FDI entry mode choice of Chinese firms: A strategic behavior perspective

This study investigates the determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) entry mode choice between a wholly owned subsidiary and a joint venture by Chinese firms that invest overseas. We argue that the FDI entry mode choice of a Chinese firm is primarily influenced by the variables related to the firm's strategic fit in host industry and its strategic intent of conducting FDI. Using survey data of a sample of 138 Chinese firms, the results suggest that a Chinese firm prefers wholly owned subsidiary entry mode when it adopts a global strategy, faces severe host industry competition, and emphasizes assets seeking purposes in its FDI. A joint venture is preferred when the firm is investing in a high growth host market.

[1]  Clegg,et al.  The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment , 2007 .

[2]  Hong Liu,et al.  Strategic Implications of Emerging Chinese Multinationals:: The Haier Case Study , 2002 .

[3]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Chinese economic development, the next stage: outward FDI? , 2005 .

[4]  K. R. Harrigan.  Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[5]  Ping Deng,et al.  Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies , 2007 .

[6]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[7]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[8]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[9]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Do you really have a global strategy , 1985 .

[10]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom , 2005 .

[11]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  The nature of multinational firm boundaries: Transaction costs, firm capabilities and foreign market entry mode , 1998 .

[12]  R. Caves.  International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment , 1971 .

[13]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[14]  Shige Makino,et al.  Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure , 2007 .

[15]  Nitin Pangarkar,et al.  Mode of Entry Choice: An Empirical Study of Singaporean Multinationals , 2000 .

[16]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[17]  B Kogut.  Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[18]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  What is the Right Organization Design? , 2006 .

[19]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[20]  Rosalie L. Tung,et al.  International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective , 2007 .

[21]  Christian Homburg,et al.  A Marketing Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions: How Marketing Integration Affects Postmerger Performance , 2005 .

[22]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres.  Multinational ownership strategies , 1985 .

[23]  H. Gatignon,et al.  The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries : an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation , 1988 .

[24]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[25]  Peter Hwang,et al.  An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode , 1990 .

[26]  Franklin R. Root,et al.  Entry strategies for international markets , 1986 .

[27]  John J. Bell.  Single or Joint Venturing?: A Comprehensive Approach to Foreign Entry Mode Choice , 1996 .

[28]  John Child,et al.  The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical Extension? , 2005 .

[29]  Ping Deng.  Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications , 2004 .

[30]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[31]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance , 2002 .

[32]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach , 1990 .

[33]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Implications of Channel Integration in Foreign Markets , 1997 .

[34]  Daphne W. Yiu,et al.  The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[35]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Service Firms’ International Entry-Mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach , 1993 .

[36]  Christian Homburg,et al.  How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customer Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach , 2005 .

[37]  Jing Li,et al.  Will China’s Multinationals Succeed Globally or Regionally? , 2007 .

[38]  Justin Tan,et al.  Environment-Strategy Co-Evolution and Co-Alignment: A Staged Model of Chinese Soes Under Transition , 2005 .

[39]  George S. Yip,et al.  Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective , 2008 .

[40]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change , 2000 .

[41]  S. Ramaswami,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors , 1992 .

[42]  Jedrzej George Frynas,et al.  First mover advantages in international business and firm‐specific political resources , 2006 .

[43]  R. Morck,et al.  Perspectives on China's outward foreign direct investment , 2008 .

[44]  Robert Ferber,et al.  The Problem of Bias in Mail Returns: A Solution , 1948 .

[45]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries : Theory and evidence , 1989 .