Positive visualization of implanted devices with susceptibility gradient mapping using the original resolution

In magnetic resonance imaging, implantable devices are usually visualized with a negative contrast. Recently, positive contrast techniques have been proposed, such as susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM). However, SGM reduces the spatial resolution making positive visualization of small structures difficult. Here, a development of SGM using the original resolution (SUMO) is presented. For this, a filter is applied in k‐space and the signal amplitude is analyzed in the image domain to determine quantitatively the susceptibility gradient for each pixel. It is shown in simulations and experiments that SUMO results in a better visualization of small structures in comparison to SGM. SUMO is applied to patient datasets for visualization of stent and prostate brachytherapy seeds. In addition, SUMO also provides quantitative information about the number of prostate brachytherapy seeds. The method might be extended to application for visualization of other interventional devices, and, like SGM, it might also be used to visualize magnetically labelled cells. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J J Prete,et al.  Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset , 2009, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[3]  M. Viergever,et al.  Suitability of 7 Aortic Stent-Graft Models for MRI-Based Surveillance , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[4]  Peter Blum,et al.  Physical properties handbook: a guide to the shipboard measurement of physical properties of deep-sea cores , 1997 .

[5]  S Nag,et al.  The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Wei Liu,et al.  Susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM): A new postprocessing method for positive contrast generation applied to superparamagnetic iron oxide particle (SPIO)‐labeled cells , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  A system for real-time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Kate McLeish,et al.  Comparison of combined x-ray radiography and magnetic resonance (XMR) imaging-versus computed tomography-based dosimetry for the evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Max A Viergever,et al.  Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: The white marker phenomenon , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation of Current Thoracic Aortic Stent-Grafts for Real-Time MR-Guided Placement , 2006, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[12]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Positive contrast visualization of nitinol devices using susceptibility gradient mapping , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide‐labeled stem cells using inversion‐recovery with ON‐resonant water suppression (IRON) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  H. Weiss,et al.  Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla , 1996, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[16]  E. Fishman,et al.  Thoracic aortic stent-grafts: utility of multidetector CT for pre- and postprocedure evaluation. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Koichi Oshio,et al.  Application of k-space energy spectrum analysis to susceptibility field mapping and distortion correction in gradient-echo EPI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[19]  P. Batchelor,et al.  International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 1997 .

[20]  K. Vincken,et al.  White‐marker imaging—Separating magnetic susceptibility effects from partial volume effects , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.