Recruitment and reach in a school-based pediatric obesity intervention trial in rural areas

Introduction The purpose of this study is to evaluate two recruitment strategies on schools and participant participation rates and representativeness (reach) within a pediatric obesity treatment trial tailored for families who live in rural areas. Methods Recruitment of schools was evaluated based on their progress toward enrolling participants. Recruitment and reach of participants were evaluated using (1) participation rates and (2) representativeness of demographics and weight status of participants compared to eligible participants (who did not consent and enroll) and all students (regardless of eligibility). School recruitment, as well as participant recruitment and reach, were evaluated across recruitment methods comparing opt-in (i.e., caregivers agreed to allow their child to be screened for eligibility) vs. screen-first (i.e., all children screened for eligibility). Results Of the 395 schools contacted, 34 schools (8.6%) expressed initial interest; of these, 27 (79%) proceeded to recruit participants, and 18 (53%) ultimately participated in the program. Of schools who initiated recruitment, 75% of schools using the opt-in method and 60% of schools using the screen-first method continued participation and were able to recruit a sufficient number of participants. The average participation rate (number of enrolled individuals divided by those who were eligible) from all 18 schools was 21.6%. This percentage was higher in schools using the screen-first method (average of 29.7%) compared to schools using the opt-in method (13.5%). Study participants were representative of the student population based on sex (female), race (White), and eligibility for free and reduced-price lunch. Study participants had higher body mass index (BMI) metrics (BMI, BMIz, and BMI%) than eligible non-participants. Conclusions Schools using the opt-in recruitment were more likely to enroll at least 5 families and administer the intervention. However, the participation rate was higher in screen-first schools. The overall study sample was representative of the school demographics.

[1]  Jini E. Puma,et al.  Implementation Factors and Teacher Experience of the Integrated Nutrition Education Program: A Mixed Methods Program Evaluation. , 2022, The Journal of school health.

[2]  E. Ellerbeck,et al.  Recruitment and reach in a pragmatic behavioral weight loss randomized controlled trial: implications for real-world primary care practice , 2020, BMC Family Practice.

[3]  Deepthiman Gowda,et al.  Mixed Methods Program Evaluation , 2019, Research Methods in Health Humanities.

[4]  Kelsey Dean,et al.  iAmHealthy: Rationale, design and application of a family-based mHealth pediatric obesity intervention for rural children. , 2019, Contemporary clinical trials.

[5]  A. Green,et al.  Recruitment of Schools for Intervention Research to Reduce Health Disparities for Sexual and Gender Minority Students , 2020, The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses.

[6]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study) , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[7]  R. Bailey,et al.  Re: Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study). , 2018 .

[8]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study) , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[9]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[10]  Emily S. Walsh,et al.  Screening for Obesity and Intervention for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force , 2017, JAMA.

[11]  G. Baker,et al.  Exploring childhood obesity prevention among diverse ethnic groups in schools and places of worship: Recruitment, acceptability and feasibility of data collection and intervention components , 2017, Preventive medicine reports.

[12]  Y. Liao,et al.  RE-AIM Analysis of a School-Based Nutrition Education Intervention in Kindergarteners. , 2017, The Journal of school health.

[13]  J. Skelton,et al.  Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US children, 1999‐2014 , 2016, Obesity.

[14]  Katherine Y Grannon,et al.  Project BreakFAST: Rationale, design, and recruitment and enrollment methods of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate an intervention to improve school breakfast program participation in rural high schools , 2016, Contemporary clinical trials communications.

[15]  S. Hooker,et al.  Physical Activity–Related Policy and Environmental Strategies to Prevent Obesity in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2002–2013 , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.

[16]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Childhood obesity.

[17]  S. Bass,et al.  A comprehensive review of school-based body mass index screening programs and their implications for school health: do the controversies accurately reflect the research? , 2015, The Journal of school health.

[18]  K. Zajac,et al.  Combinations of Obesity Prevention Strategies in US Elementary Schools: A Critical Review , 2015, The Journal of Primary Prevention.

[19]  Tommaso Tempesti,et al.  Culturally Tailored, Family-Centered, Behavioral Obesity Intervention for Latino-American Preschool-aged Children , 2012, Pediatrics.

[20]  F. Tylavsky,et al.  Methods and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial treating early childhood obesity: the Positive Lifestyles for Active Youngsters (Team PLAY) trial. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[21]  D. Reed,et al.  Obesity in rural youth: looking beyond nutrition and physical activity. , 2011, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[22]  Thomas R. Frieden,et al.  School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity. , 2011, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[23]  R. Wing,et al.  Evaluation of active and passive recruitment methods used in randomized controlled trials targeting pediatric obesity. , 2009, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[24]  Corby K. Martin,et al.  Louisiana (LA) Health: design and methods for a childhood obesity prevention program in rural schools. , 2008, Contemporary clinical trials.

[25]  Z. Yin,et al.  Training health care professionals to manage overweight adolescents: experience in rural Georgia communities. , 2008, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[26]  S. Barlow,et al.  Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. , 2007, Pediatrics.

[27]  M. Lipsky,et al.  Is Rural Residency a Risk Factor for Overweight and Obesity for U.S. Children? , 2007, Obesity.

[28]  S. Baker,et al.  Summary Report , 2006 .

[29]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996-2000. , 2003, The Journal of school health.

[30]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[31]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.