PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES
To examine oncology care providers' knowledge of tattooing options for patients who have elected to have breast reconstruction as part of their breast cancer treatment.
.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING
A large metropolitan cancer center in New York and various locations across the United States
.
SAMPLE
68 oncology care providers who work with women with breast cancer, distributed into two groups.
METHODS
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize online survey responses for the two groups, with inferential comparisons made with logistic regression models
.
MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES
Healthcare profession, discussion of reconstructive tattoo options with patients, knowledge of providers of reconstructive tattoos outside of traditional healthcare settings, and recommendations made to patients
.
FINDINGS
RNs were significantly less likely to recommend a professional tattoo artist to a patient than non-RNs, despite a similar proportion of both groups believing that a tattoo artist would provide the patient with a better tattoo than healthcare providers (HCPs).
CONCLUSIONS
Additional research is needed to identify education deficits in HCPs regarding tattoo reconstruction options. HCPs are recommending potentially substandard options for nipple-areola tattooing, even though many believe that tattoo artists, who are outside of the traditional healthcare setting, could provide better outcomes for patients.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
Nurses and other HCPs require additional education about nipple-areola tattoo options for patients following breast cancer surgery
.
[1]
D. Cope.
Using electronic surveys in nursing research.
,
2014,
Oncology nursing forum.
[2]
E. Halvorson,et al.
Three-Dimensional Nipple-Areola Tattooing: A New Technique with Superior Results
,
2014,
Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
[3]
Guyonne Kalb,et al.
A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors
,
2011,
BMC medical research methodology.
[4]
N. Martin,et al.
Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing.
,
2011,
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.
[5]
N. Novo,et al.
Quality-of-Life and Self-Esteem Outcomes after Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery [Outcomes Article]
,
2010,
Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
[6]
S. Cawthorn,et al.
Patient satisfaction and time-saving implications of a nurse-led nipple and areola reconstitution service following breast reconstruction.
,
2007,
Breast.
[7]
J. Clarkson,et al.
The patient's experience of a nurse-led nipple tattoo service: a successful program in Warwickshire.
,
2006,
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.
[8]
M. B. Walker,et al.
Women Who Wish Breast Reconstruction: Characteristics, Fears, and Hopes
,
2003,
Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
[9]
Tomer Z. Karas,et al.
Nipple‐Areola Reconstruction: Satisfaction and Clinical Determinants
,
2002,
Plastic and reconstructive surgery.