Future prediction & estimation of faults occurrences in oil pipelines by using data clustering with time series forecasting

Abstract The world of oil pipelines is subjected to serious issues due to occurrences of toxic spills, explosions and deformations like particle deposition, corrosions and cracks due to the contact of oil particles with the pipeline surface. Hence, the structural integrity of these pipelines is of great interest due to the probable environmental, infrastructural and financial losses in case of structural failure. Based on the existing technology, it is difficult to analyze the risks at the initial stage, since traditional methods are only appropriate for static accident analyses. Nevertheless, most of these models have used corrosion features alone to assess the condition of pipelines. To sort out the above problem in the oil pipelines, fault identification and prediction methods based on K-means clustering and Time-series forecasting incorporated with linear regression algorithm using multiple pressure data are proposed in this paper. The real-time validation of the proposed technique is validated using a scaled-down experimental hardware lab setup resembling characteristics exhibited by onshore unburied pipeline in India. In the proposed work, crack and blockages are identified by taking pressure rise and pressure drop inferred from two cluster assignment. The obtained numerical results from K-means clustering unveils that maximum datasets accumulated range of multiple pressures are within 16.147–10.638 kg/cm2, 14.922–12.1674 kg/cm2, 2.7645–1.2063 kg/cm2 correspondingly. Hence by this final cluster center data, inspection engineers able to estimate the normal and abnormal performance of oil transportation in a simple-robust manner. The developed forecast model successfully predicts future fault occurrences rate followed by dissimilarity rate from clustering results holds the validity of 91.9% when applied to the historical pressure datasets. The models are expected to help pipeline operators without complex computation processing to assess and predict the condition of existing oil pipelines and hence prioritize the planning of their inspection and rehabilitation.

[1]  E. B. Priyanka,et al.  Online Monitoring and Control of Flow rate in Oil Pipelines Transportation System by using PLC based Fuzzy‐PID Controller , 2018, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation.

[2]  E. B. Priyanka,et al.  Proactive Decision Making Based IoT Framework for an Oil Pipeline Transportation System , 2018 .

[3]  E. B. Priyanka,et al.  Multiple regression analysis for the prediction of extraction efficiency in mining industry with industrial IoT , 2020, Production Engineering.

[4]  P. Davis,et al.  Subsea pipeline infrastructure monitoring: A framework for technology review and selection , 2015 .

[5]  E. B. Priyanka,et al.  Integrating IoT with LQR-PID controller for online surveillance and control of flow and pressure in fluid transportation system , 2020, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[6]  E. Bhaskaran Priyanka,et al.  A smart‐integrated IoT module for intelligent transportation in oil industry , 2020, International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields.

[7]  Maheswari Chennippan,et al.  Vibration Signals Based Bearing Defects Identification Through Online Monitoring Using LABVIEW , 2020 .

[8]  Christopher Nwagboso,et al.  Framework for integrated oil pipeline monitoring and incident mitigation systems , 2017 .

[9]  Wei Liang,et al.  The application of integrated diagnosis database technology in safety management of oil pipeline and transferring pump units , 2009 .

[10]  B. Karney,et al.  Wavelet processing of transient signals for pipeline leak location and quantification , 2016 .

[11]  Panu Hämäläinen,et al.  Design and Implementation of Low-Area and Low-Power AES Encryption Hardware Core , 2006, 9th EUROMICRO Conference on Digital System Design (DSD'06).

[12]  Marco Pirola,et al.  A novel smart caliper foam pig for low-cost pipeline inspection—Part A: Design and laboratory characterization , 2015 .

[13]  A. Saniere,et al.  Pipeline Transportation of Heavy Oils, a Strategic, Economic and Technological Challenge , 2004 .

[14]  E. B. Priyanka,et al.  Remote monitoring and control of LQR-PI controller parameters for an oil pipeline transport system , 2019, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[15]  O. V. Trevisan,et al.  Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering AN OVERVIEW OF HEAVY OIL PROPERTIES AND ITS RECOVERY AND TRANSPORTATION METHODS , 2014 .

[16]  Katarzyna Stolecka,et al.  Reducing the risk level for pipelines transporting carbon dioxide and hydrogen by means of optimal safety valves spacing , 2015 .

[17]  R. Goodland,et al.  Oil and Gas Pipelines Social and Environmental Impact Assessment: State of the Art , 2006 .

[18]  N. Georgescu-Roegen Energy Analysis and Economic Valuation , 1979 .

[19]  Najmedin Meshkati,et al.  Organizational and Safety Factors in Automated Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems , 2019, Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems.

[20]  A. Eslami,et al.  A review on pipeline corrosion, in-line inspection (ILI), and corrosion growth rate models , 2017 .

[21]  Thangavel Subramaniam,et al.  Local Intelligence for Remote Surveillance and Control of Flow in Fluid Transportation System , 2019, Advances in Modelling and Analysis C.

[22]  Sandra Lucia da Cruz,et al.  Pressure wave behaviour and leak detection in pipelines , 1996 .

[23]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Open-source machine learning: R meets Weka , 2009, Comput. Stat..

[24]  Mandeep Kaur,et al.  A K-Means Based Clustering Approach for Finding Faulty Modules in Open Source Software Systems , 2010 .

[25]  C. Maheswari,et al.  Parameter monitoring and control during petrol transportation using PLC based PID controller , 2016 .