A role for data richness mapping in exploration decision making

Abstract Exploration programs involve long, multi-branched decision pathways with many potential outcomes from a single starting point. Critical decisions along this pathway include the choice of the area(s) in which to explore, and the choice to acquire new data sets to assist in exploration. Included in this is a factoring of risks, including the technical risks associated with imperfect data and the value relative to cost of collecting more data. In our experience it is not common practice to explicitly assess and quantify the impact of data on exploration decisions. A better understanding of the opportunity provided by data has the potential to improve the quality and/or ease of decision making. In this study we explore the potential role of data richness mapping as part of a decision making workflow. We outline a method to quantitatively assess data richness following a four level hierarchy, namely presence of data (L1), quality of data (L2) and attributes of data (L3). Measures of these are combined across several data sets to give an overall estimate of data richness (L4). Using this data richness map, along with past exploration records and a prospectivity model, we conduct an illustrative case study for gold exploration in the Bryah Sub-basin (Yerrida Basin) region of Western Australia. The first application is to produce a simple data based classification of regions with different technical risk characteristics. The second application is to combine this with a prospectivity model to better understand exploration potential. The third application uses data richness mapping to understand which data sets are most likely to have an impact on regional exploration. In each case we show how an understanding of data richness can help support exploration decision making.

[1]  A. Journel Combining Knowledge from Diverse Sources: An Alternative to Traditional Data Independence Hypotheses , 2002 .

[2]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[3]  Whitney Trainor-Guitton,et al.  Global sampling for integrating physics-specific subsystems and quantifying uncertainties of CO2 geological sequestration , 2013 .

[4]  T. McCuaig,et al.  The effect of map scale on geological complexity for computer-aided exploration targeting , 2010 .

[5]  O. Kreuzer,et al.  Linking Mineral Deposit Models to Quantitative Risk Analysis and Decision-Making in Exploration , 2008 .

[6]  Alok Porwal,et al.  Knowledge-Driven and Data-Driven Fuzzy Models for Predictive Mineral Potential Mapping , 2003 .

[7]  T. McCuaig,et al.  Translating the mineral systems approach into an effective exploration targeting system , 2010 .

[8]  V. Rodriguez-Galiano,et al.  Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines , 2015 .

[9]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[10]  A. Porwal,et al.  Exploration targeting for orogenic gold deposits in the Granites-Tanami Orogen: Mineral system analysis, targeting model and prospectivity analysis , 2012 .

[11]  Karol Czarnota,et al.  Predictive mineral discovery in the eastern Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: An example of district scale targeting of an orogenic gold mineral system , 2010 .

[12]  Vijay Singh,et al.  Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources , 1994 .

[13]  Mahyar Yousefi,et al.  Fuzzification of continuous-value spatial evidence for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  A. Porwal,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Mineral prospectivity analysis and quantitative resource estimation , 2010 .

[15]  A practical real option methodology for the evaluation of farm-in/out joint venture agreements in mineral exploration , 2011 .

[16]  Zhizhong Li,et al.  Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework , 2012 .

[17]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Geometric average of spatial evidence data layers: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach to mineral prospectivity mapping , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  V. Lisitsin,et al.  Undiscovered orogenic gold endowment in Northern Victoria, Australia , 2010 .

[19]  Arianne Ford,et al.  Reducing subjectivity in multi-commodity mineral prospectivity analyses: Modelling the west Kimberley, Australia , 2016 .

[20]  P. Hood Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying , 1965 .

[21]  L. Ailleres,et al.  Data fusion and porphyry copper prospectivity models, southeastern Arizona , 2014 .

[22]  K. Peters,et al.  From 2D to 3D: Prospectivity modelling in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand , 2015 .

[23]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[24]  D. Groves,et al.  Science of targeting: definition, strategies, targeting and performance measurement , 2008 .

[25]  H. Haberl,et al.  Challenges for land system science , 2012 .

[27]  C. Knox-Robinson Vectorial fuzzy logic: A novel technique for enhanced mineral prospectivity mapping, with reference to the orogenic gold mineralisation potential of the Kalgoorlie Terrane, Western Australia , 2000 .

[28]  Pietro Guj,et al.  Prospectivity analysis of the Plutonic Marymia Greenstone Belt, Western Australia , 2010 .

[29]  T. McCuaig,et al.  The mineral systems concept: The key to exploration targeting , 2017 .

[30]  P. Guj,et al.  Rank statistical analysis of nickel sulphide resources of the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, Western Australia , 2011 .

[31]  A. Aitken,et al.  Multicommodity mineral systems analysis highlighting mineral prospectivity in the Halls Creek Orogen , 2016 .

[32]  Cheri Speier,et al.  The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Derek McAuley,et al.  The case for “n«all”: Why the Big Data revolution will probably happen differently in the mining sector , 2015 .

[34]  Robert K. Perrons,et al.  Data as an asset: What the oil and gas sector can learn from other industries about “Big Data” , 2015 .

[35]  V. Lisitsin,et al.  Mossman orogenic gold province in north Queensland, Australia: regional metallogenic controls and undiscovered gold endowment , 2014, Mineralium Deposita.

[36]  E. Tulcanaza,et al.  The value of information: a guide to the strategic development of projects founded on mineral resource categorization , 2001 .

[37]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[38]  A. Aitken,et al.  Prospectivity analysis of the Halls Creek orogen, Western Australia: using a mineral systems approach , 2016 .

[39]  O. Yigit Discovered and undiscovered gold endowment of Turkey: a quantitative mineral resource assessment using GIS and rank statistical analysis , 2012, Mineralium Deposita.

[40]  E. Holden,et al.  Semiautomated quantification of the influence of data richness on confidence in the geologic interpretation of aeromagnetic maps , 2013 .

[41]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Presenting Geographic Information: Effects of Data Aggregation, Dispersion, and Users' Spatial Orientation , 1999 .

[42]  Chia-Ying Li,et al.  The more, the better? Why abundant information leads to unanticipated outcomes , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[43]  J. Eidsvik,et al.  The Value of Information in Mineral Exploration Within a Multi-Gaussian Framework , 2013, Mathematical Geosciences.