WILL COMET ISON (C/2012 S1) SURVIVE PERIHELION?

On 2013 November 28 Comet ISON (C/2012 S1) will pass by the Sun with a perihelion distance of 2.7 solar radii. Understanding the possible outcomes for the comet's response to such a close passage by the Sun is important for planning observational campaigns and for inferring ISON's physical properties. We present new numerical simulations and interpret them in context with the historical track record of comet disruptions and of sungrazing comet behavior. Historical data suggest that sizes below ~200?m are susceptible to destruction by sublimation driven mass loss, while we find that for ISON's perihelion distance, densities lower than 0.1?g?cm?3 are required to tidally disrupt a retrograde or non-spinning body. Such low densities are substantially below the range of the best-determined comet nucleus densities, though dynamically new comets such as ISON have few measurements of physical properties. Disruption may occur for prograde rotation at densities up to 0.7?g?cm?3, with the chances of disruption increasing for lower density, faster prograde rotation, and increasing elongation of the nucleus. Given current constraints on ISON's nucleus properties and the typically determined values for these properties among all comets, we find tidal disruption to be unlikely unless other factors (e.g., spin-up via torquing) affect ISON substantially. Whether or not disruption occurs, the largest remnant must be big enough to survive subsequent mass loss due to sublimation in order for ISON to remain a viable comet well after perihelion.

[1]  M. A’Hearn Comets as Building Blocks , 2011 .

[2]  Brian Carcich,et al.  A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1's gravity, mass, and density , 2007 .

[3]  George Lake,et al.  Direct Large-Scale N-Body Simulations of Planetesimal Dynamics , 2000 .

[4]  K. Holsapple,et al.  Tidal disruptions: II. A continuum theory for solid bodies with strength, with applications to the Solar System , 2008 .

[5]  E. J. Oepik Sun-grazing comets and tidal disruption. , 1966 .

[6]  S. Tremaine,et al.  Tidal disruption of viscous bodies , 1992 .

[7]  Paul W. Chodas,et al.  Fragmentation Hierarchy of Bright Sungrazing Comets and the Birth and Orbital Evolution of the Kreutz System. II. The Case for Cascading Fragmentation , 2007 .

[8]  Paul W. Chodas,et al.  COMET C/2011 W3 (LOVEJOY): ORBIT DETERMINATION, OUTBURSTS, DISINTEGRATION OF NUCLEUS, DUST-TAIL MORPHOLOGY, AND RELATIONSHIP TO NEW CLUSTER OF BRIGHT SUNGRAZERS , 2012, 1205.5839.

[9]  D. A. Biesecker,et al.  Sungrazing Comets Discovered with the SOHO/LASCO Coronagraphs 1996–1998 , 1999 .

[10]  P. Bochsler,et al.  Sungrazing comets: Properties of nuclei and in-situ detectability of cometary ions at 1 AU , 2002 .

[11]  Antoine Llebaria,et al.  PHOTOMETRIC STUDY OF THE KREUTZ COMETS OBSERVED BY SOHO FROM 1996 TO 2005 , 2010 .

[12]  Willy Benz,et al.  Tidal disruption of inviscid planetesimals , 1991 .

[13]  B. G. Marsden,et al.  The sungrazing comet group. II , 1989 .

[14]  Pascal Saint-Hilaire,et al.  Probing the Solar Magnetic Field with a Sun-Grazing Comet , 2013, Science.

[15]  Zdenek Sekanina,et al.  Runaway Fragmentation of Sungrazing Comets Observed with the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory , 2002 .

[16]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE DISRUPTION OF COMET D/1993 F2 SHOEMAKER–LEVY 9 REPRESENTING THE PROGENITOR BY A GRAVITATIONALLY BOUND ASSEMBLAGE OF RANDOMLY SHAPED POLYHEDRA , 2012, 1207.3386.

[17]  Nalin Samarasinha,et al.  RELATING CHANGES IN COMETARY ROTATION TO ACTIVITY: CURRENT STATUS AND APPLICATIONS TO COMET C/2012 S1 (ISON) , 2013 .

[18]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Structure of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Inferred from the Physics of Tidal Breakup , 1996 .

[19]  G. Kronk,et al.  Cometography: Volume 5, 1960-1982: A Catalog of Comets , 2010 .

[20]  G. Kronk,et al.  Cometography: A Catalog of Comets , 2008 .

[21]  Paul Bryans,et al.  THE EXTREME-ULTRAVIOLET EMISSION FROM SUN-GRAZING COMETS , 2012, 1209.5708.

[22]  Silvano Fineschi,et al.  Solar Wind at 6.8 Solar Radii from UVCS Observation of Comet C/1996Y1 , 1998 .

[23]  P. Weissman,et al.  Structure and density of cometary nuclei , 2008 .

[24]  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar,et al.  Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium , 1969 .

[25]  O. C. St. Cyr,et al.  Sungrazing comets observed by the solar maximum mission coronagraph , 1991 .

[26]  S. Stern ISM-induced erosion and gas-dynamical drag in the Oort Cloud , 1990 .

[27]  Z. Sekanina Erosion Model for the Sungrazing Comets Observed with the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory , 2003 .

[28]  B. G. Marsden,et al.  The sungrazing comet group , 1967 .

[29]  D. Richardson,et al.  Binary near-Earth asteroid formation: Rubble pile model of tidal disruptions , 2005 .

[30]  H. U. Keller,et al.  A note on the survival of the sungrazing comet C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy) within the Roche limit , 2012, 1203.1808.

[31]  S. Love,et al.  Tidal Distortion and Disruption of Earth-Crossing Asteroids , 1997 .

[32]  J C Brown,et al.  Destruction of Sun-Grazing Comet C/2011 N3 (SOHO) Within the Low Solar Corona , 2012, Science.