Femoral Neck Length and Hip Fracture Risk

To determine whether there are differences in femoral skeletal geometry in fracture‐prone subjects when size, positioning diagnosis, and age are controlled, we compared femoral measurements made from the uninvolved hip on 119 plane anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of women without fracture to those of the contralateral hip in a group of 43 female patients with hip fractures (neck, 23; intertrochanteric, 20). The hip was imaged in a standardized position of rotation and adduction. Race, age, and musculoskeletal diagnosis were known. Subjects were grouped by diagnosis of the opposite hip condition (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and normal) and compared. Measurements were also analyzed as ratios to head diameter (HD), neck diameter (ND), and pelvic width. Femoral neck length (NL) was measured from skeletal preparations and imaged in controlled positions of abduction and external rotation. No differences were found between the neck and intertrochanteric fracture groups. The differences between the fracture group and the controls were a thinner femoral cortex (measured at a point one head radius below the lesser trochanter) a larger femoral head, and a larger femoral ND in the fracture group (p < 0.025). The difference in cortical thickness was still significant when scaled by size, but the ratio of HD to ND was equivalent in fractures and controls. No difference in femoral NL could be demonstrated. The experimental measurements showed that apparent NL is significantly position sensitive and this may explain previously reported differences in fracture‐prone groups.

[1]  H. Meyer,et al.  BODY HEIGHT, BODY MASS INDEX, AND FATAL HIP FRACTURES: 16 YEARS' FOLLOW‐UP OF 674,000 NORWEGIAN WOMEN AND MEN , 1995, Epidemiology.

[2]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Factors contributing to skeletal health of postmenopausal Mexican‐American women , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  S. Cummings,et al.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  I. Clarke,et al.  Improved methods for quantitative radiographic evaluation with particular reference to total-hip arthroplasty. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  P. Leyvraz,et al.  The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  W. Muirhead-Allwood,et al.  Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: Differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  I. Reid,et al.  Relation between increase in length of hip axis in older women between 1950s and 1990s and increase in age specific rates of hip fracture , 1994, BMJ.

[9]  C. Ruff,et al.  Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I: Temporal trends and mechanical interpretation. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  R. Senie,et al.  Low body weight as a risk factor for hip fracture in both black and white women , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? , 1996, Bone.

[12]  C C Glüer,et al.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: The study of osteoporotic fractures , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  J. G. Horne,et al.  The relationship between proximal femoral anatomy and osteoarthrosis of the hip. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  T. Yoshikawa,et al.  Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between japanese and white americans? , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  O Johnell,et al.  Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. , 1996, Bone.

[16]  R. Steinberg,et al.  Osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck in Jerusalem. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  D. Gray,et al.  Value of screening for secondary causes of hyperlipidaemia in general practice , 1994, BMJ.

[18]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  G. Colditz,et al.  Body height and hip fracture: a cohort study of 90,000 women. , 1995, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  C C Glüer,et al.  Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: The study of osteoporotic fractures , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  O Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. , 1996, BMJ.