How might the brain represent complex symbolic knowledge?

A novel category of theories is proposed, providing a potential explanation for the representation of complex knowledge in the human (and, more generally, mammalian) brain. Firstly, a "glocal" representation for concepts is suggested, involving localized representations in a sparse network of "concept neurons" in the Medial Temporal Lobe, coupled with a complex dynamical attractor representation in other parts of cortex. Secondly, it is hypothesized that a combi-natory logic like representation is used to encode abstract relationships without explicit use of variable bindings, perhaps using systematic asynchronization among concept neurons to indicate an analogue of the combinatory-logic operation of function application. While unraveling the specifics of the brain's knowledge representation mechanisms will require data beyond what is currently available, the approach presented here provides a class of possibilities that is neurally plausible and bridges the gap between neurophysiological realities and mathematical and computer science concepts.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[2]  George Christos Memory and Dreams: The Creative Human Mind , 2003 .

[3]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Thermodynamic Model of Criticality in the Cortex Based On EEG/ECOG Data , 2012, 1206.1108.

[4]  C. Utilizing Time : Asynchronous Binding , 1998 .

[5]  Luo Fei,et al.  Wastewater DO Concentration Control through NH4 Prediction Based on Evolutionary Radial Basis Function Neural Network , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[6]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Getting symbols out of a neural architecture , 2011, Connect. Sci..

[7]  L. Shastri,et al.  From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Guang Li,et al.  Application of Chaotic Neural Model Based on Olfactory System on Pattern Recognitions , 2005, ICNC.

[9]  F. van der Velde,et al.  Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Ben Goertzel,et al.  Engineering General Intelligence, Part 1: A Path to Advanced AGI via Embodied Learning and Cognitive Synergy , 2014 .

[11]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  A (Somewhat) New Solution to the Binding Problem , 2006 .

[12]  Antony Browne,et al.  Connectionist variable binding , 1999, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[13]  Susan A Greenfield,et al.  A neuroscientific approach to consciousness. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[14]  Cassio Pennachin,et al.  Glocal memory: A critical design principle for artificial brains and minds , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[15]  Ben Goertzel,et al.  Engineering General Intelligence, Part 2: The CogPrime Architecture for Integrative, Embodied AGI , 2014 .

[16]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[17]  William C. Frederick,et al.  A Combinatory Logic , 1995 .

[18]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Utilizing lime: Asynchronous Binding , 1998, NIPS.

[19]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Jerome Feldman,et al.  The neural binding problem(s) , 2013, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[21]  Geraint Rees,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Consciousness , 2003 .

[22]  R. Quiroga Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  L. Shastri Episodic memory and cortico–hippocampal interactions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  P. Bernays,et al.  Zum Entscheidungsproblem der mathematischen Logik , 1928 .