Interference in localizing tactile stimuli

A series of experiments investigated the ability of subjects to localize a tactile stimulus in the presence of an additional, extraneous tactile stimulus. The subject’s task was to localize a tactile stimulus (target) presented at one of several locations on his or her left index fingerpad. The target stimulus, generated on a 6×24 array of stimulators, was presented either by itself or in the presence of an extraneous stimulus (masker) that either preceded or followed the target. The localizability of the target was affected by the temporal separation between the target and masker in much the same way as previous studies have shown identification of tactile patterns to be affected. Unlike previous identification results, presenting the masking stimulus to the same location as the target interfered with localizability, although not as much as did presenting the masker to a different location. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for identification and discrimination of tactile patterns.

[1]  P. Evans,et al.  Vibrotactile masking: Temporal integration, persistence, and strengths of representations , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  B. Green.  The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli , 1975 .

[4]  J C Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile pattern recognition and discrimination at several body sites , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  G. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysical Measurements of Enhancement, Suppression, and Surface Gradient Effects in Vibrotaction , 1979 .

[6]  F. Attneave.  Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods, and results. , 1961 .

[7]  G. Békésy,et al.  Neural Volleys and the Similarity between Some Sensations Produced by Tones and by Skin Vibrations , 1957 .

[8]  James C. Craig,et al.  Temporal integration and vibrotactile backward masking. , 1986 .

[9]  J C Craig,et al.  The role of onset in the perception of sequentially presented vibrotactile patterns , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  T. R Fisher,et al.  Active touch. The mechanism of recognition of objects by manipulation. A multi-disciplinary approach: Edited by George Gordon. Pp. 275. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978. Hard cover £19.50, flexi cover £11.00 , 1979 .

[11]  J C Craig,et al.  Modes of vibrotactile pattern generation. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Verrillo Rt,et al.  Backward enhancement and suppression of vibrotactile sensation. , 1979 .

[13]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Bilateral apparent haptic movement , 1968 .

[14]  Frank A. Geldard,et al.  Sensory saltation : metastability in the perceptual world , 1977 .

[15]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Tactile perception of sequentially presented spatial patterns , 1966 .

[16]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Perceived order in different sense modalities. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  J C Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile masking: A comparison of energy and pattern maskers , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Extracting identity and location information from briefly presented letter arrays , 1976 .

[19]  J. Craig.  Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J. Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Marshall.  THE SKIN SENSES , 1969 .

[22]  Dorothy Rose Disher.  The Effect of Pressure Magnitude on Cutaneous Localization , 1933 .

[23]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Apparent haptic movement , 1966 .

[24]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual localization: age and practice. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  J C Craig,et al.  A comparison of discrimination and identification of vibrotactile patterns , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  E. Pritchard.  CUTANEOUS TACTILE LOCALIZATION , 1931 .

[27]  F. A. Geldard,et al.  The Cutaneous "Rabbit": A Perceptual Illusion , 1972, Science.

[28]  H. Helson.  THE TAU EFFECT--AN EXAMPLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RELATIVITY. , 1931, Science.

[29]  D. Kenshalo.  Sensory Functions of the Skin of Humans , 2011, Springer US.

[30]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  A lateral masking effect in tactile and blurred visual letter recognition , 1976 .

[31]  F A Geldard,et al.  Saltation in somesthesis. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  James C. Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile letter recognition: The effects of a ma king stimulus , 1976 .