Tracing the technological development trajectory in post-lithium-ion battery technologies: A patent-based approach

Abstract With the ever-growing energy demands, new battery chemistries beyond lithium ion technology are required to deal with an increased power consumption and promote the vehicle electrification. However, there are still challenges in understanding the cognitive structure of evolving R&D processes. The study of the patent landscape can provide a complementary perspective on the trajectories of technological change and facilitate interdisciplinary discussions that help make future technology planning more rationally. In this study, we investigate the technological development trajectory of post-lithium-ion battery technologies based on the analysis of patent data. A data-driven approach, which comprises of patent co-classification analysis, application of link prediction algorithm and text mining technique, is used to highlight the recent research progress on selected post-lithium-ion battery technologies. These are lithium air, lithium sulfur and sodium-ion batteries. A lithium air battery is composed of a lithium metal anode, a porous carbon cathode with high catalytic activities towards electrochemical oxygen reactions, and either an aqueous or non-aqueous electrolyte. Similarly, a lithium sulfur battery consists of a lithium metal anode, a sulfur composite cathode, and an organic electrolyte. Sodium-ion batteries share the same architecture as the lithium ion-batteries, but are normally based on carbonaceous anode materials, layered transition metal oxides cathode demonstrating a minimal structural change upon intercalation, and aqueous electrolytes. The results indicate that the number of patents related to post-lithium-ion battery technologies has noticeably increased since 2008. A few East Asian countries and USA dominate the underlying patent landscape. The co-classification analysis showed that not only the amount of interacting knowledge areas but also the cross-linking with adjacent technological knowledge areas has increased. Moreover, the knowledge areas related to the electric vehicles and polymer applications are predicted to gain more relevance in the future. According to the text mining results, the most common application areas comprise vehicles, devices, energy storage, computers and phones. The main innovations of this study are as follows: First, it identified the current research trends and prospects for the post-lithium-ion battery technologies based on the insights gained from objective data, assisting R&D planners in determining their further directions for research and development. The exploration of the technological development trajectory of post-lithium-ion battery could serve as a reference for relevant researchers to better understand the dynamics and make strategic adjustments, which have profound significance for the progress of clean energy and green chemistry development. Second, it discovered the dynamics of interacting knowledge areas, which indicate an increased tendency of technology convergence. In case of lithium air and lithium sulfur batteries, notable interactions between knowledge areas pertaining to the core battery components (cell configurations and electrolytes) and application-driven knowledge fields (electric vehicles and phones) were observed. The intensity of these interactions was rather weak in case of sodium-ion battery technology. Accordingly, researchers need to seek for new knowledge outside of their traditional knowledge boundaries to accelerate the commercial breakthrough of post-lithium-ion batteries. In particular, knowledge areas related to electrical vehicles have gained in importance in all of the examined battery technologies, reflecting the drive to produce high-energy battery systems. Third, it predicted the knowledge areas that could gain more relevance in the future research by comparing the predictive power of different machine learning algorithms. This forward-looking approach can add a new empirical perspective to the discussion of sustainable technology development. Fourth, in contrast to common assumption, it showed that SIBs could also power up portable applications like mobile devices or electric vehicles.

[1]  Lauren E. Marbella,et al.  Sodiation and Desodiation via Helical Phosphorus Intermediates in High-Capacity Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  China's traction battery technology roadmap: Targets, impacts and concerns , 2017 .

[3]  Xueliang Sun,et al.  Structural Design of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Fundamental Research to Practical Application , 2018, Electrochemical Energy Reviews.

[4]  Martin Winter,et al.  Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density , 2017, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry.

[5]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Patent citation network analysis for the domain of organic photovoltaic cells: Country, institution, and technology field , 2013 .

[6]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Structural properties and inter-organizational knowledge flows of patent citation network: The case of organic solar cells , 2016 .

[7]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities , 2016 .

[8]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  How much electrical energy storage do we need? A synthesis for the U.S., Europe, and Germany , 2018 .

[9]  Jian Shu,et al.  Link Prediction Approach for Opportunistic Networks Based on Recurrent Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Access.

[10]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents , 2015 .

[11]  Linyuan Lü,et al.  Similarity index based on local paths for link prediction of complex networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identification and evaluation of corporations for merger and acquisition strategies using patent information and text mining , 2013, Scientometrics.

[13]  Xueliang Huang,et al.  Plug-in electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment of China towards 2020: Policies, methodologies, and challenges , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[14]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  A “technology-smart” battery policy strategy for Europe , 2018, Science.

[15]  Alexander M. Bradshaw,et al.  Supply risks associated with lithium-ion battery materials , 2018 .

[16]  Geert Asche,et al.  “80% of technical information found only in patents” – Is there proof of this [1]? , 2017 .

[17]  Yves Dube,et al.  A comprehensive review of lithium-ion batteries used in hybrid and electric vehicles at cold temperatures , 2016 .

[18]  Khalil Amine,et al.  Perspectives of automotive battery R&D in China, Germany, Japan, and the USA , 2018 .

[19]  Yan Yu,et al.  Toward True Lithium-Air Batteries , 2018 .

[20]  Stephen Hall,et al.  Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions , 2018, Applied Energy.

[21]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Using Essential Patent Index and Essential Technological Strength to evaluate industrial technological innovation competitiveness , 2007, Scientometrics.

[22]  Federico Caviggioli,et al.  Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data , 2016 .

[23]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries , 2017 .

[24]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind energy and green economy in Europe: Measuring policy-induced innovation using patent data , 2016 .

[25]  Wei Chen,et al.  Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery , 2018 .

[26]  A. B. Gallo,et al.  Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review , 2016 .

[27]  Jun Li,et al.  A link prediction approach for item recommendation with complex number , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  S. Passerini,et al.  A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries , 2018 .

[29]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[30]  Yang Xia,et al.  Revisiting Scientific Issues for Industrial Applications of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries , 2018, Energy & Environmental Materials.

[31]  Jens Leker,et al.  Current research trends and prospects among the various materials and designs used in lithium-based batteries , 2013, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry.

[32]  Yang Zheng,et al.  Recent progress on sodium ion batteries: potential high-performance anodes , 2018 .

[33]  Stefano Longo,et al.  A review on electric vehicle battery modelling: From Lithium-ion toward Lithium–Sulphur , 2016 .

[34]  G. Blomgren The development and future of lithium ion batteries , 2017 .

[35]  L. Nazar,et al.  A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. , 2009, Nature materials.

[36]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Evaluating link prediction methods , 2014, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[37]  Gerhard Schewe,et al.  Paving the Road to Electric Vehicles – A Patent Analysis of the Automotive Supply Industry , 2017 .

[38]  Jiawei Wang,et al.  An Ultralong Lifespan and Low‐Temperature Workable Sodium‐Ion Full Battery for Stationary Energy Storage , 2018 .

[39]  Lip Huat Saw,et al.  Integration issues of lithium-ion battery into electric vehicles battery pack , 2016 .

[40]  Linda F Nazar,et al.  The emerging chemistry of sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[41]  Boucar Diouf,et al.  Potential of lithium-ion batteries in renewable energy , 2015 .

[42]  Jens Leker,et al.  Anticipation of converging technology areas — A refined approach for the identification of attractive fields of innovation , 2017 .

[43]  Liquan Chen,et al.  Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage , 2013 .

[44]  Alireza Khaligh,et al.  Battery, Ultracapacitor, Fuel Cell, and Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Electric, Hybrid Electric, Fuel Cell, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[45]  Rupert J. Baumgartner,et al.  Identifying dominant topics appearing in the Journal of Cleaner Production , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  Jihong Wang,et al.  Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation , 2015 .

[47]  G. Benveniste,et al.  Comparison of the state of Lithium-Sulphur and lithium-ion batteries applied to electromobility. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Key issues of lithium-ion batteries – from resource depletion to environmental performance indicators , 2015 .

[49]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .

[50]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[51]  E. Marder Foundations for the future. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Masaki Maeda,et al.  Nanotube-structured Na2V3O7 as a Cathode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries with High-rate and Stable Cycle Performances , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[53]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[54]  Xuan Hu,et al.  A lithium–oxygen battery with a long cycle life in an air-like atmosphere , 2018, Nature.

[55]  Peng Wang,et al.  Link prediction in social networks: the state-of-the-art , 2014, Science China Information Sciences.

[56]  Nathalie Sick,et al.  Identifying trends in battery technologies with regard to electric mobility: evidence from patenting activities along and across the battery value chain , 2015 .

[57]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .

[58]  Michael F. Doherty,et al.  Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions , 2018 .

[59]  Chie Hoon Song,et al.  Analysis of technological knowledge stock and prediction of its future development potential: The case of lithium-ion batteries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[60]  Linda F. Nazar,et al.  Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes , 2016, Nature Energy.

[61]  C. Delmas,et al.  Sodium and Sodium‐Ion Batteries: 50 Years of Research , 2018 .

[62]  Xiangwu Zhang,et al.  Recent progress in polymer materials for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries , 2019, Progress in Polymer Science.

[63]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles – the case study of Greece , 2013 .

[64]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Keyword extraction from a single document using word co-occurrence statistical information , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[65]  Hayoung Choi,et al.  Innovation Topic Analysis of Technology: The Case of Augmented Reality Patents , 2018, IEEE Access.

[66]  Oh-Jin Kwon,et al.  Product opportunity identification based on internal capabilities using text mining and association rule mining , 2016 .

[67]  Bin Liu,et al.  Advancing Lithium Metal Batteries , 2018 .

[68]  Prasant Kumar Nayak,et al.  From Lithium-Ion to Sodium-Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[69]  Antti Uusitalo,et al.  Technology competition in the internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: a patent landscape analysis , 2016 .

[70]  Chie Hoon Song,et al.  Competition or collaboration? – Analysis of technological knowledge ecosystem within the field of alternative powertrain systems: A patent-based approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[71]  Yong Li,et al.  Efficient storage mechanisms and heterogeneous structures for building better next-generation lithium rechargeable batteries , 2017 .

[72]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[73]  M. Cellura,et al.  Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2019, Journal of cleaner production.

[74]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[75]  Bo Liu,et al.  Lithium and lithium ion batteries for applications in microelectronic devices: A review , 2015 .

[76]  Janghyeok Yoon,et al.  Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: the case of Korean national R&D , 2013, Scientometrics.

[77]  Haegyeom Kim,et al.  Reaction chemistry in rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. , 2017, Chemical Society reviews.

[78]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[79]  A. Hollenkamp,et al.  Emerging electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies , 2014, Front. Chem..

[80]  Bin Chen,et al.  Flexible Zn– and Li–air batteries: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives , 2017 .

[81]  Gerbrand Ceder,et al.  Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium‐Ion Batteries , 2012 .

[82]  Wolfgang Haselrieder,et al.  Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies , 2018 .

[83]  Shinichi Komaba,et al.  P2-type Na(x)[Fe(1/2)Mn(1/2)]O2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries. , 2012, Nature materials.

[84]  R. Tijssen A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research☆ , 1992 .

[85]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review , 2011 .

[86]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  An Outlook on Lithium Ion Battery Technology , 2017, ACS central science.

[87]  Colm O'Dwyer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lithium-air battery cells , 2016 .

[88]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  Hybrid and Aqueous Lithium‐Air Batteries , 2015 .

[89]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Monitoring Innovation in Electrochemical Energy Storage Technologies: A Patent-based Approach , 2014 .

[90]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations , 2017 .

[91]  Shengbo Zhang,et al.  Oxygen reduction reaction catalyst on lithium/air battery discharge performance , 2011 .

[92]  Jun Lu,et al.  State-of-the-art characterization techniques for advanced lithium-ion batteries , 2017, Nature Energy.

[93]  Moran Balaish,et al.  A critical review on lithium-air battery electrolytes. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.