Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: potential for virtual rehabilitation.

Functional arm movements, such as reaching while standing, are planned and executed according to our perception of body position in space and are relative to environmental objects. The angle under which the environment is observed is one component used in creating this perception. This suggests that manipulation of viewing angle may modulate whole body movement to affect performance. We tested this by comparing its effect on reaching in a virtually generated environment. Eleven young healthy individuals performed forward and lateral reaches in the virtual environment, presented on a flat screen in third-person perspective. Participants saw a computer-generated model (avatar) of themselves standing in a courtyard facing a semi-circular hedge with flowers. The image was presented in five different viewing angles ranging from seeing the avatar from behind (0 degrees), to viewing from overhead (90 degrees). Participants attempted to touch the furthest flower possible without losing balance or stepping. Kinematic data were collected to analyze endpoint displacement, arm-postural coordination and center of mass (COM) displacement. Results showed that reach distance was greatest with angular perspectives of approximately 45-77.5 degrees , which are larger than those used in analogous real world situations. Larger reaches were characterized by increased involvement of leg and trunk body segments, altered inter-segmental coordination, and decreased inter-segmental movement time lag. Thus a viewing angle can be a critical visuomotor variable modulating motor coordination of the whole body and related functional performance. These results can be used in designing virtual reality games, in ergonomic design, teleoperation training, and in designing virtual rehabilitation programs that re-train functional movement in vulnerable individuals.

[1]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The Effect of Automated Compensation for Incongruent Axes on Teleoperator Performance , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[2]  K. Lashley Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. , 1930 .

[3]  G. Burdea,et al.  Low-cost Virtual Rehabilitation of the Hand for Patients Post-Stroke , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[4]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  Examining the Effects of Postural Constraints on Estimating Reach , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Heidi Sveistrup,et al.  Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Virtual reality environments to enhance upper limb functional recovery in patients with hemiparesis. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Motor Preparation of Manual Aiming at a Visual Target Manipulated in Size, Luminance Contrast, and Location , 2007, Perception.

[9]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Eye position signals modulate early dorsal and ventral visual areas. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[11]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  The benefits of third-person perspective in virtual and augmented reality? , 2006, VRST '06.

[12]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Experiments with attitude: attitude displays for teleoperation , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[13]  Zhou Qian Effects of Field Viewing Angles on Object Jubgerent in Virtual Environment , 2003 .

[14]  Belen'kiĭ Ve,et al.  Control elements of voluntary movements , 1967 .

[15]  G. Cheron,et al.  Does the coordination between posture and movement during human whole-body reaching ensure center of mass stabilization? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Zoï Kapoula,et al.  Effects of distance and gaze position on postural stability in young and old subjects , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  S. Celebrini,et al.  Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  S. Kinomura,et al.  PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Tien-Yow Chuang,et al.  Use of Virtual Reality to Improve Upper-Extremity Control in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Single-Subject Design , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[21]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[22]  Michael McNeill,et al.  Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: the user's perspective , 2004 .

[23]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Schema design and implementation of the grasp-related mirror neuron system , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system and action recognition , 2003 .

[25]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Planning and online control of goal directed movements when the eyes are ‘relocated’ , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  S. Studenski,et al.  Functional Reach: A Marker of Physical Frailty , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[27]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Pamela S. Haibach,et al.  Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Jerome N. Sanes,et al.  Gaze influences finger movement-related and visual-related activation across the human brain , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[31]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  D. Ullrich,et al.  Horizontal and vertical reading: a comparative investigation of eye movements. , 1993, German journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  K. Shieh,et al.  Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[35]  W. Medendorp,et al.  Behavioral and cortical mechanisms for spatial coding and action planning , 2008, Cortex.

[36]  J. McComas,et al.  Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: Perceptions of participants and their caregivers , 2005, Brain injury.

[37]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Gaze Direction Modulates Finger Movement Activation Patterns in Human Cerebral Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Fahle,et al.  Effects of visual illusions on grasping. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. Gibson The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. , 1994, Psychological review.

[40]  John M. Allman,et al.  The Effect of Gaze Angle and Fixation Distance on the Responses of Neurons in V1, V2, and V4 , 2002, Neuron.

[41]  J. Massion Postural control system , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[42]  V. Gurfinkel,et al.  [Control elements of voluntary movements]. , 1967, Biofizika.

[43]  T. Kaminski The coupling between upper and lower extremity synergies during whole body reaching. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[44]  David N. Lee Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[45]  S. Studenski,et al.  Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[46]  Robert D. McIntosh,et al.  Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for programming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia II (of III) , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[48]  Arnold Mitnitski,et al.  Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Use of a Low-Cost, Commercially Available Gaming Console (Wii) for Rehabilitation of an Adolescent With Cerebral Palsy , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[50]  H. Stam,et al.  ''Playstation eyetoy games'' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2008, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[51]  Heidi Sveistrup,et al.  Feasibility, Motivation, and Selective Motor Control: Virtual Reality Compared to Conventional Home Exercise in Children with Cerebral Palsy , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[52]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Yoshinori Doi,et al.  Modification of the functional reach test: analysis of lateral and anterior functional reach in community-dwelling older people. , 2006, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[54]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Virtual reality rehabilitation for all: Vivid GX versus Sony PlayStation II EyeToy , 2004 .

[55]  Paul J. Stapley,et al.  Coordination between equilibrium and hand trajectories during whole body pointing movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.