Spatial release from masking of aerial tones in pinnipeds.

In most masking experiments, target signals and sound intended to mask are located in the same position. Spatial release from masking (SRM) occurs when signals and maskers are spatially separated, resulting in detection improvement relative to when they are spatially co-located. In this study, SRM was investigated in a harbor seal, who naturally lacks pinnae, and California sea lion, who possesses reduced pinnae. Subjects had to detect aerial tones at 1, 8, and 16 kHz in the presence of octave bands of white noise centered at the tone frequency. While the masker occurred in front of the subject (0 degree), the tone occurred at 0, 45, or 90 degrees in the horizontal plane. Unmasked thresholds were also measured at these angles to determine sensitivity differences based on source azimuth. Compared to when signal and masker where co-located, masked thresholds were lower by as much as 19 and 12 dB in the harbor seal and sea lion, respectively, when signal and masker were separated. Masked threshold differences of the harbor seal were larger than those previously measured under water. Performance was consistent with some measurements collected on terrestrial animals but differences between subjects at the highest frequency likely reflect variations in pinna anatomy.

[1]  Bruce H. Deatherage,et al.  Masking and Interaural Phase. II. 167 Cycles , 1962 .

[2]  N. Durlach,et al.  TIME-INTENSITY RELATIONS IN BINAURAL UNMASKING. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  W. Au,et al.  Receiving beam patterns and directivity indices of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking , 2005 .

[6]  D R Moore,et al.  Free-field binaural unmasking in ferrets. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B. L. Boeuf,et al.  Female competition and reproductive success in northern elephant seals , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Spatial unmasking of nearby pure-tone targets in a simulated anechoic environment. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[11]  R. Schusterman,et al.  Auditory masking in three pinnipeds: aerial critical ratios and direct critical bandwidth measurements. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  William C. Stebbins,et al.  Principles of Animal Psychophysics , 1970 .

[13]  Interaural Time and Intensity Difference and the MLD , 1965 .

[14]  S. D. Turnbull,et al.  White noise and pure tone masking of pure tone thresholds of a harbour seal listening in air and underwater , 1990 .

[15]  The effect of interaural signal-frequency disparity on signal detectability. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. D. Turnbull Changes in masked thresholds of a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) associated with angular separation of signal and noise sources , 1994 .

[17]  K. Saberi,et al.  Free-field release from masking. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Localization of aerial pure tones by pinnipeds. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Ison,et al.  The effect of spatial separation of signal and noise on masking in the free field as a function of signal frequency and age in the mouse. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Schusterman,et al.  Acoustic communication ranges for northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris ) , 2003 .

[21]  W. Au,et al.  Underwater localization of pulsed pure tones by the California sea lion(Zalophus californianus). , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  S. D. Wn•x ON MINIMUM AUDIBLE SOUND FIELDS* , 2004 .

[23]  Michael D. Good,et al.  Effects of Frequency on Free-Field Masking , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[24]  R. Schusterman,et al.  Masking in three pinnipeds: underwater, low-frequency critical ratios. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J M Terhune,et al.  Directional hearing of a harbor seal in air and water. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  J. Terhune,et al.  Masked hearing thresholds of ringed seals. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S. D. Turnbull,et al.  Masked threshold changes associated with angular separation of noise and signal sources. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[28]  David E. Bain,et al.  Effects of Masking Noise on Detection Thresholds of Killer Whales , 1994 .

[29]  S. D. White,et al.  ON MINIMUM AUDIBLE SOUND FIELDS , 1933 .

[30]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Localization of aerial broadband noise by pinnipeds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Auditory target detection in reverberation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J. Lewis,et al.  Probit Analysis (3rd ed). , 1972 .

[33]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .