Language and its interacting components: The right hemisphere hypothesis in derivational morphology

Traditionally, it has been assumed that language is part of a distributed neural system largely lateralized to the left cerebral hemisphere. However, more recent studies have challenged the traditional hypothesis supporting a more interactive view of language processing. Instead of considering the language faculty as modular and independent from other cognitive functions, it is hypothesized that language makes use of other cognitive domains. This issue has also been specifically addressed in derivational morphology processing, a language task traditionally considered purely linguistic. Very recently, in a group of Italian non-aphasic right brain-damaged (RBD) subjects, a selective deficit in deriving nouns from verbs (e.g. osservare [to observe] --> osservazione [observation]) was reported. It was attributed to damage to response selection and inhibition mechanisms required by the derivational task. The aim of the present study was to investigate this issue further. Twelve RBD subjects, six of whom were selectively impaired in deriving nouns from verbs, and six healthy controls were asked to perform a response selection task that required the activation of facilitatory and inhibitory components. Results showed that subjects with a derivational morphological deficit exhibited slower reaction times than the subjects in the other RBD group only when they had to inhibit the expected response to select the correct answer. Moreover, lesion analysis revealed the involvement of the right subcortical structures. The relationship between derivational morphology and response selection mechanisms in the right hemisphere is discussed within the view of inter-hemispheric cooperation between different cognitive domains in language tasks.

[1]  William Badecker,et al.  A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation , 1989 .

[2]  Joanna E. Castner,et al.  Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on noun/verb generation and selection from competing alternatives in Parkinson’s disease , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[3]  E. Renzi,et al.  Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test , 1978, Cortex.

[4]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[5]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  L. Colombo,et al.  The Influence of Age of Acquisition, Root Frequency, and Context Availability in Processing Nouns and Verbs , 2002, Brain and Language.

[7]  Leonard Katz,et al.  Processing differences between nouns, adjectives, and verbs , 1987, Psychological research.

[8]  Antonia Chandrasegaran,et al.  Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[9]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence from vascular and degenerative conditions. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Joel Kramer,et al.  Role of frontal cortex in inferential reasoning: Evidence from the Word Context Test , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  R. Sperry,et al.  Language after section of the cerebral commissures. , 1967, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Matti Laine,et al.  Left hemisphere activation during processing of morphologically complex word forms in adults , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions Using Cost Function Masking , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language , 1999 .

[16]  Marcella Laiacona,et al.  Tre test clinici di memoria verbale a lungo termine: Taratura su soggetti normali. , 1986 .

[17]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Toward a comprehensive diagnosis of visual-spatial disorders in unilateral brain damaged patients. , 1989 .

[18]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: An open-protocol study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[19]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Morphological Structure and Lexical Access. , 1984 .

[20]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological Processes in language Comprehension , 2007 .

[21]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology , 1988, Brain and Language.

[22]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Free Use of Derivational Morphology in an Italian Jargonaphasic , 1990 .

[24]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  K. Forster,et al.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[27]  Pierre Villiard,et al.  Morphology, Phonology and Aphasia , 1990 .

[28]  Laura Monetta,et al.  Semantic processing of words, cognitive resources and N400: An event-related potentials study , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[30]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  Deficits on irregular verbal morphology in Italian-speaking Alzheimer's disease patients , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Miceli Gabriele,et al.  Batteria per l'analisi dei deficit afasici. B.A.D.A. , 1994 .

[32]  Richard W Briggs,et al.  Left and right basal ganglia and frontal activity during language generation: Contributions to lexical, semantic, and phonological processes , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[33]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  L. Murray The Effects of Varying Attentional Demands on the Word Retrieval Skills of Adults with Aphasia, Right Hemisphere Brain Damage, or No Brain Damage , 2000, Brain and Language.

[35]  Cristina Burani,et al.  The Right Hemisphere Involvement in the Processing of Morphologically Derived Words , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  William Hirst,et al.  Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology , 1984, Brain and Language.

[37]  T. Shallice,et al.  Supervisory and Routine Processes in Noun and Verb Generation in Nondemented Patients with Parkinson's Disease , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  D. Zaidel,et al.  The Interpretation of Sentence Ambiguity in Patients with Unilateral Focal Brain Surgery , 1995, Brain and Language.

[39]  M. Regard,et al.  Language in the right cerebral hemisphere: contributions from reading studies. , 2003, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[40]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Derivational Morphology , 2006, Cortex.

[41]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The structural components of music perception. A functional anatomical study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Roger Wales,et al.  An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage , 1986, Brain and Language.

[43]  E Capitani,et al.  Raven's coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adult normal controls. , 1987, Functional neurology.

[44]  R. Buckner Beyond HERA: Contributions of specific prefrontal brain areas to long-term memory retrieval , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  R. Krikorian,et al.  Tower of London procedure: a standard method and developmental data. , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[46]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Grammatical Gender: An fMRI Investigation , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  M T Ullman,et al.  The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[48]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[50]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[51]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Does Global Context Modulate Cerebral Asymmetries? A Review and New Evidence on Word Imageability Effects , 2001, Brain and Language.

[52]  R. Zatorre,et al.  When that tune runs through your head: a PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[54]  M. Koivisto Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociations in Processing Past Tense Morphology: Neuropathology and Behavioral Studies , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Pierre Goulet,et al.  Criterion-specific reduction of verbal fluency in right brain-damaged right-handers , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  C. Papagno,et al.  Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[58]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Paola Marangolo,et al.  Dissociations in processing derivational morphology: The right basal ganglia involvement , 2008, Neuropsychologia.