Probabilistic exact deletion and probabilistic no-signalling

In this study, we show that one cannot use non-local resources for probabilistic signalling even if one can delete a quantum state with the help of a probabilistic quantum deletion machine (PQDM). Here, we find that PQDM is not going to help us in identifying two statistical mixtures at a remote location. Also we derive the bound on deletion probability from a no-signalling condition.

[1]  G. Guo,et al.  Probabilistic Cloning and Identification of Linearly Independent Quantum States , 1998, quant-ph/9804064.

[2]  M. Redhead.  Incompleteness, nonlocality, and realism , 1987 .

[3]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process , 1980 .

[4]  P. H. Eberhard,et al.  Bell’s theorem and the different concepts of locality , 1978 .

[5]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[6]  Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling , 1999, quant-ph/9908017.

[7]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state , 2000, Nature.

[8]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum deleting and Signalling , 2003 .

[9]  Nicolas Gisin.  Quantum cloning without signaling , 1998 .

[10]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[11]  Buzek,et al.  Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Quantum information cannot be split into complementary parts , 2005, quant-ph/0503168.

[13]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  No signalling and probabilistic quantum cloning , 1999 .

[14]  Daowen Qiu.  Non-optimal universal quantum deleting machine , 2002 .

[15]  Nick Herbert.  FLASH—A superluminal communicator based upon a new kind of quantum measurement , 1982 .

[16]  Horace P. Yuen,et al.  Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers , 1986 .