al.  Biotechnical Slope Protection and Erosion Control , 1989 .

[21]  J. J. Schuurman,et al.  Methods for the Examination of Root Systems and Roots , 1965, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[22]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[23]  E. Bui,et al.  GROWING CORN ROOT EFFECTS ON INTERRILL SOIL EROSION , 1993 .

[24]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Flow resistance and sediment transport by concentrated overland flow in a grassland valley , 1995 .

[25]  Dr. Wolfgang Böhm Methods of Studying Root Systems , 1979, Ecological Studies.

[26]  Jean Poesen,et al.  Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review , 2005 .

[27]  J. Poesen,et al.  Concentrated flow erosion rates as affected by rock fragment cover and initial soil moisture content , 1999 .

[28]  F. Ghidey,et al.  PLANT ROOT EFFECTS ON SOIL ERODIBILITY, SPLASH DETACHMENT, SOIL STRENGTH, AND AGGREGATE STABILITY , 1997 .

[29]  Donald H. Gray,et al.  Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control , 1996 .