Mismatch repair deficiency and prognostic significance in patients with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers

Objectives Mismatch repair deficiency is observed in 25%–30% of all endometrial cancers. This can be detected by the absence of mismatch repair protein staining on immunohistochemistry, and is used as a screen for Lynch syndrome. Only 10% of women with mismatch repair deficiency have Lynch syndrome, but mismatch repair deficiency may still have prognostic significance. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between mismatch repair-deficient and mismatch repair-proficient low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2). Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2) from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region from February 2011 to January 2016 that were assessed for mismatch repair deficiency. Any other histology, stage, or grade was excluded from the study. Primary outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the association between mismatch repair deficiency and recurrence and death after adjustment for covariates, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary outcome measures were recurrence rates expressed per 100 person-years (p100py). Results There were 475 patients diagnosed with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, including 131 with mismatch repair-deficient (27.6%) and 344 with mismatch repair-proficient (72.4%) tumors. Women with mismatch repair-deficient tumors had worse progression-free survival (24 months; p=0.0082) and higher recurrence rates (3.56 p100py) compared with those with mismatch repair-proficient tumors (27 months; 1.21 p100py, p=0.04). The absolute number of recurrences was overall low. There were 11 recurrences out of 131 mismatch repair-deficient cases (8.4%) and 14 out of 344 mismatch repair proficient cases (4.1%). After adjustment for age, lymphovascular space invasion status, adjuvant therapy, and post-operative grade, mismatch repair-deficient status remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.95). There was no significant difference in overall survival between mismatch repair groups (mismatch repair-proficient group 27.5 months vs 25.0 months in the deficient group) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.10). Conclusion In low-risk stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers, mismatch repair deficiency is associated with a higher recurrence rate than mismatch repair proficiency after adjustment for covariates, implying that mismatch repair deficiency reflects a different biology in endometrial cancer.

[1]  J. McAlpine,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency identifies patients with high‐intermediate–risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer at the highest risk of recurrence: A prognostic biomarker , 2018, Cancer.

[3]  J. McAlpine,et al.  Does MMR status in endometrial cancer influence response to adjuvant therapy? , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[4]  A. Spurdle,et al.  Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status , 2018, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[5]  A. Spurdle,et al.  ER and PR expression and survival after endometrial cancer. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  Wei Chen,et al.  Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 in endometrial cancers is associated with larger tumor volume, increased rate of lymph node positivity and reduced recurrence-free survival. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer , 2017, Cancer.

[8]  D. Tritchler,et al.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Clinicopathologic implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  R. Broaddus,et al.  Defective DNA Mismatch Repair Influences Expression of Endometrial Carcinoma Biomarkers , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[11]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  Alexander M. Metcalf,et al.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  X. Matías-Guiu,et al.  Mismatch repair status and clinical outcome in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[15]  South East Water Who we serve , 2012 .

[16]  H. Harris,et al.  NKT Cells in Sepsis , 2010, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[17]  Poonam K Sharma,et al.  Current Hypotheses on How Microsatellite Instability Leads to Enhanced Survival of Lynch Syndrome Patients , 2010, Clinical & developmental immunology.

[18]  I. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and prognostic impact of microsatellite instability in a large population-based study of endometrial carcinomas. , 2000, Cancer research.

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .