The double-helix point spread function enables precise and accurate measurement of 3D single-molecule localization and orientation

Single-molecule-based super-resolution fluorescence microscopy has recently been developed to surpass the diffraction limit by roughly an order of magnitude. These methods depend on the ability to precisely and accurately measure the position of a single-molecule emitter, typically by fitting its emission pattern to a symmetric estimator (e.g. centroid or 2D Gaussian). However, single-molecule emission patterns are not isotropic, and depend highly on the orientation of the molecule’s transition dipole moment, as well as its z-position. Failure to account for this fact can result in localization errors on the order of tens of nm for in-focus images, and ~50-200 nm for molecules at modest defocus. The latter range becomes especially important for three-dimensional (3D) single-molecule super-resolution techniques, which typically employ depths-of-field of up to ~2 μm. To address this issue we report the simultaneous measurement of precise and accurate 3D single-molecule position and 3D dipole orientation using the Double-Helix Point Spread Function (DH-PSF) microscope. We are thus able to significantly improve dipole-induced position errors, reducing standard deviations in lateral localization from ~2x worse than photon-limited precision (48 nm vs. 25 nm) to within 5 nm of photon-limited precision. Furthermore, by averaging many estimations of orientation we are able to improve from a lateral standard deviation of 116 nm (~4x worse than the precision, 28 nm) to 34 nm (within 6 nm).

[1]  Matthew D Lew,et al.  Rotational mobility of single molecules affects localization accuracy in super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. , 2013, Nano letters.

[2]  Chrysanthe Preza,et al.  Double helix PSF engineering for computational fluorescence microscopy imaging , 2012, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[3]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[4]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[5]  Thorsten Staudt,et al.  Molecular orientation affects localization accuracy in superresolution far-field fluorescence microscopy. , 2011, Nano letters.

[6]  S. Stallinga,et al.  Position and orientation estimation of fixed dipole emitters using an effective Hermite point spread function model. , 2012, Optics express.

[7]  Matthew D Lew,et al.  Simultaneous, accurate measurement of the 3D position and orientation of single molecules , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Jörg Enderlein,et al.  Orientation imaging of single molecules by wide-field epifluorescence microscopy , 2003 .

[9]  Travis J Gould,et al.  Nanoscale imaging of molecular positions and anisotropies , 2008, Nature Methods.

[10]  S. Hell Microscopy and its focal switch , 2008, Nature Methods.

[11]  David J. Norris,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS IMAGING OF INDIVIDUAL MOLECULES ALIGNED BOTH PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE OPTIC AXIS , 1998 .

[12]  W. E. Moerner,et al.  Microscopy beyond the diffraction limit using actively controlled single molecules , 2012, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  Jörg Enderlein,et al.  Image Analysis of Defocused Single-Molecule Images for Three-Dimensional Molecule Orientation Studies , 2004 .

[14]  Michael Unser,et al.  Super-resolution orientation estimation and localization of fluorescent dipoles using 3-D steerable filters. , 2009, Optics express.

[15]  M. Gustafsson Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  Virendra N. Mahajan,et al.  Zernike Polynomial and Wavefront Fitting , 2006 .

[17]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Lukas Novotny,et al.  Single-molecule orientations determined by direct emission pattern imaging , 2004 .

[19]  Matthew D Lew,et al.  The double-helix microscope super-resolves extended biological structures by localizing single blinking molecules in three dimensions with nanoscale precision. , 2012, Applied physics letters.

[20]  Paul R Selvin,et al.  Polarization effect on position accuracy of fluorophore localization. , 2006, Optics express.

[21]  Samuel J. Lord,et al.  Three-dimensional, single-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the diffraction limit by using a double-helix point spread function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Matthew D. Lew,et al.  Three-dimensional superresolution colocalization of intracellular protein superstructures and the cell surface in live Caulobacter crescentus , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[24]  W E Moerner,et al.  Photophysical properties of acene DCDHF fluorophores: long-wavelength single-molecule emitters designed for cellular imaging. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[25]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[26]  S. Hess,et al.  Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples , 2008, Nature Methods.

[27]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Whole cell 3D STORM reveals interactions between cellular structures with nanometer-scale resolution , 2008, Nature Methods.