Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

OBJECTIVES--To compare the performance of a disease specific and a general health questionnaire in assessing changes resulting from total hip replacement. DESIGN--Two stage prospective study of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery involving an assessment at a clinic before and six months after surgery. 60(32%) patients were followed up by post. SETTING--Outpatient departments at a specialist orthopaedic hospital and peripheral clinics within Oxfordshire. PATIENTS--188 patients admitted for unilateral total hip replacement between February and mid-August 1994. MAIN MEASURES--Patients' self assessed scores with the 12 item Oxford hip score and SF-36 general health questionnaire together with surgeons' assessment with Charnley hip score obtained before and again at six months after surgery. RESULTS--186 patients were followed up six months after total hip replacement; a subsample (n=60) by post. Of the 60 postal patients, 59(98.3%) fully completed the Oxford hip score compared with 44(73.3%) who fully completed the SF-36. For the followup sample as a whole, post operative changes in scores produced a large effect size of 2.75 on the Oxford hip score, compared with -1.89 physical function (SF-36), -2.13 pain (SF-36). With the exception of physical function and role (physical), postoperative SF-36 scores were shown to be similar to or better than those found by two population surveys on patients of comparable age. The responsiveness of a disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and relevant sections of a general questionnaire, SF-36, were found to be similar as assessed by three different criteria. CONCLUSIONS--A disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and a general state of health questionnaire, SF-36, performed similarly in assessing outcomes of total hip replacement except that the disease specific questionnaire resulted in a higher completion rate and greater responsiveness in some sections. On the other hand the general health questionnaire drew attention to broader problems of physical function not considered by the Oxford hip score. The health questionnaires examined here offer a valid and practical means of monitoring outcomes of hip replacement surgery.

[1]  M. Scarborough,et al.  Resection Arthrodesis of the Knee with an Intercalary Allograft* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  James G Wright,et al.  Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. , 1995, Medical care.

[3]  R. Madhok,et al.  Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met? , 1995, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[4]  J. Morris,et al.  The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? , 1995, Age and ageing.

[5]  M. Abdalla,et al.  SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[6]  M. Abdalla,et al.  SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[7]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  P. Christel,et al.  Recent advances in adult hip joint surgery. , 1994, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[9]  A. Frater,et al.  Health status, outcome, and attributability: is a red rose red in the dark? , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.

[10]  D W Murray,et al.  Survival analysis of joint replacements. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Transition questions to assess outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[12]  M Gross,et al.  Innovations in surgery. A proposal for phased clinical trials. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  J. Buchanan Designer hips. , 1993, BMJ.

[14]  S Ziebland,et al.  A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  P. Amadio Outcomes measurements. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation. , 1992, BMJ.

[17]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status Instruments , 1992, Medical care.

[18]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[20]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. , 1992, Quality in health care : QHC.

[21]  H. McGee,et al.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement , 1992, The Lancet.

[22]  R. Hays,et al.  Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project. , 1992, Medical care.

[23]  D. Lansky,et al.  Using health status measures in the hospital setting: from acute care to 'outcomes management'. , 1992, Medical care.

[24]  P. Herberts,et al.  Cemented revision hip arthroplasty. A multicenter 5-9-year study of 204 first revisions for loosening. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  C. Venables,et al.  Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy. , 1992, Quality in health care : QHC.

[26]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[27]  B Romanus,et al.  A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  M. Liang,et al.  The total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation form of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Results of a nominal group process. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Task Force on Outcome Studies. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.

[31]  L E Kazis,et al.  Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Randomized trials in orthopaedics: why, how, and when? , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[34]  R. Deyo,et al.  Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life , 1989, Medical care.

[35]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[36]  M H Liang,et al.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[37]  R. Steele,et al.  Total hip replacement of failed surface arthroplasty. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[38]  R. Deyo,et al.  Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. , 1984, Health services research.

[39]  E. Badley,et al.  Hip arthroplasty: patient satisfaction. , 1983, British journal of rheumatology.

[40]  P. Gertman,et al.  The arthritis impact measurement scales. Further investigations of a health status measure. , 1982, Arthritis & Rheumatism.

[41]  R. Ganz,et al.  The hip. , 1982, Clinics in rheumatic diseases.

[42]  P. Gertman,et al.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[43]  C. Wells,et al.  A new clinical taxonomy for rating change in functional activities of patients with angina pectoris. , 1977, American heart journal.

[44]  J. Charnley,et al.  The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[45]  M. J. Kingma [Total hip replacement]. , 1971, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.