ROBOTIC LASER ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING OF 715 KEPLER EXOPLANET CANDIDATES USING ROBO-AO

The Robo-AO Kepler Planetary Candidate Survey is observing every Kepler planet candidate host star with laser adaptive optics imaging to search for blended nearby stars, which may be physically associated companions and/or responsible for transit false positives. In this paper, we present the results from the 2012 observing season, searching for stars close to 715 Kepler planet candidate hosts. We find 53 companions, 43 of which are new discoveries. We detail the Robo-AO survey data reduction methods including a method of using the large ensemble of target observations as mutual point-spread-function references, along with a new automated companion-detection algorithm designed for large adaptive optics surveys. Our survey is sensitive to objects from ≈0."15 to 2."5 separation, with magnitude differences up to Δm ≈ 6. We measure an overall nearby-star probability for Kepler planet candidates of 7.4% ± 1.0%, and calculate the effects of each detected nearby star on the Kepler-measured planetary radius. We discuss several Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) of particular interest, including KOI-191 and KOI-1151, which are both multi-planet systems with detected stellar companions whose unusual planetary system architecture might be best explained if they are "coincident multiple" systems, with several transiting planets shared between the two stars. Finally, we find 98% confidence evidence that short-period giant planets are two to three times more likely than longer-period planets to be found in wide stellar binaries.

[1]  K. Batygin A primordial origin for misalignments between stellar spin axes and planetary orbits , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Adam L. Kraus,et al.  MILLIONS OF MULTIPLES: DETECTING AND CHARACTERIZING CLOSE-SEPARATION BINARY SYSTEMS IN SYNOPTIC SKY SURVEYS , 2012, 1210.4550.

[3]  Marco Bonati,et al.  The Automated Palomar 60 Inch Telescope , 2006, astro-ph/0608323.

[4]  T. Morton AN EFFICIENT AUTOMATED VALIDATION PROCEDURE FOR EXOPLANET TRANSIT CANDIDATES , 2012, 1206.1568.

[5]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[6]  A. Santerne,et al.  The contribution of secondary eclipses as astrophysical false positives to exoplanet transit surveys , 2013, 1307.2003.

[7]  S. Tremaine,et al.  Submitted to ApJ Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 SHRINKING BINARY AND PLANETARY ORBITS BY KOZAI CYCLES WITH TIDAL FRICTION , 2022 .

[8]  Peter Tenenbaum,et al.  Identification of Background False Positives from Kepler Data , 2013, 1303.0052.

[9]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  LHS 6343 C: A TRANSITING FIELD BROWN DWARF DISCOVERED BY THE KEPLER MISSION , 2010, 1008.4141.

[10]  S. T. Hodgkin,et al.  Discovery of five very low mass close binaries, resolved in the visible with lucky imaging * , 2006 .

[11]  Eric B. Ford,et al.  Constraining the false positive rate for Kepler planet candidates with multicolour photometry from the GTC , 2012, 1207.2481.

[12]  Steve B. Howell,et al.  OBSERVATIONS OF BINARY STARS WITH THE DIFFERENTIAL SPECKLE SURVEY INSTRUMENT. IV. OBSERVATIONS OF KEPLER, CoRoT, AND HIPPARCOS STARS FROM THE GEMINI NORTH TELESCOPE , 2012 .

[13]  David R. Ciardi,et al.  ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGES OF KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST , 2012, 1205.5535.

[14]  Etienne Artigau,et al.  A New Algorithm for Point-Spread Function Subtraction in High-Contrast Imaging: A Demonstration with Angular Differential Imaging , 2007, astro-ph/0702697.

[15]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[16]  Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA , 2012, 1202.5852.

[17]  John Asher Johnson,et al.  ON THE LOW FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES , 2011, 1101.5630.

[18]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results , 2010, Science.

[19]  D. Charbonneau,et al.  THE OCCURRENCE RATE OF SMALL PLANETS AROUND SMALL STARS , 2013, 1302.1647.

[20]  Christoph Baranec,et al.  The Robo-AO software: fully autonomous operation of a laser guide star adaptive optics and science system , 2012, Other Conferences.

[21]  M. R. Haas,et al.  Kepler Mission Design, Realized Photometric Performance, and Early Science , 2010, 1001.0268.

[22]  Timothy M. Brown,et al.  KEPLER INPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION , 2011, 1102.0342.

[23]  M. R. Haas,et al.  MASSES, RADII, AND ORBITS OF SMALL KEPLER PLANETS: THE TRANSITION FROM GASEOUS TO ROCKY PLANETS , 2014, 1401.4195.

[24]  D. S. Acton,et al.  First Light Adaptive Optics Images from the Keck II Telescope: A New Era of High Angular Resolution Imagery , 2000 .

[25]  F. Fressin,et al.  KEPLER-14b: A MASSIVE HOT JUPITER TRANSITING AN F STAR IN A CLOSE VISUAL BINARY , 2011, 1106.5510.

[26]  Binarity in Brown Dwarfs: T Dwarf Binaries Discovered with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field P , 2002, astro-ph/0211470.

[27]  G. Jogesh Babu,et al.  Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy: With R Applications , 2012 .

[28]  D. Ciardi,et al.  SPECKLE CAMERA OBSERVATIONS FOR THE NASA KEPLER MISSION FOLLOW-UP PROGRAM , 2011 .

[29]  J. G. Robertson,et al.  GETTING LUCKY WITH ADAPTIVE OPTICS: FAST ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGE SELECTION IN THE VISIBLE WITH A LARGE TELESCOPE , 2008, 0805.1921.

[30]  W. Farr,et al.  ON THE FORMATION OF HOT JUPITERS IN STELLAR BINARIES , 2012, 1206.3529.

[31]  D. Barrado,et al.  Multiplicity in transiting planet-host stars - A lucky imaging study of Kepler candidates , 2012, 1208.0242.

[32]  Adam L. Kraus,et al.  THREE NEW ECLIPSING WHITE-DWARF–M-DWARF BINARIES DISCOVERED IN A SEARCH FOR TRANSITING PLANETS AROUND M-DWARFS , 2011, The Astrophysical Journal.

[33]  G. Jogesh Babu,et al.  Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy: Statistical inference , 2012 .

[34]  C. Baranec,et al.  Robo-AO: autonomous and replicable laser-adaptive-optics and science system , 2012, Other Conferences.

[35]  F. Fressin,et al.  THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS , 2013, 1301.0842.

[36]  M. R. Haas,et al.  A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet , 2013, Nature.

[37]  Darko Jevremovic,et al.  The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database , 2008, 0804.4473.

[38]  S. Dong,et al.  Long-term cycling of Kozai-Lidov cycles: extreme eccentricities and inclinations excited by a distant eccentric perturber. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[39]  Th. Henning,et al.  Binarity of transit host stars - Implications for planetary parameters , 2009, 0902.2179.

[40]  A. Dupree,et al.  ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGES. II. 12 KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST AND 15 CONFIRMED TRANSITING PLANETS , 2013, 1305.6548.

[41]  Cambridge,et al.  Lucky imaging: High angular resolution imaging in the visible from the ground , 2005, astro-ph/0507299.

[42]  David Charbonneau,et al.  Rejecting Astrophysical False Positives from the TrES Transiting Planet Survey: The Example of GSC 03885–00829 , 2006 .