Optimizing Stability and Stiffness Through Aggregate Base Gradation

Pavement base layer quality is vital for long-term performance. Low stiffness and shear strength can result in a loss of support and increased tensile stresses under loads. To maintain uniform support under concrete pavements and ensure satisfactory performance, a stable, nonerodible, drainable base layer is necessary. The primary objective of this paper is to present the analysis and evaluations conducted as part of the associated research and to recommend improvements to base layer aggregate gradations for the Class 5 and permeable aggregate base specifications used by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Improved aggregate classes are presented, considering gradation and aggregate shape properties. An analytical gradation analysis was introduced to establish an effective level of gravel-to-sand ratio of 1.4. Other analyses presented in this paper include the use of a revised resilient modulus model that was used in a Monte Carlo simulation to develop probabilities for resilient modulus values depending on gradation and season in Minnesota and the use of the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for comparing gradation and gravel-to-sand ratio with expected pavement performance. The gravel-to-sand ratio of 1.4 was identified with the following analysis methods: a coordination number and packing analysis, a discrete element model for load-carrying capacity, and a pavement performance analysis using the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide software.

[1]  Guy Doré,et al.  Gradation influence on frost susceptibility of base granular materials , 2008 .

[2]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Cost-Effective Base Type and Thickness for Long-Life Concrete Pavements , 2015 .

[3]  Arthur Newell Talbot,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE - ITS RELATION TO THE CEMENT, AGGREGATES AND WATER , 1923 .

[4]  Yuanjie Xiao,et al.  Best Value Granular Material for Road Foundations , 2012 .

[5]  Björn Birgisson,et al.  Gradation-based framework for asphalt mixture , 2013 .

[6]  Bernard Igbafen Izevbekhai,et al.  2011 MnROAD Mainline Concrete Construction: Cells 5, 6, and 63 , 2012 .

[7]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Simplified Design Table for Minnesota Concrete Pavements , 2014 .

[8]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Gradation Effects Influencing Mechanical Properties of Aggregate Base–Granular Subbase Materials in Minnesota , 2012 .

[9]  Björn Birgisson,et al.  Influence of aggregate packing structure on California bearing ratio values of unbound granular materials , 2014 .

[10]  Erol Tutumluer Practices for Unbound Aggregate Pavement Layers , 2013 .

[11]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Optimize Drainable Unbound Aggregate through Laboratory Tests , 2008 .

[12]  Guy Doré,et al.  Erosion susceptibility of granular pavement materials , 2007 .

[13]  Hao Wang,et al.  Evaluation of Effects of Variations in Aggregate Base Layer Properties on Flexible Pavement Performance , 2015 .

[14]  Bernard Igbafen Izevbekhai,et al.  Forensic evaluation of multiple cracking of a concrete test cell built over an open graded aggregate base , 2015 .

[15]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Resilient Modulus Behavior Estimated from Aggregate Source Properties , 2011 .

[16]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Gradation and Moisture Effects on Resilient Moduli of Aggregate Bases , 1998 .

[17]  Yuanjie Xiao Performance-based evaluation of unbound aggregates affecting mechanistic response and performance of flexible pavements , 2014 .