Strategy and pattern recognition in expert comprehension of 2×2 interaction graphs

I present a model of expert comprehension performance for 2x2 ''interaction'' graphs typically used to present data from two-way factorial research designs. Developed using the ACT-R cognitive architecture, the model simulates the cognitive and perceptual operations involved in interpreting interaction graphs and provides a detailed characterisation of the information extracted from the diagram, the prior knowledge required to interpret interaction graphs, and the knowledge generated during the comprehension process. The model produces a scan path of attention fixations and a symbolic description of the interpretation which can be compared to human eye movement and verbal protocol data respectively, provides an account of the strategic processes that control comprehension, and makes explicit what underlies the differences between expert and novice performance.

[1]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  Task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations , 1991, TOGS.

[2]  Glenn Gunzelmann,et al.  Introduction to the Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[3]  David Peebles,et al.  Differences in comprehensibility between three-variable bar and line graphs , 2009 .

[4]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Graph Design for the Eye and Mind , 2006 .

[5]  A. Aron,et al.  Statistics for Psychology , 1994 .

[6]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Turning pictures into numbers: extracting and generating information from complex visualizations , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  D J Gillan,et al.  A Componential Model of Human Interaction with Graphs: 1. Linear Regression Modeling , 1994, Human factors.

[8]  John R. Anderson.  How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[9]  Alan D Samples,et al.  SOAR Architecture , 1985 .

[10]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[11]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[13]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Priti Shah,et al.  Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[16]  Jeffery. M. Zacks,et al.  Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[17]  M. Wertheimer.  Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[18]  Steven Pinker,et al.  A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .

[19]  S. Kosslyn.  Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .

[20]  C. K. Ogden.  A Source Book Of Gestalt Psychology , 2013 .

[21]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[22]  James L. McClelland.  The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Roy Freedle.  A Theory of Graph Comprehension , 2014 .

[24]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  CaMeRa: A Computational Model of Multiple Representations , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Task and Graphical Representation on Response Latency in a Graph Reading Task , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[26]  David Peebles,et al.  The Effect of Gestalt Laws of Perceptual Organization on the Comprehension of Three-Variable Bar and Line Graphs , 2013, Hum. Factors.