Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

[1]  Justin M Aronoff,et al.  The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  Localization of virtual sound sources with bilateral hearing aids in realistic acoustical scenes. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. V. van Opstal,et al.  Relearning Sound Localization with a New Ear , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  William A. Yost,et al.  Head Movements Allow Listeners Bilaterally Implanted With Cochlear Implants to Resolve Front-Back Confusions , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants. , 2016, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  M. Kompis,et al.  Minimum Audible Angle, Just Noticeable Interaural Differences and Speech Intelligibility with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Clinical Speech Processors , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  Andreas Büchner,et al.  Experience of uni- and bilateral cochlear implant users with a microphone positioned in the pinna , 2004 .

[8]  William E O'Neill,et al.  Auditory Spatial Perception Dynamically Realigns with Changing Eye Position , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  Directional Microphone Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users: A Within-Subjects Comparison , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Niels Søgaard Jensen,et al.  Laboratory and Field Study of the Potential Benefits of Pinna Cue-Preserving Hearing Aids , 2013, Trends in amplification.

[11]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  An Influence of Directional Microphones on the Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Perception by Cochlear Implant Users , 2015 .

[12]  P Nopp,et al.  Sound Localization in Bilateral Users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implants , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Wei Dai,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for the efficient estimation of the psychometric function using the updated maximum-likelihood adaptive procedure , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[14]  T. Fischer,et al.  Dynamic sound field audiometry: static and dynamic spatial hearing tests in the full horizontal plane , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  Paul M. Hofman,et al.  Relearning sound localization with new ears , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[17]  Ruth Y. Litovsky,et al.  A systematic assessment of a cochlear implant processor's ability to encode interaural time differences , 2018, 2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC).

[18]  Alexandra Kaider,et al.  Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  Alan Kan,et al.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  W. Hartmann Localization of sound in rooms. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[23]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[24]  Tomasz R Letowski,et al.  Localization Error: Accuracy and Precision of Auditory Localization , 2011 .

[25]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer , 2018, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Using hearing aid directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms to enhance cochlear implant performance , 2004 .

[27]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[28]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[29]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Two-Dimensional Localization of Virtual Sound Sources in Cochlear-Implant Listeners , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[30]  K. Saberi,et al.  Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Tina M. Grieco-Calub,et al.  Sound Localization Skills in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants and in Children With Normal Acoustic Hearing , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Alan Kan,et al.  The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[33]  R. Häusler,et al.  In-the-Canal Versus Behind-the-Ear Microphones Improve Spatial Discrimination on the Side of the Head in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.