Rewarding Multitasking: Negative Effects of an Incentive on Problem Solving under Divided Attention

Research has consistently shown negative effects of multitasking on tasks such as problem solving. This study was designed to investigate the impact of an incentive when solving problems in a multitasking situation. Incentives have generally been shown to increase problem solving (e.g., Wieth and Burns, 2006), however, it is unclear whether an incentive can increase problem solving while attentional resources are divided. Participants were either given an incentive or not and asked to complete incremental and insight problems while either in a dual-task or single task condition. After solving the problems participants were given a surprise memory test. Results showed that the incentive only led to increases in problem solving in the single task condition but not the dual-task condition. Furthermore, results showed that an incentive in the dual-task condition led to an increase in recall of irrelevant information. These findings indicate that an incentive cannot ameliorate the detrimental effects of multitasking when problem solving and may even lead to an increase in irrelevant information processing.

[1]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[4]  M. Lesch,et al.  Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements? , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[6]  R H Logie,et al.  Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[7]  W J Horrey,et al.  Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[8]  Daniel M. Belenky,et al.  Examining the Role of Manipulatives and Metacognition on Engagement, Learning, and Transfer , 2009, J. Probl. Solving.

[9]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Effects of Cover Stories on Problem Solving in a Statistics Course , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[10]  Mareike B. Wieth,et al.  Time of day effects on problem solving: When the non-optimal is optimal , 2011 .

[11]  D. Strayer,et al.  Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory in problem solving , 2003 .

[13]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[14]  Michael S. Gendron,et al.  Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[15]  N. Yeung,et al.  Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Lavric,et al.  Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks: an ERP study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[20]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  Metacognition of multitasking: How well do we predict the costs of divided attention? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  B. Dritschel,et al.  Gender differences in the dual-task effects on autobiographical memory retrieval during social problem solving. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Ruth M. J. Byrne,et al.  Attention and Working Memory in Insight Problem-Solving , 2005 .

[23]  Yunn-Wen Lien,et al.  The Different Role of Working Memory in Open-Ended Versus Closed-Ended Creative Problem Solving: A Dual-Process Theory Account , 2013 .

[24]  G. H. Lunney,et al.  USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[25]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[26]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Logie,et al.  Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[28]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M[superscript 2]: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. , 2010 .

[29]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual-differences approach , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  The influence of strength of drive on functional fixedness and perceptual recognition. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  William J Horrey,et al.  Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Charles A. Van Stockum,et al.  Enclothed Cognition and Controlled Attention during Insight Problem-Solving , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[34]  Etienne Koechlin,et al.  Divided Representation of Concurrent Goals in the Human Frontal Lobes , 2010, Science.

[35]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Marie-Louise Mares,et al.  Background television and reading performance , 1991 .

[37]  A. Allport,et al.  Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection , 1999 .

[38]  Alan Poling,et al.  Effects of a Multicomponent Monetary Incentive Program on the Performance of Truck Drivers , 1996 .

[39]  G. Latham,et al.  Employee reaction to continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules involving a monetary incentive. , 1982 .

[40]  Tom H. A. van der Voort,et al.  The Impact of Background Radio and Television on High School Students' Homework Performance , 2003 .

[41]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001 .

[42]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Bruce D Burns,et al.  Incentives improve performance on both incremental and insight problem solving , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  D. Nebeker,et al.  The Influence of Monetary Incentives on Goal Choice, Goal Commitment, and Task Performance , 1988 .

[45]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[46]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  ATTENTION IN THE ACQUISITION AND EXPRESSION OF AUTOMATICITY , 1996 .

[47]  Kenneth O. McGraw,et al.  Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. , 1979 .

[48]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Strategy Shifts in the ADM Task 1 The Minimal Control Principle Predicts Strategy Shifts in the Abstract Decision Making Task , 2010 .