In recent years, DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO have been published as noteworthy large, cross-domain, and freely available knowledge graphs. Although extensively in use, these knowledge graphs are hard to compare against each other in a given setting. Thus, it is a challenge for researchers and developers to pick the best knowledge graph for their individual needs. In our recent survey, we devised and applied data quality criteria to the above-mentioned knowledge graphs. Furthermore, we proposed a framework for finding the most suitable knowledge graph for a given setting. With this paper we intend to ease the access to our in-depth survey by presenting simplified rules that map individual data quality requirements to specific knowledge graphs. However, this paper does not intend to replace our previously introduced decision-support framework. For an informed decision on which KG is best for you we still refer to our in-depth survey.
[1]
Christian Bizer,et al.
Quality-Driven Information Filtering- In the Context of Web-Based Information Systems
,
2007
.
[2]
Richard Y. Wang,et al.
Toward quality data: An attribute-based approach
,
2014,
Decis. Support Syst..
[3]
Achim Rettinger,et al.
Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO
,
2017,
Semantic Web.
[4]
Arthur B. Markman,et al.
Knowledge Representation
,
1998
.
[5]
Jens Lehmann,et al.
Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey
,
2015,
Semantic Web.