Chemical sensors for water monitoring: diversity of approaches to behavioral modeling

Mathematical models of chemo-electrical characteristics of ion-sensitive chemical sensors is essential for development of measuring algorithms to be implemented in firmware of water probes. A crucial point of algorithms like these is a data fusion task, where a matrix of sensors sensitive to a matrix of ions give a matrix of electrical responses. Hence unknown ion activities may be calculated if a parameterized mathematical model of sensor is known. During three years of activity in FP6 WARMER project a diversity of physical and behavioral approaches to sensors modeling has been considered. Since a model selection influence accuracy of measurements, then a plenty of different modeling approaches was discussed and practically verified on the base of laboratory measurements of sensors. Some typical measurements have been used and verification of accuracy of existing has been performed. This contribution contains a discussion of possibilities of modeling of potentiometric sensors. Several physical and behavioral models have been taken into account. It has been shown that in data fusion application essential is small number of parameters and small calculation complexity since accuracy of model has not to be better than accuracy of sensors which is rather low. Hence we must focus on a trade-off between necessity of accurate modeling and availability of accurate sensors.

[1]  Zbigniew Brzozka,et al.  System for European Water Monitoring (SEWING) , 2005, EnviroInfo.

[2]  Piotr Grabiec,et al.  An integrated system for Water Risk Management in EuRope - WARMER , 2007 .

[3]  Leszek J. Opalski Data Fusion for CHEMFET Arrays , 2002 .

[4]  Y. Umezawa,et al.  Selectivity coefficients for ion-selective electrodes: Recommended methods for reporting KA,Bpot values (Technical Report) , 1995 .

[5]  Jan Ogrodzki Modeling of potentiometric sensors sensitive to ions of valency one and two for possible applications in WARMER project , 2007, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[6]  Richard B. Brown,et al.  Micropotentiometric sensors , 2003 .

[7]  Jan Ogrodzki Ion sensors: the need of behavioral modeling for the WARMER project , 2008, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[8]  R. Buck,et al.  Tracing the history of selective ion sensors. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  E. Bakker,et al.  General description of the simultaneous response of potentiometric ionophore-based sensors to ions of different charge. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  Selectivity of potentiometric ion sensors. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  G. Horvai The selectivity of polymer membrane ion-selective electrodes obeying the ion exchanger model , 1997 .

[12]  M. Ganjali,et al.  The fabrication of potentiometric membrane sensors and their applications , 2007 .

[13]  Piotr Z. Wieczorek,et al.  Electrical properties of potentiometric sensors: an empirical study , 2007, Symposium on Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments (WILGA).

[14]  CAS-No Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive and its , 2003 .