A Flowstream Approach for Sustainable Sanitation Systems

Reaching the Millennium Development Goals for Sanitation is a challenge. To address this challenge, numerous technological innovations have been developed. But with so many innovations and a wide range of existing technologies appropriate in different settings, difficulties with communication and knowledge dissemination hinder informed decision-making and the integration of all sanitation elements. This chapter describes a novel method for organizing and defining sanitation systems to facilitate informed decision-making and an integrated approach. Technologies are categorized based on their ‘Product-Process’ specificity and then linked into logical systems using a ‘Flowstream’ concept. Technologies are grouped and used to construct seven logical systems. Additionally, according to the flowstream, suitable technologies are grouped and given a score for each of the criteria. The advantages and shortcomings of the flowstream approach to sanitation system planning and the differences between ‘system’ and ‘technology’ are discussed and a set of terms and concepts that can be used to standardize the way in which sanitation is thought of and communicated about is proposed.

[1]  Jose Carlos Melo,et al.  The experience of condominial water and sewerage systems in Brazil : case studies from Brasilia, Salvador and Parauebas , 2005 .

[2]  Albert M. Wright,et al.  Toward a strategic sanitation approach : improving the sustainability of urban sanitation in developing countries , 1997 .

[3]  J Lienert,et al.  Real-life efficiency of urine source separation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  M Oldenburg,et al.  Innovative technologies for decentralised water-, wastewater and biowaste management in urban and peri-urban areas. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Agnes Montangero,et al.  Assessing nutrient flows in septic tanks by eliciting expert judgement: a promising method in the context of developing countries. , 2007, Water research.

[6]  B. Escher,et al.  Pilot experiments with electrodialysis and ozonation for the production of a fertiliser from urine. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[8]  B Vinnerås,et al.  Experiences and suggestions for collection systems for source-separated urine and faeces. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  D Mavinic,et al.  RECOVERY OF STRUVITE FROM STORED HUMAN URINE , 2008, Environmental technology.

[10]  A Montangero,et al.  Solid-liquid separation of faecal sludge using drying beds in Ghana: implications for nutrient recycling in urban agriculture. , 2006, Water research.

[11]  Max Maurer,et al.  Struvite precipitation thermodynamics in source-separated urine. , 2007, Water research.

[12]  Duncan Mara,et al.  A new paradigm for low-cost urban water supplies and sanitation in developing countries , 2008 .

[13]  P. Brunner,et al.  Metabolism of the Anthroposphere , 1991 .

[14]  Christian Zurbrügg,et al.  Helminth eggs inactivation efficiency by faecal sludge dewatering and co-composting in tropical climates. , 2007, Water research.

[15]  Be Evans,et al.  Sanitation 21: Simple Approaches to Complex Sanitation - A Draft Framework for Analysis , 2006 .