Blaming the Victim: The Effects of Extraversion and Information Disclosure on Guilt Attributions in Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying victims' success in coping with bullying largely depends on schoolmates and other bystanders' social support. However, factors influencing the degree of social support have as yet not been investigated. In this article, the concept of victim blaming is applied to cyberbullying incidents. It is assumed that a cyberbullying victim receives less social support when the victim's behavior is perceived as very overt. It is further assumed that this effect's underlying process is the partial attribution of responsibility for the incident to the victim and not to the bully. The hypotheses are tested with a 2×2 online experiment. In this experiment, varying online self-presentations of a fictitious female cyberbullying victim were presented to 586 Germans aged 16-22. The victim's public Facebook profile was manipulated in terms of the victim's extraversion and the amount of personal information disclosed. The results support the hypotheses. Participants attributed more responsibility for the bullying incident to the victim when the victim was presented as extraverted and very open in revealing personal information. This diminished social support for the victim. The effect was partially mediated by the victim's perceived attractiveness. The study implies that concepts from victimization research can enhance our understanding of cyberbullying incidents. Among other factors, the victim's specific personal characteristics deserve more consideration--not only with regard to the incident itself but also regarding subsequent social dynamics and coping mechanisms.

[1]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Jing Wang,et al.  Co-occurrence of victimization from five subtypes of bullying: physical, verbal, social exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. , 2010, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[3]  Peter K. Smith The nature of school bullying : a cross-national perspective , 1999 .

[4]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Defensive attribution-Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident , 1970 .

[6]  Seounmi Youn Teenagers' Perceptions of Online Privacy and Coping Behaviors: A Risk–Benefit Appraisal Approach , 2005 .

[7]  K. Rigby Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. , 2000, Journal of adolescence.

[8]  James R. Scroggs Penalties for Rape as a Function of Victim Provocativeness, Damage, and Resistance , 1976 .

[9]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[10]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[11]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide , 2010, Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research.

[12]  C. L. Mulford,et al.  General Versus Specific Victim Blaming , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[13]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard , 2006 .

[14]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Offline Consequences of Online Victimization , 2007 .

[15]  Tolga Aricak,et al.  Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Francine Dehue,et al.  Cyberbullying: Youngsters' Experiences and Parental Perception , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[18]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade , 2003 .

[19]  J. Hunter,et al.  Child provocativeness and gender as factors contributing to the blaming of victims of physical child abuse. , 1993, Child abuse & neglect.

[20]  Qing Li,et al.  New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  H. Kury Wie werden Opfer von Straftaten gesehen , 2003 .

[22]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Are sociable people more beautiful? A zero-acquaintance analysis of agreeableness, extraversion, and attractiveness , 2010 .

[23]  Qing Li Cyberbullying in High Schools: A Study of Students' Behaviors and Beliefs about This New Phenomenon , 2010 .

[24]  Amy E. Grubb,et al.  Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim , 2009 .

[25]  J. Burger Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. , 1981 .

[26]  S. Desmarais,et al.  Risky Disclosures on Facebook , 2012 .

[27]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Extending the school grounds?--Bullying experiences in cyberspace. , 2008, The Journal of school health.

[28]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[29]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[30]  Julia Riebel,et al.  Cyberbullying in Germany - an exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies , 2009 .

[31]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[32]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[33]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. , 1990 .

[34]  Mark A. Whatley Victim characteristics influencing attributions of responsibility to rape victims: A meta-analysis , 1996 .

[35]  Charlene Cook,et al.  Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. , 2010, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[36]  B. Thornton,et al.  The Influence of a Rape Victim's Physical Attractiveness on Observers' Attributions of Responsibility , 1983 .

[37]  R. Bull,et al.  Comparing Rape Victim and Perpetrator Blaming in a Police Officer Sample , 2012 .

[38]  Kees van den Bos,et al.  On the Psychology of the Belief in a Just World: Exploring Experiential and Rationalistic Paths to Victim Blaming , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  Matthew T. King,et al.  Adolescent risk correlates of bullying and different types of victimization , 2006, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[40]  E. Walster,et al.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..