Hysteresis modeling with frequency-separation-based Gaussian process and its application to sinusoidal scanning for fast imaging of atomic force microscope

Abstract Rate-dependent hysteresis of the piezoelectric tube scanner (PTS) used in the atomic force microscope (AFM) deteriorates the tracking performance of the PTS and thus causes image distortion of the AFM, especially in high-speed operations. Additionally, the traditional raster pattern scanning technique also limits fast imaging of the AFM. In this work, the frequency-separation-based Gaussian Process (FSGP) is proposed to model the hysteresis of the PTS for sinusoidal scanning. In order to properly describe the rate-dependency of the hysteresis, the training dataset of the model is obtained by exciting the PTS using a sinusoidal chirp signal. So, it contains a large number of datapoints which brings a heavy computational burden. Different from the conventional Gaussian Process (GP) which utilizes the whole training dataset at test-stage, the FSGP separates the training dataset according to the target frequency of the testing reference. Only the optimal subset of the training dataset is selected for making predictions. By this way, the computational efficiency as well as the model accuracy are improved significantly. Without the inversion calculation, an inverse hysteresis compensator (IHC) is directly constructed by using the FSGP. Based on the IHC, open-loop and closed-loop controllers are designed and tested. Experiments are carried out on a commercial AFM. The tracking and imaging results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the FSGP-based modeling and compensation method.

[1]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Hysteresis modeling and displacement control of piezoelectric actuators with the frequency-dependent behavior using a generalized Bouc–Wen model , 2016 .

[2]  Chih-Jer Lin,et al.  Tracking control of a biaxial piezo-actuated positioning stage using generalized Duhem model , 2012, Comput. Math. Appl..

[3]  Yongchun Fang,et al.  A high-efficiency Kalman filtering imaging mode for an atomic force microscopy with hysteresis modeling and compensation , 2018 .

[4]  Youguang Guo,et al.  A Hybrid Feedforward-Feedback Hysteresis Compensator in Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Least-Squares Support Vector Machine , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  Yangmin Li,et al.  Modeling and High Dynamic Compensating the Rate-Dependent Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators via a Novel Modified Inverse Preisach Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  Guoqiang Chen,et al.  Identification of piezoelectric hysteresis by a novel Duhem model based neural network , 2017 .

[7]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Rate-dependent hysteresis modeling and compensation of piezoelectric actuators using Gaussian process , 2019, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical.

[8]  Micky Rakotondrabe Classical Prandtl-Ishlinskii modeling and inverse multiplicative structure to compensate hysteresis in piezoactuators , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[9]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Precision Motion Control of Piezoelectric Nanopositioning Stage With Chattering-Free Adaptive Sliding Mode Control , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[10]  D. Jiles,et al.  Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis , 1986 .

[11]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  A new approach to hysteresis modelling for a piezoelectric actuator using Preisach model and recursive method with an application to open-loop position tracking control , 2018 .

[12]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Identification and Compensation of Piezoelectric Hysteresis Without Modeling Hysteresis Inverse , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Robert B. Gramacy,et al.  Ja n 20 08 Bayesian Treed Gaussian Process Models with an Application to Computer Modeling , 2009 .

[14]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Rate-Dependent Hysteresis Modeling and Control of a Piezostage Using Online Support Vector Machine and Relevance Vector Machine , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  Feedback/feedforward control of hysteresis-compensated piezoelectric actuators for high-speed scanning applications , 2015 .

[16]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  A Survey of Methods Used to Control Piezoelectric Tube Scanners in High‐Speed AFM Imaging , 2018 .

[17]  A. Fleming,et al.  Evaluation of charge drives for scanning probe microscope positioning stages , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[18]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Hysteresis modeling and compensation of a piezostage using least squares support vector machines , 2011 .

[19]  I. A. Mahmood,et al.  Fast spiral-scan atomic force microscopy , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[20]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Improvement in the Imaging Performance of Atomic Force Microscopy: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[21]  R. Ben Mrad,et al.  A model for voltage-to-displacement dynamics in piezoceramic actuators subject to dynamic-voltage excitations , 2002 .

[22]  Peiyue Li,et al.  Adaptive Fuzzy Hysteresis Internal Model Tracking Control of Piezoelectric Actuators With Nanoscale Application , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  U-Xuan Tan,et al.  Modeling Piezoelectric Actuator Hysteresis with Singularity Free Prandtl-Ishlinskii Model , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[24]  A. Bazaei,et al.  Combining Spiral Scanning and Internal Model Control for Sequential AFM Imaging at Video Rate , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Bo Song,et al.  Asymmetric Hysteresis Modeling and Compensation Approach for Nanomanipulation System Motion Control Considering Working-Range Effect , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[26]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Advanced Control of Piezoelectric Micro-/Nano-Positioning Systems , 2015 .

[27]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Non-linear compensation and displacement control of the bias-rate-dependent hysteresis of a magnetostrictive actuator , 2017 .

[28]  Dawei Zhang,et al.  Design issues in a decoupled XY stage: Static and dynamics modeling, hysteresis compensation, and tracking control , 2013 .

[29]  H. Xiaodong,et al.  Effect of Surfactants in Aqueous Solutions on Oil-Resisting Performance of Membrane Surfaces with Charges by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2018 .

[30]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and compensating the dynamic hysteresis of piezoelectric actuators via a modified rate-dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model , 2015 .

[31]  Liang Deng,et al.  Modified Elman neural network based neural adaptive inverse control of rate-dependent hysteresis , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[32]  M. Al Janaideh,et al.  Inverse Rate-Dependent Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model for Feedforward Compensation of Hysteresis in a Piezomicropositioning Actuator , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.