Counting hard-to-count populations: the network scale-up method for public health

Estimating sizes of hidden or hard-to-reach populations is an important problem in public health. For example, estimates of the sizes of populations at highest risk for HIV and AIDS are needed for designing, evaluating and allocating funding for treatment and prevention programmes. A promising approach to size estimation, relatively new to public health, is the network scale-up method (NSUM), involving two steps: estimating the personal network size of the members of a random sample of a total population and, with this information, estimating the number of members of a hidden subpopulation of the total population. We describe the method, including two approaches to estimating personal network sizes (summation and known population). We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and provide examples of international applications of the NSUM in public health. We conclude with recommendations for future research and evaluation.

[1]  R. Brookmeyer,et al.  Monitoring the health of populations: statistical principles and methods for public health surveillance. , 2003 .

[2]  E. Laska,et al.  A plant-capture method for estimating the size of a population from a single sample. , 1988, Biometrics.

[3]  V W Sidel,et al.  Capture-recapture methods for assessing the completeness of case ascertainment when using multiple information sources. , 1974, Journal of chronic diseases.

[4]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survey Errors and Survey Costs , 1990 .

[5]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Who knows your HIV status? What HIV + patients and their network members know about each other , 1995 .

[6]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Who Knows Your HIV Status II?: Information Propagation Within Social Networks of Seropositive People , 2006 .

[7]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[8]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[9]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Scale-Up Methods as Applied to Estimates of Heroin use , 2006 .

[10]  Roberto Corradetti,et al.  Use of the scale-up methods in injury prevention research: An empirical assessment to the case of choking in children , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[11]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[12]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  A social network approach to corroborating the number of AIDS/HIV+ victims in the US ° , 1995 .

[13]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  How Many People Do You Know?: Efficiently Estimating Personal Network Size , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[14]  Paola Berchialla,et al.  Question Order and Interviewer Effects in CATI Scale-up Surveys , 2009 .

[15]  W. Kalsbeek.  The Use of Surveys in Public Health Surveillance: Monitoring High-Risk Populations , 2009 .

[16]  Susan Castillo,et al.  Issues and Methods , 2005 .

[17]  Matthew Hickman,et al.  Methods for assessing HIV and HIV risk among IDUs and for evaluating interventions , 2005 .

[18]  Liz Twigg,et al.  Predicting small area health-related behaviour: a comparison of multilevel synthetic estimation and local survey data. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[19]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Estimation of Seroprevalence, Rape, and Homelessness in the United States Using a Social Network Approach , 1998, Evaluation review.

[20]  Tian Zheng,et al.  How Many People Do You Know in Prison? , 2006 .

[21]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Investigating the Variation of Personal Network Size Under Unknown Error Conditions , 2006 .

[22]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation: Some empirical results☆ , 1991 .

[23]  C. McCarty,et al.  Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Network Size , 2001 .

[24]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  A social network approach to estimating seroprevalence in the United States , 1998 .

[25]  R R Regal,et al.  Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. , 1995, Epidemiologic reviews.

[26]  P. Reuter.  Prevalence Estimation and Policy Formulation , 1993 .

[27]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  The game of contacts: Estimating the social visibility of groups , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[28]  E Pisani,et al.  Estimating the size of populations at risk for HIV: issues and methods. A joint UNAIDS / IMPACT / FHI workshop: report and conclusions. Updated. , 2003 .

[29]  Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation , 1993 .

[30]  Michael P. Carey,et al.  Accuracy of Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI) and Self-Administered Questionnaires for the Assessment of Sexual Behavior , 2006, AIDS and Behavior.