Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

PurposeNormal progression of osteoporosis or the rigid reinforcement of the fractured vertebral body with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement is being discussed as a cause for adjacent-level fractures after vertebroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether augmentation with low stiffness cement can decrease the risk of adjacent-level fractures in low-quality bone.MethodsEighteen female osteoporotic lumbar specimens (L1–L5) were harvested and divided into three groups according to bone mineral density: (I) native; (II) PMMA; (III) modified PMMA (lower stiffness). For the PMMA and modified PMMA groups, a compression fracture was first mechanically induced in L3, and then the fracture received vertebroplasty treatment. The cement stiffness reduction of the modified PMMA group was achieved via an addition of 8 mL of serum to the typical PMMA base. All specimens were exposed to cyclic loading (4 Hz) and a stepwise increasing applied peak force. Cement stiffness was tested according to ISO 5833.ResultsA 51 % decrease in cement stiffness was achieved in the modified PMMA group (954 ± 141 vs. 1,937 ± 478 MPa, p < 0.001). Fatigue fracture force (the force level during cyclic loading at which the deformation experienced a sudden increase; FFF) was significantly affected by bone quality (r2 = 0.39, p = 0.006) and by the initial fracture force (the force necessary to create the initial fracture in L3 prior to augmentation; r2 = 0.82, p < 0.001). Using initial fracture force as a covariate, the FFF of the modified PMMA group (1,764 ± 49 N) was significantly higher than in the PMMA group (1,544 ± 55 N; p = 0.03).ConclusionsA possible method to reduce adjacent-level fractures after vertebroplasty in patients with reduced bone quality could be the use of a lower modulus cement. Therefore, mixing cement with biocompatible fluids could prove useful to tailor cement properties in the operating theater.

[1]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Bone strength and its determinants , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[2]  M. Rauschmann,et al.  Füllmaterialien zur Augmentation von osteoporotischen Wirbelkörperfrakturen , 2010, Der Orthopäde.

[3]  Joshua A Hirsch,et al.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  Christoph Fankhauser,et al.  Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones – a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[5]  O. Awan,et al.  Biomechanics of vertebral bone augmentation. , 2010, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[6]  B. Boszczyk.  Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two randomised controlled vertebroplasty trials of 2009 , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[7]  Phillip Pollintine,et al.  Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration. , 2007, Bone.

[8]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. , 1987, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  R. Gradinger,et al.  Aktuelle Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose auf der Basis der „European Guidance 2008“ , 2009, Der Orthopäde.

[10]  C. Cooper,et al.  Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  D. Woo,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Blood-Mixed Polymethylmetacrylate in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty , 2009, Asian spine journal.

[12]  T J Sims,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Adult Vertebral Cancellous Bone: Correlation With Collagen Intermolecular Cross‐Links , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  L. Melton,et al.  The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. , 1995, Bone.

[14]  D. Kallmes,et al.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  X Demondion,et al.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: A Systematic Review of 69 Clinical Studies , 2006, Spine.

[17]  E. Schneider,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[18]  M. Rauschmann,et al.  [Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures]. , 2010, Der Orthopade.

[19]  M. Kinoshita,et al.  Adjacent Vertebral Body Fracture Following Vertebroplasty With Polymethylmethacrylate or Calcium Phosphate Cement: Biomechanical Evaluation of the Cadaveric Spine , 2009, Spine.

[20]  納田 真也.  Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement : biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine , 2010 .

[21]  M. Morlock,et al.  High cycle fatigue behaviour of functional spinal units. , 2010, Industrial health.

[22]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  S. Belkoff,et al.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  S. Belkoff,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. , 2000, Spine.

[26]  E. Buskens,et al.  Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Is Not a Risk Factor for New Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: Results from VERTOS II , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.