Use of Foaming Disinfectants and Cleaners to Reduce Aerobic Bacteria and Salmonella on Poultry Transport Coops

Simple Summary Chicken coops are rarely washed and can soil poultry carcasses with fecal bacteria that may make people sick. Our laboratory applied two commercially available products to experimentally contaminated coops. One product contained bleach, potassium hydroxide and a foaming agent. The other product contained vinegar and hydrogen peroxide and was mixed with a detergent. Both products were applied using a firefighting apparatus known as a compressed air foam system (CAFS). These materials were washed away using a garden hose or pressure washer as the treatments called for. Surface swabs were collected prior to and after each treatment to determine the reduction of bacteria on the surface, which would be an indicator of sanitation. We found that both treatments significantly made the surface cleaner when compared to water alone. The application of these products via a CAFS may be a practical and expedient way to clean and disinfect poultry cages. Abstract Transport coops are infrequently washed and have been demonstrated to cross-contaminate broiler carcasses. We hypothesized that peracetic acid or a chlorinated cleaner, commonly used within poultry processing plants, can also be used to disinfect transport coops when applied via a compressed air foam system (CAFS). A mixture of fresh layer manure and concentrated Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) was evenly applied to the floors of four pre-cleaned transport coops and allowed to dry for thirty minutes. Treatments consisted of a (1) water rinse only, (2) product application with a water rinse, (3) product application followed by power washing and (4) power washing followed by application of product. Each foaming treatment was applied with a compressed air foam system and allowed 10 min of contact time. Samples were aseptically collected from the transport coops prior to and following treatment using a sterile 2 × 2-inch stainless steel template and a gauze swab pre-enriched with buffered peptone water. The chlorinated cleaner significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerobic bacteria and ST by 3.18 to 4.84 logs across application methods. The peroxyacetic acid (PAA) disinfectant significantly (p < 0.05) reduced aerobic bacteria and ST by 3.99 to 5.17 logs across application methods. These data indicate that a compressed air foam system may be used in combination with a commercially available cleaner or disinfectant to reduce aerobic bacteria and ST on the surfaces of commercial poultry transport coops.

[1]  M. Farnell,et al.  Foam or spray application of agricultural chemicals to clean and disinfect layer cages , 2018, Journal of Applied Poultry Research.

[2]  J. Byrd,et al.  Evaluation of layer cage cleaning and disinfection regimens , 2017, Journal of Applied Poultry Research.

[3]  J. Byrd,et al.  Use of a foaming disinfectant and cleaner to reduce aerobic bacteria on poultry transport coops , 2015 .

[4]  J. Carey,et al.  Evaluation of disinfectants commonly used by the commercial poultry industry under simulated field conditions. , 2009, Poultry science.

[5]  L. Miller,et al.  Infectious Disease Management in Animal Shelters , 2009 .

[6]  S. Mckee,et al.  The microbial and quality properties of poultry carcasses treated with peracetic acid as an antimicrobial treatment. , 2008, Poultry science.

[7]  Compliance Guideline for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Poultry Second Edition May 2008 , 2008 .

[8]  J. W. Arnold Bacterial contamination on rubber picker fingers before, during, and after processing. , 2007, Poultry science.

[9]  C. Pope,et al.  Foam-based mass emergency depopulation of floor-reared meat-type poultry operations. , 2007, Poultry science.

[10]  M. Berrang,et al.  Influence of a Chicken Transport Cage-Washing System on Wastewater Characteristics and Bacteria Recovery from Cage Flooring , 2006 .

[11]  I. Vågsholm,et al.  Transmission of Campylobacter spp. to chickens during transport to slaughter , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[12]  M. Berrang,et al.  Use of water spray and extended drying time to lower bacterial numbers on soiled flooring from broiler transport coops. , 2005, Poultry science.

[13]  M. Berrang,et al.  Water Spray and Immersion in Chemical Sanitizer to Lower Bacterial Numbers on Broiler Transport Coop Flooring , 2005 .

[14]  D. L. Fletcher,et al.  Role of dump cage fecal contamination in the transfer of Campylobacter to carcasses of previously negative broilers , 2003 .

[15]  T. Humphrey,et al.  Impact of Transport Crate Reuse and of Catching and Processing on Campylobacter and Salmonella Contamination of Broiler Chickens , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  X. Kang,et al.  A duplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detecting H5N1 avian influenza virus and pandemic H1N1 influenza virus , 2010, Virology Journal.

[17]  J. Dickens,et al.  Presence and Level of Campylobacter spp. on Broiler Carcasses Throughout the Processing Plant , 2000 .

[18]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance , 2001, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[19]  R. Mulder IMPACT OF TRANSPORT AND RELATED STRESSES ON THE INCIDENCE AND EXTENT OF HUMAN PATHOGENS IN PIGMEAT AND POULTRY , 1995 .