Stroke patients’ utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation

BackgroundEvidence indicates that post − stroke rehabilitation improves function, independence and quality of life. A key aspect of rehabilitation is the provision of appropriate information and feedback to the learner.Advances in information and communications technology (ICT) have allowed for the development of various systems to complement stroke rehabilitation that could be used in the home setting. These systems may increase the provision of rehabilitation a stroke survivor receives and carries out, as well as providing a learning platform that facilitates long-term self-managed rehabilitation and behaviour change. This paper describes the application of an innovative evaluative methodology to explore the utilisation of feedback for post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation in the home.MethodsUsing the principles of realistic evaluation, this study aimed to test and refine intervention theories by exploring the complex interactions of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes that arise from technology deployment in the home. Methods included focus groups followed by multi-method case studies (n = 5) before, during and after the use of computer-based equipment. Data were analysed in relation to the context-mechanism-outcome hypotheses case by case. This was followed by a synthesis of the findings to answer the question, ‘what works for whom and in what circumstances and respects?’ResultsData analysis reveals that to achieve desired outcomes through the use of ICT, key elements of computer feedback, such as accuracy, measurability, rewarding feedback, adaptability, and knowledge of results feedback, are required to trigger the theory-driven mechanisms underpinning the intervention. In addition, the pre-existing context and the personal and environmental contexts, such as previous experience of service delivery, personal goals, trust in the technology, and social circumstances may also enable or constrain the underpinning theory-driven mechanisms.ConclusionsFindings suggest that the theory-driven mechanisms underpinning the utilisation of feedback from computer-based technology for home-based upper-limb post-stroke rehabilitation are dependent on key elements of computer feedback and the personal and environmental context. The identification of these elements may therefore inform the development of technology; therapy education and the subsequent adoption of technology and a self-management paradigm; long-term self-managed rehabilitation; and importantly, improvements in the physical and psychosocial aspects of recovery.

[1]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  S. Spaulding,et al.  Motor Learning and the Use of Videotape Feedback After Stroke , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[3]  N. Denzin,et al.  Strategies Of Qualitative Inquiry , 2012 .

[4]  Marie Johnston,et al.  Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  H. Stam,et al.  ''Playstation eyetoy games'' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2008, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. , 1979, Physiotherapy.

[7]  Koen Putman,et al.  Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: a European multicentre study , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[8]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[9]  Derick T Wade,et al.  Somatosensory recovery: A longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  Diana Prichard,et al.  Physiotherapy exercise programmes: Are instructional exercise sheets effective? , 2005, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[11]  Fiona Jones,et al.  Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: How can we apply this to stroke? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  T Dowswell,et al.  Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. , 2000, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  H. S. Jørgensen,et al.  The Influence of Age on Stroke Outcome: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1994, Stroke.

[14]  S. Small,et al.  Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  H. Duffau Brain plasticity: From pathophysiological mechanisms to therapeutic applications , 2006, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[17]  Sharon Lawn,et al.  Chronic physical illness: self-management and behavioural interventions , 2009, International Journal of Integrated Care.

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  T. Olsen,et al.  Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[20]  P A O'Neill,et al.  The value of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test in screening for dysphasia: better than the clinician? , 1990 .

[21]  Lorie G. Richards,et al.  Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Inertial sensors for motion detection of human upper limbs , 2007 .

[24]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy , 2007 .

[25]  M. Majsak,et al.  Application of Motor Learning Principles to the Stroke Population. , 1996, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[26]  A Ashburn,et al.  Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  R L Hewer,et al.  Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  M. Levin,et al.  Systematic Review of the Evidence Does Provision of Extrinsic Feedback Result in Improved Motor Learning in the Upper Limb Poststroke ? , 2009 .

[29]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The effect of sensory feedback on the timing of movements: Evidence from deafferented patients , 2006, Brain Research.

[30]  E. Vakil,et al.  Motor and non-motor sequence learning in patients with basal ganglia lesions: the case of serial reaction time (SRT) , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J. Wickens,et al.  Neural mechanisms of reward-related motor learning , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  B. Hanna,et al.  Recovery after stroke: a qualitative perspective. , 2001, Journal of quality in clinical practice.

[33]  C. Winstein,et al.  Explicit Information Interferes with Implicit Motor Learning of Both Continuous and Discrete Movement Tasks After Stroke , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[34]  S. Coote,et al.  Robot mediated therapy: Attitudes of patients and therapists towards the first prototype of the GENTLE/s system , 2003 .

[35]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[36]  Judith Green,et al.  Qualitative methods for health research , 2004 .

[37]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[38]  R. Fleming Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS , 2010 .

[39]  S. Mawson,et al.  The SMART Rehabilitation System for Stroke Self‐management: Issues and Challenges for Evidence‐based Health Technology Research , 2011 .

[40]  Francesco Piccione,et al.  Virtual environment vs conventional physical therapy for arm motor rehabilitation after stroke: a RCT study , 2008 .

[41]  David Richards,et al.  Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing? , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[42]  A. Geurts,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[44]  김만두,et al.  Interviewing , 2018, The Public Relations Writer’s Handbook.

[45]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  Dimitrios Kapogiannis,et al.  Reward‐related activity in the human motor cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  Derick T Wade,et al.  Should all stroke rehabilitation be home based? , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[48]  W. Prinz,et al.  Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  M G Fischman,et al.  Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[50]  G S Bowman,et al.  Coping with stroke at home. , 1983, International rehabilitation medicine.

[51]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[52]  Jack Parker,et al.  A review of the evidence underpinning the use of visual and auditory feedback for computer technology in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[53]  Matthew S. Grubb,et al.  Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  Alan M Borthwick,et al.  Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[55]  L. Hale,et al.  Exploring the content of physiotherapeutic home-based stroke rehabilitation in New Zealand. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[56]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Quality of Life Following Stroke: Negotiating Disability, Identity, and Resources , 2005 .

[57]  C Ballinger,et al.  Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[58]  Ann Bowling,et al.  Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services , 1997 .

[59]  Britt Bäckström,et al.  The meaning of middle-aged female spouses' lived experience of the relationship with a partner who has suffered a stroke, during the first year postdischarge. , 2010, Nursing inquiry.

[60]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[61]  N. Sims,et al.  Mitochondria, oxidative metabolism and cell death in stroke. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[62]  Verena Schwaighofer,et al.  The qualitative interviews , 2014 .

[63]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  The SMART project: A user led approach to developing applications for domiciliary stroke rehabilitation , 2006 .

[64]  J. Kitzinger Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings , 2005 .

[65]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Pathophysiology of Stroke Rehabilitation: The Natural Course of Clinical Recovery, Use-Dependent Plasticity and Rehabilitative Outcome , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[66]  Manin H. Konijnenbelt,et al.  Proprioception of the shoulder after stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[67]  K. Tham,et al.  Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualized intervention , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[68]  F. Leeuw,et al.  Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation , 2010 .

[69]  L. Roberts,et al.  Communicating With Patients: What Happens in Practice? , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[70]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Direct Instrumental Conditioning of Neural Activity Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Reward Feedback , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Rtf Cheung Recent advances in stroke , 2000 .

[72]  L. Wright,et al.  The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.) , 2006 .

[73]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Recent Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[74]  Justin T. Maxwell,et al.  The implicit benefit of learning without errors , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[75]  S. McDonough,et al.  Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Still more virtual than real , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[76]  Rose Wiles,et al.  Recovery plateau following stroke: Fact or fiction? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[77]  M. Levin,et al.  Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[78]  M K Dorsey,et al.  The stroke patient and assessment of caregiver needs. , 1998, Journal of vascular nursing : official publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing.

[79]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[80]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[81]  D. Rand,et al.  The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: Low-Cost Virtual Reality for Use in Rehabilitation , 2008, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[82]  Lorraine N. Smith,et al.  Stroke: an exploration of the experience of informal caregiving , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[83]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  The influence of social support and perceived control on handicap and quality of life after stroke , 2001, Aging.

[84]  S. Inati,et al.  An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning , 2005, NeuroImage.

[85]  S. Payne,et al.  Self-body split: issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[86]  Anne Mandy,et al.  Changing self-efficacy in individuals following a first time stroke: preliminary study of a novel self-management intervention , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[87]  P. Weiss,et al.  Intervention using the VMall for improving motor and functional ability of the upper extremity in post stroke participants. , 2009, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[88]  Hannes Devos,et al.  Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[89]  M. Suto,et al.  Qualitative Research for Occupational and Physical Therapists: A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[90]  Catherine M. Dean,et al.  Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation : bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment , 1994 .

[91]  Kadriye Ones,et al.  Quality of life for patients poststroke and the factors affecting it. , 2005, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[92]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[93]  D. French,et al.  Coping with the Challenges of Recovery from Stroke , 2008, Journal of health psychology.

[94]  W. Levack,et al.  Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[95]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Utilization-focused evaluation , 1998 .

[96]  J. Saldaña,et al.  Drawing and verifying conclusions. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook , 2014 .

[97]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[98]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[99]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[100]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[101]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Implicit motor-sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: the impact of practice and explicit knowledge , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[102]  J. Meyrick What is Good Qualitative Research? , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[103]  C. Mathers,et al.  Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[104]  Jerry H. Gurwitz,et al.  The Treating Physician as Active Gatekeeper in the Recruitment of Research Subjects , 2001, Medical care.

[105]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[106]  G Gard,et al.  Interaction between patient and physiotherapist: a qualitative study reflecting the physiotherapist's perspective. , 1999, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[107]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[108]  C. Cunningham,et al.  Recovery after stroke: a 1-year profile , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[109]  Carlo C. DiClemente,et al.  The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy , 1994 .

[110]  G. Wulf,et al.  An external focus of attention attenuates balance impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease who have a fall history , 2005 .

[111]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[112]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability , 2010 .

[113]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[114]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[115]  Kim Brock,et al.  Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[116]  Catherine M. Dean,et al.  Increasing the amount of physical activity undertaken after stroke , 2006 .

[117]  M Marshall A study to elicit the core components of stroke rehabilitation and the subsequent development of a taxonomy of the therapy process. , 2004 .

[118]  R L Hewer,et al.  The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. , 1987, International rehabilitation medicine.

[119]  C. Mathers,et al.  Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[120]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  "If I can't do it once, why do it a hundred times?": Connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[121]  E. Lindeman,et al.  Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[122]  M. Johnston,et al.  From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques , 2008 .

[123]  Afsane Riazi,et al.  Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[124]  Jaap H. Buurke,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence? , 2009, Stroke.

[125]  D. Filion,et al.  Implicit learning of a perceptual-motor skill after stroke. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[126]  Javier Almazán,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Rehabilitation at Home after Stroke: One-Year Follow-Up of Patient Outcome, Resource Use and Cost , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[127]  C. Skilbeck,et al.  An activities index for use with stroke patients. , 1983, Age and ageing.

[128]  D. Wade,et al.  Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[129]  Kerstin Tham,et al.  Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[130]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Developing a personalised self-management system for post stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[131]  C. Ward,et al.  Goal-setting in rehabilitation: report of a workshop to explore professionals' perceptions of goal-setting , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[132]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Developing a telemonitoring system for stroke rehabilitation , 2007 .

[133]  Rui C. V. Loureiro,et al.  Gaming and Social Interactions in the Rehabilitation of Brain Injuries: A Pilot Study with the Nintendo Wii Console , 2010 .

[134]  Johanne Desrosiers,et al.  Changes in Participation After a Mild Stroke: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[135]  Janet H. Carr,et al.  Enhancing Physical Activity and Brain Reorganization after Stroke , 2011, Neurology research international.

[136]  Koen Putman,et al.  Stroke caregivers' strain: prevalence and determinants in the first six months after stroke , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[137]  Antonia M Nelson,et al.  Addressing the threat of evidence-based practice to qualitative inquiry through increasing attention to quality: a discussion paper. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.

[138]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation , 1996 .

[139]  Anne Mandy,et al.  Reasons for recovery after stroke: A perspective based on personal experience , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[140]  Rose Wiles,et al.  Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[141]  D. Wade,et al.  Personal context as a focus for rehabilitation , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[142]  S. Hatano,et al.  Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. , 1976, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[143]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Learning Implicitly: Effects of Task and Severity After Stroke , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[144]  Francesco Piccione,et al.  Reinforced Feedback in Virtual Environment Facilitates the Arm Motor Recovery in Patients after a Recent Stroke , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[145]  C. Winstein,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Cerebellar Stroke Impairs Temporal but Not Spatial Accuracy during Implicit Motor Learning Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[146]  J. Gladman,et al.  Functional recovery of community stroke patients , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[147]  Michael Weaver,et al.  Caregiving problems and feelings experienced by family caregivers of stroke survivors the first month after discharge , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[148]  S. Small,et al.  Functions of the Mirror Neuron System: Implications for Neurorehabilitation , 2006, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[149]  L. Kalra,et al.  Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation 2006. , 2007, Stroke.

[150]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[151]  D. Wade,et al.  Recovery after stroke , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[152]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[153]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF Core Sets for stroke. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[154]  M. Johnston,et al.  Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[155]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[156]  Annie Rochette, Johanne Desrosiers, Luc Noreau,et al.  Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke , 2001 .

[157]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Informal carers' experience of caring for stroke survivors. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[158]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  User-centered design for supporting the self-management of chronic illnesses: an interdisciplinary approach , 2009, PETRA '09.

[159]  D K Chong Measurement of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke. , 1995, Stroke.

[160]  C. Wright,et al.  Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[161]  Catherine Sackley,et al.  Use of information feedback and attentional focus of feedback in treating the person with a hemiplegic arm. , 2009, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[162]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[163]  Lena von Koch,et al.  The Meaning of Rehabilitation in the Home Environment After Acute Stroke From the Perspective of a Multiprofessional Team , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[164]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Physical Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Bases for Swedish Physiotherapists' Choice of Treatment , 1992 .

[165]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[166]  Judith Green,et al.  The use of focus groups in research into health , 2007 .

[167]  A. House,et al.  Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[168]  S. Brauer,et al.  Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[169]  Els R Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Health behavior change models and theories: contributions to rehabilitation , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[170]  Babette Linquist,et al.  Motor Learning Concepts and Applications, 6th ed, , 2002 .

[171]  S. Mantzoukas,et al.  Issues of Representation within Qualitative Inquiry , 2004, Qualitative health research.

[172]  R. Nudo Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[173]  Tammy Hoffmann,et al.  Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[174]  J. McNeil,et al.  Informal Care for Stroke Survivors: Results From the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) , 2002, Stroke.

[175]  D M Thomas,et al.  Effects of Relative Frequency of Knowledge of Results on Brain Injured and Control Subjects Learning a Linear Positioning Task , 1995 .

[176]  Deborah Mazhindu Statistics for Healthcare Professionals: An Introduction , 2005 .

[177]  E. Lindeman,et al.  Spouses’ Quality of Life 1 Year after Stroke: Prediction at the Start of Clinical Rehabilitation , 2005, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[178]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[179]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[180]  C. Anderson,et al.  Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? results of a randomized controlled trial : I: health outcomes at 6 months. , 2000, Stroke.

[181]  E. Tunik,et al.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[182]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[183]  Elizabeth Kendall,et al.  Recovery following stroke: the role of self-management education. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[184]  D. S. Fraser,et al.  Mixed reality environments in stroke rehabilitation: Development as rehabilitation tools , 2004 .

[185]  Judith Sixsmith,et al.  Accessing the Community: Gaining Insider Perspectives From the Outside , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[186]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[187]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[188]  D. Wade,et al.  Evidence relating to goal planning in rehabilitation , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[189]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Pathophysiology of Stroke Rehabilitation: Temporal Aspects of Neurofunctional Recovery , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[190]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Virtual Rehabilitation in an Activity Centre for Community-Dwelling Persons with Stroke , 2008, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[191]  Stephanie Kemna,et al.  Developing a user interface for the iPAM stroke rehabilitation system , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[192]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Virtual reality rehabilitation for all: Vivid GX versus Sony PlayStation II EyeToy , 2004 .

[193]  T. Olsen,et al.  Early home-supported discharge of stroke patients: A health technology assessment , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[194]  Chris Ham,et al.  The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system , 2010, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[195]  L. von Koch,et al.  Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: the importance of context. , 1998, Disability and rehabilitation.

[196]  Michelle J. Johnson,et al.  Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[197]  K. Lorig,et al.  Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[198]  C. Burton,et al.  Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[199]  A Ashburn,et al.  The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[200]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach, 4th ed. , 2008 .

[201]  H. Schiffman Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach , 1976 .

[202]  Jack Parker,et al.  An Investigation into Stroke Patients’ Utilisation of Feedback from Computer-based Technology , 2010 .

[203]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text , 2000 .

[204]  M. Periard,et al.  Lifestyle changes and coping patterns among caregivers of stroke survivors. , 1993, Public health nursing.

[205]  P. Verschure,et al.  New Technologies and Concepts for Rehabilitation in the Acute Phase of Stroke: A Collaborative Matrix , 2007, Neurodegenerative Diseases.

[206]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Unit Care Followed by Early Supported Discharge , 2009, Stroke.

[207]  A Ashburn,et al.  Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a survey within the UK , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[208]  Eric Latimer,et al.  Costs and Caregiver Consequences of Early Supported Discharge for Stroke Patients , 2003, Stroke.

[209]  R. Harwood,et al.  A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and SF-36 , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[210]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[211]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Inertial and magnetic sensing of human movement near ferromagnetic materials , 2003, The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[212]  S. Pierce,et al.  Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke. , 2007, NeuroRehabilitation.

[213]  R. Harwood,et al.  The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[214]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[215]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[216]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[217]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Continuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[218]  M Nolan,et al.  'You do know he's had a stroke, don't you?' Preparation for family care-giving--the neglected dimension. , 2000, Journal of clinical nursing.

[219]  Knut Engedal,et al.  Emotional symptoms in acute ischemic stroke , 2006, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[220]  G. Wulf,et al.  Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[221]  Toni Giorgino,et al.  Wireless Support to Poststroke Rehabilitation: MyHeart's Neurological Rehabilitation Concept , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[222]  U Talvitie,et al.  Socio-affective characteristics and properties of extrinsic feedback in physiotherapy. , 2000, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[223]  M A Chamberlain,et al.  Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[224]  G. Kwakkel Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[225]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[226]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Impact of explicit information on implicit motor-sequence learning following middle cerebral artery stroke. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[227]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Stroke services: a global perspective , 2014 .

[228]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[229]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. , 1996 .

[230]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  SMART project: Application of emerging information and communication technology to home-based rehabilitation for stroke patients , 2006 .

[231]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[232]  M. Levin,et al.  Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of its Effectiveness for Upper Limb Motor Recovery , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[233]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[234]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[235]  C. Wolfe,et al.  The Concept of Patient Motivation: A Qualitative Analysis of Stroke Professionals’ Attitudes , 2002, Stroke.

[236]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice , 2006 .

[237]  M. V. von Arbin,et al.  Spasticity After Stroke: Its Occurrence and Association With Motor Impairments and Activity Limitations , 2003, Stroke.

[238]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[239]  Ella McLafferty,et al.  A review of the early discharge experiences of stroke survivors and their carers. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[240]  W. Harwin,et al.  The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[241]  D. Whitehead Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd edition , 2003 .

[242]  J. Sim Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology , 1996 .

[243]  Charles Abraham,et al.  The UK national institute for health and clinical excellence public health guidance on behaviour change: A brief introduction , 2009, Psychology, health & medicine.

[244]  P. Enderby,et al.  Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: validity and comparability. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[245]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Providing explicit information disrupts implicit motor learning after basal ganglia stroke. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[246]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[247]  Nahid Golafshani,et al.  Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2003 .

[248]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[249]  Alan Sunderland,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a non-immersive virtual environment in stroke rehabilitation , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[250]  M. Levin,et al.  Feedback and Cognition in Arm Motor Skill Reacquisition After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[251]  K. J. Miller,et al.  Goal-directed training: linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[252]  S. Zarit,et al.  Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. , 1980, The Gerontologist.

[253]  R. Willmann,et al.  Home Stroke Rehabilitation for the Upper Limbs , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[254]  Fadhel Kaboub Realistic Evaluation , 2004 .

[255]  F. Nouri,et al.  An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients , 1987 .

[256]  J. Kitzinger The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[257]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  Validity of the extended activities of daily living scale , 1994 .

[258]  S. Fasoli,et al.  Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. , 2002, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[259]  S. Dean,et al.  Purposes and mechanisms of goal planning in rehabilitation: The need for a critical distinction , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[260]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.