A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems

Various attempts have been made to model flow in shale gas systems. However, there is currently little consensus regarding the impact of molecular and Knudsen diffusion on flow behavior over time in such systems. Direct measurement or model-based estimation of matrix permeability for these “ultra-tight” reservoirs has proven unreliable. The composition of gas produced from tight gas and shale gas reservoirs varies with time for a variety of reasons. The cause of flowing gas compositional change typically cited is selective desorption of gases from the surface of the kerogen in the case of shale. However, other drivers for gas fractionation are important when pore throat dimensions are small enough. Pore throat diameters on the order of molecular mean free path lengths will create non-Darcy flow conditions, where permeability becomes a strong function of pressure. At the low permeabilities found in shale gas systems, the dusty-gas model for flow should be used, which couples diffusion to advective flow. In this study we implement the dusty-gas model into a fluid flow modeling tool based on the TOUGH+ family of codes. We examine the effects of Knudsen diffusion on gas composition in ultra-tight rock. We show that for very small average pore throat diameters, lighter gases are preferentially produced at concentrations significantly higher than in situ conditions. Furthermore, we illustrate a methodology which uses measurements of gas composition to more uniquely determine the permeability of tight reservoirs. We also describe how gas composition measurement could be used to identify flow boundaries in these reservoir systems. We discuss how new measurement techniques and data collection practices should be implemented in order to take advantage of this method. Our contributions include a new, fit-for-purpose numerical model based on the TOUGH+ code capable of characterizing transport effects including permeability adjustment and diffusion in micro- and nano-scale porous media.

[1]  George J. Moridis,et al.  A Numerical Study of Performance for Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems , 2009 .

[2]  Gao Chao,et al.  Modeling Multilayer Gas Reservoirs Including Sorption Effects , 1994 .

[3]  Y. Nodasaka,et al.  Molybdenum-vanadium-based molecular sieves with microchannels of seven-membered rings of corner-sharing metal oxide octahedra. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  J. Quirk,et al.  Permeability of porous solids , 1961 .

[5]  L. Mattar.  Production Analysis and Forecasting of Shale Gas Reservoirs: Case History-Based Approach , 2008 .

[6]  P. Schettler,et al.  Contributions to Total Storage Capacity in Devonian Shales , 1991 .

[7]  T. Blasingame,et al.  Improved Permeability Prediction Relations for Low Permeability Sands , 2007 .

[8]  Daniel C. Harris,et al.  Quantitative Chemical Analysis , 1968, Nature.

[9]  G. David,et al.  Gas productive fractured shales; an overview and update , 2000 .

[10]  Deoki N. Saraf,et al.  Diffusion of Methane, Ethane, Propane, and n-Butane in Water from 25 to 43° , 1965 .

[11]  F. Javadpour,et al.  Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments , 2007 .

[12]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Effective Correlation of Apparent Gas Permeability in Tight Porous Media , 2010 .

[13]  Quinn R. Passey,et al.  From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir - Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[14]  R. Bustin,et al.  Binary gas adsorption/desorption isotherms: effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxide selectivity over methane , 2000 .

[15]  Clark K. Colton,et al.  Restricted diffusion in liquids within fine pores , 1973 .

[16]  Ebrahim Fathi,et al.  Nonlinear Sorption Kinetics and Surface Diffusion Effects on Gas Transport in Low-permeability Formations , 2009 .

[17]  John P. Collins,et al.  Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Propane in Hydrogen Permselective Membrane Reactors , 1996 .

[18]  N. Larkin,et al.  On dusty gas model governed by the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation , 2004 .

[19]  Jing Li,et al.  Assessing surface permeabilities from transient guest profiles in nanoporous host materials. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  A. Corey.  Measurement of Water and Air Permeability in Unsaturated Soil , 1957 .

[21]  Fathi M. Allan,et al.  Dusty gas model of flow through naturally occurring porous media , 2004, Appl. Math. Comput..

[22]  R. Raghavan,et al.  An Analysis of Horizontal Wells Intercepted by Multiple Fractures , 1997 .

[23]  James Wei,et al.  Diffusion mechanism of hydrocarbons in zeolites—I. Theory , 1992 .

[24]  Erdal Ozkan,et al.  A Semianalytical, Pressure-Transient Model for Horizontal and Multilateral Wells in Composite, Layered, and Compartmentalized Reservoirs , 2006 .

[25]  R. Parton.  Molecular transport and reaction in zeolites , 1995 .

[26]  T. G. Cowling,et al.  The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 1939 .

[27]  C. Whitson,et al.  Estimating Diffusion Coefficients of Dense Fluids , 1993 .

[28]  K. Pruess,et al.  The Use of Fick's Law for Modeling Trace Gas Diffusion in Porous Media , 2003 .

[29]  D. W. Pollock,et al.  Gas transport in unsaturated zones: Multicomponent systems and the adequacy of Fick's laws , 1989 .

[30]  Erdal Ozkan,et al.  Productivity and Drainage Area of Fractured Horizontal Wells in Tight Gas Reservoirs , 2008 .

[31]  H. Davis,et al.  Evidence for single file diffusion of ethane in the molecular sieve AlPO4-5 , 1995 .

[32]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties , 1988 .

[33]  Geert Versteeg,et al.  The use of the dusty-gas model for the description of mass transport with chemical reaction in porous media , 1995 .