Data blinding for the nEDM experiment at PSI

Psychological bias towards, or away from, prior measurements or theory predictions is an intrinsic threat to any data analysis. While various methods can be used to try to avoid such a bias, e.g. actively avoiding looking at the result, only data blinding is a traceable and trustworthy method that can circumvent the bias and convince a public audience that there is not even an accidental psychological bias. Data blinding is nowadays a standard practice in particle physics, but it is particularly difficult for experiments searching for the neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM), as several cross measurements, in particular of the magnetic field, create a self-consistent network into which it is hard to inject a false signal. We present an algorithm that modifies the data without influencing the experiment. Results of an automated analysis of the data are used to change the recorded spin state of a few neutrons within each measurement cycle. The flexible algorithm may be applied twice (or more) to the data, thus providing the option of sequentially applying various blinding offsets for separate analysis steps with independent teams. The subtle manner in which the data are modified allows one subsequently to adjust the algorithm and to produce a re-blinded data set without revealing the initial blinding offset. The method was designed for the 2015/2016 measurement campaign of the nEDM experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute. However, it can be re-used with minor modification for the follow-up experiment n2EDM, and may be suitable for comparable projects elsewhere.

[1]  Norman F. Ramsey,et al.  A Molecular Beam Resonance Method with Separated Oscillating Fields , 1950 .

[2]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[3]  I. Khriplovich,et al.  What is the value of the neutron electric dipole moment in the Kobayashi-Maskawa model? , 1982 .

[4]  John Ellis,et al.  Theory of the neutron electric dipole moment , 1989 .

[5]  Mark Trodden Electroweak Baryogenesis , 1998 .

[6]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Geometric-phase-induced false electric dipole moment signals for particles in traps , 2004, physics/0510134.

[7]  M. Pospelov,et al.  Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics , 2005, hep-ph/0504231.

[8]  Aaron Roodman,et al.  Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics , 2005 .

[9]  A. Vacheret,et al.  A precise measurement of sin2θW at low Q2 in Møller scattering , 2005 .

[10]  Pierre L'Ecuyer,et al.  Improved long-period generators based on linear recurrences modulo 2 , 2004, TOMS.

[11]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron. , 2006 .

[12]  P Winter,et al.  Improved measurement of the positive-muon lifetime and determination of the Fermi constant. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[13]  Robert Golub,et al.  Experimental searches for the neutron electric dipole moment , 2009 .

[14]  All-sky search for gravitational-wave bursts in the first joint LIGO-GEO-Virgo run , 2010 .

[15]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Final Results of the All-sky Search for Gravitational-wave Bursts in the First Joint LIGO-GEO-Virgo Run , 2010 .

[16]  Michael G. Schmidt,et al.  The Neutron and Its Role in Cosmology and Particle Physics , 2011 .

[17]  P. W. Cattaneo,et al.  New limit on the lepton-flavour violating decay $\mu^{+} \to e^{+} \gamma$ , 2011, 1107.5547.

[18]  S Yamashita,et al.  New limit on the lepton-flavor-violating decay μ+→e+γ. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[19]  E Aprile,et al.  Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[20]  M. Ramsey-Musolf,et al.  Electroweak baryogenesis , 2012, 1206.2942.

[21]  U. van Kolck,et al.  Electric Dipole Moments of Nucleons, Nuclei, and Atoms: The Standard Model and Beyond , 2013, 1303.2371.

[22]  B. Lauss,et al.  Ultracold Neutron Production at the Second Spallation Target of the Paul Scherrer Institute , 2014 .

[23]  R. Golub Blind Analysis in Physics Experiments: Is this Trip Necessary? , 2014 .

[24]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Apparatus for measurement of the electric dipole moment of the neutron using a cohabiting atomic-mercury magnetometer , 2013, 1305.7336.

[25]  V. Hélaine,et al.  Neutron Electric Dipole Moment measurement: simultaneous spin analysis and preliminary data analysis , 2014 .

[26]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  A measurement of the neutron to 199Hg magnetic moment ratio , 2014, 1410.8259.

[27]  The nEDM experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute , 2015, 1510.06174.

[28]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  PNPI differential EDM spectrometer and latest results of measurements of the neutron electric dipole moment , 2015 .

[29]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Gravitational depolarization of ultracold neutrons: Comparison with data , 2015, 1506.06563.

[30]  G. Bison,et al.  A device for simultaneous spin analysis of ultracold neutrons , 2015, The European Physical Journal A.

[31]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Revised experimental upper limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron , 2015, 1509.04411.

[32]  G. Bison,et al.  Ultracold neutron detection with 6Li-doped glass scintillators , 2016 .

[33]  S. N. Ivanov,et al.  Search for Axionlike Dark Matter through Nuclear Spin Precession in Electric and Magnetic Fields , 2017, 1708.06367.

[34]  G. Bison,et al.  Neutron optics of the PSI ultracold-neutron source: characterization and simulation , 2019 .

[35]  G. Bison,et al.  nEDM experiment at PSI: Data-taking strategy and sensitivity of the dataset , 2018, EPJ Web of Conferences.

[36]  W. Griffith,et al.  Optically pumped Cs magnetometers enabling a high-sensitivity search for the neutron electric dipole moment , 2019, Physical Review A.

[37]  M. Burghoff,et al.  Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron. , 2020, Physical review letters.