The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Kennedy. Self-monitoring recall during two tasks after traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. , 2004, American journal of speech-language pathology.
[2] John Dunlosky,et al. Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .
[3] T. O. Nelson,et al. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.
[4] Laura E. Knouse,et al. Does ADHD in Adults Affect the Relative Accuracy of Metamemory Judgments? , 2006, Journal of attention disorders.
[5] John Dunlosky,et al. Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. , 1994 .
[6] T. O. Nelson,et al. Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.
[7] Janet Metcalfe,et al. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[8] Jennifer Wiley,et al. Foundational Studies 1-1-2005 Understanding the Delayed-Keyword Effect on Metacomprehension Accuracy , 2013 .
[9] Asher Koriat,et al. The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning , 2005 .
[10] T. O. Nelson,et al. Anchoring Effects in the Absolute Accuracy of Immediate versus Delayed Judgments of Learning. , 2004 .
[11] Barbara A. Spellman,et al. Measuring memory and metamemory: Theoretical and statistical problems with assessing learning (in general) and using gamma (in particular) to do so. , 2008 .
[12] Lola L. Cuddy,et al. Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation , 1969 .
[13] T. O. Nelson,et al. When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .
[14] L. Hedges. Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .
[15] P. Scheck. HOW DO JUDGMENTS OF INTENTION (JOIS) DIFFER FROM JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING (JOLS) , 2006 .
[16] Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL Accuracy , 1997 .
[17] A. Miyake,et al. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .
[18] Barbara A. Spellman,et al. When Predictions Create Reality: Judgments of Learning May Alter What They Are Intended to Assess , 1992 .
[19] T. O. Nelson,et al. Developmental trends in children's memory monitoring , 2000 .
[20] C. A. Weaver,et al. Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[21] T. O. Nelson,et al. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.
[22] J. Dunlosky,et al. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs) , 2006, Memory.
[23] A. Koriat. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .
[24] Lisa K. Son,et al. Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[25] F. Craik,et al. The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .
[26] Matthew G. Rhodes,et al. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[27] H. Pashler,et al. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.
[28] Klaus Oberauer,et al. Control of the contents of working memory--a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] R. Griffiths,et al. Drugs, memory, and metamemory: a dose-effect study with lorazepam and scopolamine. , 2005, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.
[30] Matthew G. Rhodes,et al. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[31] M. Borenstein. Effect sizes for continuous data. , 2009 .
[32] William R. Shadish,et al. Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .
[33] Michael J. Serra,et al. Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] C. A. Weaver,et al. Judgments of Learning at Delays: Shifts in Response Patterns or Increased Metamemory Accuracy? , 1997 .
[35] J. Metcalfe,et al. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[36] A. Koriat,et al. Metacognitive Judgments and their Accuracy , 2002 .
[37] J. Metcalfe,et al. A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .
[38] Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: Immediate and delayed judgments of learning , 2011, Memory & cognition.
[39] Asher Koriat,et al. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[40] T. O. Nelson,et al. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. , 1997, Acta psychologica.
[41] T. O. Nelson,et al. Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[42] J. Dunlosky,et al. Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. , 1997, Psychology and aging.
[43] K. Yorkston,et al. The effects of frontal injury on “on-line” self-monitoring during verbal learning by adults with diffuse brain injury , 2004 .
[44] M. Kennedy,et al. Predictions of recall and study strategy decisions after diffuse brain injury , 2003, Brain injury.
[45] J. Metcalfe,et al. Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .
[46] Ayanna K. Thomas,et al. Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[47] John Dunlosky,et al. Applied Metacognition: Influence of practice tests on the accuracy of predicting memory performance for paired associates, sentences, and text material , 2002 .
[48] L. Hedges,et al. The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .
[49] Pierre-Jean Marescaux,et al. Metacognition : process, function and use , 2002 .
[50] C. A. Weaver,et al. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[51] R. Bjork,et al. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[52] W. Kelemen,et al. Metamemory Cues and Monitoring Accuracy: Judging What You Know and What You Will Know , 2000 .
[53] T. O. Nelson,et al. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. , 2003, Acta psychologica.
[54] Caren M Rotello,et al. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[55] Michael J. Serra,et al. Do Older Adults Show Less Confidence in Their Monitoring of Learning? , 2008, Experimental aging research.
[56] Ian Begg,et al. Memory predictions are based on ease of processing , 1989 .
[57] Keith W Thiede,et al. Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[58] Katherine A. Rawson,et al. Second-Order Judgments About Judgments of Learning , 2005 .
[59] P. Rast,et al. Age Differences in the Underconfidence-With-Practice Effect , 2009, Experimental aging research.
[60] L. Hedges,et al. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .
[61] R. Rosenthal. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .
[62] T. O. Nelson. Consciousness and metacognition. , 1996 .
[63] N. Cowan. An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .
[64] J. Metcalfe,et al. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[65] Matthew G. Rhodes,et al. Monitoring memory errors: The influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning , 2011, Memory.
[66] T. O. Nelson,et al. Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution) , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[67] T. O. Nelson. Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .
[68] John Dunlosky,et al. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM). , 2004, Psychological methods.
[69] Asher Koriat,et al. Metacognition and Consciousness 1 Metacognition and Consciousness , 2006 .
[70] C. A. Weaver,et al. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[71] Janet Metcalfe,et al. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[72] E. Tulving,et al. Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. , 1970 .
[73] T. O. Nelson,et al. Memory Monitoring and the Delayed JOL Effect , 2008 .
[74] John Dunlosky,et al. Handbook of Metamemory and Memory , 2013 .
[75] T. O. Nelson,et al. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[76] Michael Diaz,et al. Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy. , 2008 .
[77] Bridgid Finn,et al. Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[78] Fredrik U. Jönsson,et al. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning. , 2005, Psychological review.
[79] J. Metcalfe. Metamemory: Theory and data. , 2000 .
[80] Larry V. Hedges,et al. Fixed-Effects Models , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[81] Asher Koriat,et al. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[82] E. Thompson,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness , 2007 .
[83] H. Weisberg. Sources of Bias , 2010 .
[84] Claudia M. Roebers,et al. Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[85] T. O. Nelson,et al. Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .
[86] C. Hertzog,et al. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval , 2011, Memory & Cognition.
[87] W. Dunlap,et al. Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .
[88] David J. Therriault,et al. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .
[89] Matthew G. Rhodes,et al. Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)? , 2010, Memory.
[90] Yoonhee Jang. THE EFFECT OF PRACTICE WITH TEST ON THE RELATIVE ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING , 2006 .
[91] K. Oberauer. Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[92] Asher Koriat,et al. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[93] T. O. Nelson,et al. Inhalation of 30% nitrous oxide impairs people's learning without impairing people's judgments of what will be remembered. , 1998, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.