GRAFT: A Model for Evaluating Actuator Systems in Terms of Force Production

In the scope of evaluation methodologies for Internet of Things (IoT) systems, some approaches concern security, while others latency. However, some methodologies evaluate systems that contain active entities, so-called actuators. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology for evaluating such systems with actuator components using Graph Representation of the Angle of the Force and Time (GRAFT). GRAFT facilitates easy computation of the net force produced by physical or mechanical acts occurring on a daily basis on Earth. We use laws and definitions of physics describing the relations between Speed, Distance, and Time (SDT), apply them in a heliocentric system, and model the considered systems with a graph. The continuous movement of the Earth was shown to be weakening the total produced net force in some systems. We considered this weakening issue a problem, and we propose two possible solutions to overcome it by using restoration values, or reordering actuator sessions, in GRAFT to arrive to a more force-efficient system. We compared our default GRAFT algorithm to a special implementation using the Clock-Angle-Problem (CAP) for sessions. We also study and discuss an IoT-focused case for validating our approach, and we present a detailed explanation of the proposed GRAFT algorithm. The experimental results show the ability of GRAFT to provide highly accurate results, which also exemplifies that our GRAFT approach is programmable, hence deployable in real life scenarios.

[1]  Gang Mei,et al.  A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) for Geohazard Prevention: Applications, Technologies, and Challenges , 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[2]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  The Universe In A Nutshell , 2016 .

[4]  Robert L. Lehrman,et al.  Energy is Not the Ability to do Work. , 1973 .

[5]  Michiel van de Panne,et al.  Sensor-actuator networks , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Comparison of IoT platform architectures: A field study based on a reference architecture , 2016, 2016 Cloudification of the Internet of Things (CIoT).

[7]  Helmut Moritz,et al.  Geodetic Reference System 1980 , 1980 .

[8]  José D. P. Rolim,et al.  Evaluating design approaches for smart building systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2012).

[9]  Pablo Palacios,et al.  Approximation and Temperature Control System via an Actuator and a Cloud: An Application Based on the IoT for Smart Houses , 2018, 2018 International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG).

[10]  Jason Zimba Force and Motion: An Illustrated Guide to Newton's Laws , 2009 .

[11]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Guest Editorial: Introduction to the Special Section on Sensor Data Computing as a Service in Internet of Things , 2019, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput..

[12]  David Blaauw,et al.  A Self-Tuning IoT Processor Using Leakage-Ratio Measurement for Energy-Optimal Operation , 2020, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[13]  Shabir Ahmad,et al.  A Novel Approach of IoT Services Orchestration Based on Multiple Sensor and Actuator Platforms Using Virtual Objects in Online IoT App-Store , 2019, Sustainability.

[14]  J. Ferrándiz,et al.  Earth’s Rotation: A Challenging Problem in Mathematics and Physics , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[15]  Elwood S. Buffa,et al.  Graph Theory with Applications , 1977 .

[16]  Feng Xia,et al.  QoS Challenges and Opportunities in Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks , 2008, Sensors.

[17]  Richard Harper,et al.  Inside the Smart Home , 2003, Springer London.

[18]  Amr Mohamed,et al.  Edge Computing for Smart Health: Context-Aware Approaches, Opportunities, and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Network.

[19]  B. Greene,et al.  The fabric of the cosmos : space, time, and the texture of reality , 2004 .

[20]  S. Chandrasekhar CONSERVATION LAWS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY AND IN THE POST-NEWTONIAN APPROXIMATIONS. , 1969 .

[21]  John Goodier,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Solar System , 2000 .

[22]  B. Chao,et al.  Coseismic changes of gravitational potential energy induced by global earthquakes based on spherical‐Earth elastic dislocation theory , 2017 .

[23]  J. Li,et al.  Smart city and the applications , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC).

[24]  Yingfeng Zhang,et al.  An ‘Internet of Things’ enabled dynamic optimization method for smart vehicles and logistics tasks , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[25]  Chih-Yuan Huang,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of Four Interoperable Open Standards for the Internet of Things , 2015, Sensors.

[26]  John Scott Drilling,et al.  in Allen''''s Astrophysical Quantities , 2000 .

[27]  Manuel Díaz,et al.  State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[28]  Stephenson,et al.  Historical eclipses and the earth's rotation , 1997, Science progress.

[29]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of a Mobile Sensor/Actuator Network for Autonomous Animal Control , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[30]  Ki-Hyun Kim,et al.  Solar energy: Potential and future prospects , 2018 .

[31]  Axel Kleidon,et al.  Earth as a Hybrid Planet - The Anthropocene in an Evolutionary Astrobiological Context , 2017, 1708.08121.