Circulation responses to snow albedo feedback in climate change

[1] Climate change is expected to cause a reduction in the spatial extent of snow cover on land. Recent work suggests that this will exert a local influence on the atmosphere and the hydrology of snow-margin areas through the snow-albedo feedback (SAF) mechanism. A significant fraction of variability among IPCC AR4 general circulation model (GCM) predictions for future summertime climate change over these areas is related to the models' representation of springtime SAF. In this study, we demonstrate a nonlocal influence of SAF on the summertime circulation in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere. Increased land surface warming in models with stronger SAF is associated with large-scale sea-level pressure anomalies over the northern oceans and a poleward intensified subtropical jet. We find that up to 25–30% and, on average, 5–10% of the inter-model spread in projections of the circulation response to climate change is linearly related to SAF strength.

[1]  Ross D. Brown,et al.  Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow‐albedo feedback , 2007 .

[2]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[3]  A. Hall,et al.  What Controls the Strength of Snow-Albedo Feedback? , 2007 .

[4]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Contemporary Changes of the Hydrological Cycle over the Contiguous United States: Trends Derived from In Situ Observations , 2004 .

[5]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[6]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[7]  D. Entekhabi,et al.  Relative impacts of Siberian and North American snow anomalies on the winter Arctic Oscillation , 2003 .

[8]  G. Meehl,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, edited by , 2022 .

[9]  T. Osborn,et al.  Simulating the winter North Atlantic Oscillation: the roles of internal variability and greenhouse gas forcing , 2004 .

[10]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Eurasian snow cover variability and northern hemisphere climate predictability , 1999 .

[11]  John E. Walsh,et al.  Arctic Sea Ice Variability in the Context of Recent Atmospheric Circulation Trends , 2000 .

[12]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Orographic Constraints on a Modeled Siberian Snow–Tropospheric–Stratospheric Teleconnection Pathway , 2004 .

[13]  V. Caron,et al.  United states. , 2018, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[14]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Spatial Weighting and Iterative Projection Methods for EOFs , 2009 .

[15]  S. Bony,et al.  How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes , 2006 .

[16]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[17]  B. Santer,et al.  Human-Induced Changes in the Hydrology of the Western United States , 2008, Science.

[18]  A. Hall,et al.  Improving predictions of summer climate change in the United States , 2008 .

[19]  P. Kushner,et al.  The dynamical response to snow cover perturbations in a large ensemble of atmospheric GCM integrations. , 2008 .

[20]  John T. Fasullo,et al.  A Stratified Diagnosis of the Indian Monsoon—Eurasian Snow Cover Relationship , 2004 .

[21]  M. Holland,et al.  Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models , 2003 .