Synchronisation and Emergent Behaviour in Networks of Heterogeneous Systems: A Control Theory Perspective

Generally speaking, for a network of interconnected systems, synchronisation consists in the mutual coordination of the systems’ motions to reach a common behaviour. For homogeneous systems that have identical dynamics this typically consists in asymptotically stabilising a common equilibrium set. In the case of heterogeneous networks, in which systems may have different parameters and even different dynamics, there may exist no common equilibrium but an emergent behaviour arises. Inherent to the network, this is determined by the connection graph but it is independent of the interconnection strength. Thus, the dynamic behaviour of the networked systems is fully characterised in terms of two properties whose study may be recast in the domain of stability theory through the analysis of two interconnected dynamical systems evolving in orthogonal spaces: the emergent dynamics and the synchronisation errors relative to the common behaviour. Based on this premise, we present some results on robust stability by which one may assess the conditions for practical asymptotic synchronisation of networked systems. As an illustration, we broach a brief case-study on mutual synchronisation of heterogeneous chaotic oscillators.

[1]  M. Corless,et al.  Continuous state feedback guaranteeing uniform ultimate boundedness for uncertain dynamic systems , 1981 .

[2]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Synchronization of interconnected systems with an input-output approach. Part I: Main results , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[3]  T. Glad,et al.  On Diffusion Driven Oscillations in Coupled Dynamical Systems , 1999 .

[4]  Jinhu Lu,et al.  A New Chaotic Attractor Coined , 2002, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[5]  Denis Efimov,et al.  Switched Mutual--Master-Slave Synchronisation: Application to Mechanical Systems , 2008 .

[6]  David Angeli,et al.  A Lyapunov approach to incremental stability properties , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  I. Tyukin,et al.  Semi-passivity and synchronization of diffusively coupled neuronal oscillators , 2009, 0903.3535.

[8]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus-based Design Methodologies for Distributed Multivehicle Cooperative Control , 2008 .

[9]  Alberto Isidori,et al.  Nonlinear Control Systems II , 1999 .

[10]  W. Lohmiller,et al.  Contraction analysis of non-linear distributed systems , 2005 .

[11]  H. Nijmeijer,et al.  Partial synchronization: from symmetry towards stability , 2002 .

[12]  Toshiki Oguchi,et al.  Synchronization of Bidirectionally Coupled Nonlinear Systems with Time-Varying Delay , 2009 .

[13]  O. Rössler An equation for hyperchaos , 1979 .

[14]  Martin Hasler,et al.  Synchronization of bursting neurons: what matters in the network topology. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[16]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Introduction to Matrix Analysis , 1972 .

[17]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Methodological remarks on contraction theory , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[18]  Luca Scardovi,et al.  An Input-Output approach to the robust synchronization of dynamical systems with an application to the Hindmarsh-Rose neuronal model , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[19]  H Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Synchronization of Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[20]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  An observer looks at synchronization , 1997 .

[21]  H. Nijmeijer,et al.  Cooperative oscillatory behavior of mutually coupled dynamical systems , 2001 .