Wind Speed Perception and Risk

Background How accurately do people perceive extreme wind speeds and how does that perception affect the perceived risk? Prior research on human–wind interaction has focused on comfort levels in urban settings or knock-down thresholds. No systematic experimental research has attempted to assess people's ability to estimate extreme wind speeds and perceptions of their associated risks. Method We exposed 76 people to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mph (4.5, 8.9, 13.4, 17.9, 22.3, and 26.8 m/s) winds in randomized orders and asked them to estimate wind speed and the corresponding risk they felt. Results Multilevel modeling showed that people were accurate at lower wind speeds but overestimated wind speeds at higher levels. Wind speed perceptions mediated the direct relationship between actual wind speeds and perceptions of risk (i.e., the greater the perceived wind speed, the greater the perceived risk). The number of tropical cyclones people had experienced moderated the strength of the actual–perceived wind speed relationship; consequently, mediation was stronger for people who had experienced fewer storms. Conclusion These findings provide a clearer understanding of wind and risk perception, which can aid development of public policy solutions toward communicating the severity and risks associated with natural disasters.

[1]  P. S. Jackson,et al.  The evaluation of windy environments , 1978 .

[2]  S. Brody,et al.  Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners , 2005 .

[3]  R. Stein.  HOW RISK PERCEPTIONS INFLUENCE EVACUATIONS FROM HURRICANES , 2011 .

[4]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[5]  D. Subramanian,et al.  How Risk Perceptions Influence Evacuations from Hurricanes and Compliance with Government Directives , 2013 .

[6]  Sarah Jordan,et al.  Evaluating and modelling the response of an individual to a sudden change in wind speed , 2008 .

[7]  Shuzo Murakami,et al.  New criteria for wind effects on pedestrians , 1981 .

[8]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[10]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Individual Actual or Perceived Property Flood Risk: Did it Predict Evacuation from Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina, 2003? , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  The effects of wind on people; New criteria based on wind tunnel experiments , 1976 .

[12]  W. H. Melbourne,et al.  Criteria for environmental wind conditions , 1978 .

[13]  G. Tobin.  Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning? , 1999 .

[14]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[15]  Marcel Bottema,et al.  A method for optimisation of wind discomfort criteria , 2000 .

[16]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[17]  J. Nezlek.  Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology , 2011 .

[18]  S. Cutter,et al.  Public orders and personal opinions: household strategies for hurricane risk assessment , 2000 .

[19]  R. Rayment,et al.  Measurements of wind drag on people standing in a wind tunnel , 1978 .

[20]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[21]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .