Human Aspects of NPP Operator Teamwork

The aim of this Chapter is to describe several important human aspects of NPP operator teams that have significant effect on safe and efficient operations. The first part of the Chapter provides an overview about the concept of high reliability organisations, safety culture, focusing on the question how to conceptualise and measure safety culture, presenting two distinct perspectives about background of human unsafe acts. Based on theoretical and empirical works made in high reliability organisations, the second part of the Chapter aims to detail the paradox of human factors, describing the main task, job and teamwork characteristics of first line personnel. The first line personnel in the NPP control room works in team. There have been several attempts to describe the characteristics of efficient teamwork, although little is known about the antecedents of efficient teamwork in high reliability organisation. Based on the InputProcess-Output model the empirical works aim to understand those inputs and processes that determine safe and efficient operator teamwork. After the theoretical considerations, the chapter synthesise different empirical works made in NPP control room analysing operator teamwork from different perspectives. Based on the theoretical works about specific task loads, the goal of Case study is to identify particular sources of task load, as inputs that influence operators well being. The revealed list of task load offers a practical guidance how to enhance operators’ well-being, safe and efficient work performance. Another important input of operator teamwork is the team members’ personality. Even though the NPP environment is strongly standardised, providing little room for individuals’ personality, team members’ characteristics influence how they behave and perform in this restricted environment. Based on Five Factor Model of personality the goal of Research 1 is to determine those personality traits that count for efficient teamwork, relating personality to team communication, to behavioural markers of team members, and performance. Operator team is a professional work team, requiring the interaction of team members representing different areas of speciality. It is important to understand how the operator team members having specific technical and professional knowledge are able to operate and manage jointly the plant system. Communication as a key process is used to share specific technical and human aspects of the plant parameters, operations, establishing the shared knowledge about the plant, environment, task and team members. This shared knowledge helps the operator team to develop joint strategies in order to manage the plant and to share different levels of task load during their operation. Research 2 aims to describe

[1]  Structural Features of Language and Language Use 1 , 2004 .

[2]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[3]  Martina Weber [Personnel selection methods in religious facilities: should colleagues be a church members?]. , 2009, Pflege Zeitschrift.

[4]  Rainer Dietrich,et al.  Group interaction in high risk environments , 2004 .

[5]  Jamie C. Gorman,et al.  Assessment of Team Cognition , 2022 .

[6]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[7]  S. Mohammed,et al.  The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema , 2000 .

[8]  Peter Essens,et al.  Military Command Team Effectiveness: Model and Instrument for Assessment and Improvement (L'efficacite des Equipes de Commandement Militaires: un Modele et un Instrument Pour L'evaluation et L'amelioration) , 2005 .

[9]  Marie Waung,et al.  The Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performance , 1998 .

[10]  P. H. Lodhi,et al.  The Five-Factor Model of Personality , 2002 .

[11]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. , 1998 .

[12]  C. Argyris Personality and organization , 1957 .

[13]  Sexton Jb,et al.  Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload. , 2000 .

[14]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers , 2001 .

[15]  S. K. Horwitz The Compositional Impact of Team Diversity on Performance: Theoretical Considerations , 2005 .

[16]  Vanessa Mills,et al.  Implicit Communication in Novice and Expert Teams , 2003 .

[17]  Franziska Tschan,et al.  All in the Timing , 2008 .

[18]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[19]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[20]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS ASPECTS OF TEAM COGNITION , 2004 .

[21]  P. Costa,et al.  NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual , 2010 .

[22]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[23]  R. Piedmont,et al.  Predicting Supervisor Ratings of Job Performance Using the NEO Personality Inventory , 1994 .

[24]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 2006 .

[25]  R Flin,et al.  Development of a rating system for surgeons' non‐technical skills , 2006, Medical education.

[26]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[27]  Patrick Grommes,et al.  Contributing to Coherence: An Empirical Study on O.R. Team Communication , 2000 .

[28]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Measuring Team Cognition , 2003 .

[29]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[30]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[31]  R. Flin,et al.  Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[32]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[33]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[34]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Crew resource management: improving team work in high reliability industries , 2002 .

[35]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  The Role of Personality in Group Processes. , 2004 .

[36]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Task Structure and Postcompletion Error in the Execution of a Routine Procedure , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Automating Measurement of Team Cognition through Analysis of Communication Data , 2001 .

[38]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[39]  J. Wagner Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups , 1995 .

[40]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[41]  F. Fiedler Cognitive Resources and Leadership Performance , 1995 .

[42]  N. John Castellan,et al.  Individual and group decision making : current issues , 2013 .

[43]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  J. Bono,et al.  Personality and emotional performance: extraversion, neuroticism, and self-monitoring. , 2007, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[45]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[46]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[47]  J. Hogan,et al.  Conscientiousness and integrity at work , 1997 .

[48]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[49]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Some Promising Results of Communication-Based Automatic Measures of Team Cognition , 2002 .

[50]  R. J. Mumaw,et al.  The effects of stress on nuclear power plant operational decision making and training approaches to reduce stress effects , 1994 .

[51]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  The Relation Between Personality and Contextual Performance in "Strong" Versus "Weak" Situations , 2001 .

[53]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[54]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[55]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Person-Job Fit Applied to Teamwork , 2004 .

[56]  D. Comer A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups , 1995 .

[57]  Patrick Stuart Murray,et al.  LINE OPERATION SAFETY AUDITS (LOSA): DEFINITION AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS , 2003 .

[58]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  A. Banks,et al.  Differentiating knowledge in teams: The effect of shared declarative and procedural knowledge on team performance , 2007 .