Gender and the Stratification of Colleges

It has been twenty-five years since the United States Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which banned discrimination in education based on sex (Chamberlain, 1988).(1) Since that time, women have made substantial progress in terms of access to higher education. Women now constitute the majority of associate and other two-year degree recipients, the majority of bachelor's degree recipients, about half of master's and professional degree recipients, and nearly 40% of doctoral degree recipients. In terms of sheer numbers of degrees, then, women have more than attained parity with men. On the other hand, women are segregated from men in the fields of study they pursue. Differences in this aspect of education narrowed during the late 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s but have stabilized since 1985. Female college graduates continue to trail their male counterparts in earnings (Jacobs, 1995, 1996a). Another important aspect of gender differentiation in higher education is the distribution of women and men across institutions. Several studies have suggested that women are not equally represented at top-tier institutions (Hearn, 1990; Persell, Catsambis, & Cookson, 1992; Davies & Guppy, 1997). In this article I assess whether women have attained parity with men in terms of graduation from elite colleges. I draw on comprehensive data on degrees obtained from all institutions awarding bachelor's degrees. I examine gender differences in average school standing as well as graduation from elite schools. I also examine whether women have made progress relative to men since 1970 with respect to college ranking. The Stratification of Colleges As enrollment in college becomes more common, competition for status shifts to obtaining a degree from an elite school. College ranking is associated with later-life earnings. In other words, those obtaining their degrees at higher status institutions earn more on average than those obtaining their degrees at less prestigious schools. Pascarella and Terenzini (1991) review studies in this area and do not resolve the question of whether graduates of elite schools do better because of the effect of the schools or because of the greater selectivity of students. However, more recent studies, which often include careful controls, provide an accumulating body of evidence that college ranking does indeed affect subsequent student outcomes (Behrman, Rosenzweig, & Taubman, 1996; Kingston & Smart, 1990; James, Absalam, Conaty, & To, 1989).(2) Economists refer to these as "college quality" effects. Sociologists have suggested that, in addition to greater technical skills, these earnings effects may represent greater social skills or social networks, or they may simply reflect status certification effects (Ishida, Spilerman, & Su, 1997; Lee & Brinton, 1996; Useem & Karabel, 1990; Kingston & Lewis, 1990; Coleman, 1988; Bourdieu & Passeron, 1977). No matter what interpretation we may place on these findings, if women do not obtain their degrees at schools of equal stature to those of men, then they will not garner the same benefits from their college education as their male counterparts. As bachelor's degrees become more common, one would expect the distinctions among bachelor's degree recipients to become ever more salient. Indeed, some evidence suggests that in recent years the importance of college standing has increased (Daniel, Black, & Smith, 1997a, 1997b). Gender Differences in College Standing Hearn (1990) and Persell et al. (1992) report that women trailed men in access to elite schools, based on an analysis of data on 1980 high-school seniors. Hearn reports that 45% of students at top institutions were female, compared with 40% in moderately selective and 51% in non-selective colleges, based on his analysis of the High School and Beyond data. (Hearn defined elite schools as those with average SAT scores above 1,176 in 1980. …

[1]  James C. Hearn Academic and Nonacademic Influences on the College Destinations of 1980 High School Graduates. , 1991 .

[2]  D. Karen The Politics of Class, Race, and Gender: Access to Higher Education in the United States, 1960-1986 , 1991, American Journal of Education.

[3]  J. Jacobs Gender and Academic Specialties: Trends among Recipients of College Degrees in the 1980s. , 1995 .

[4]  Mary C. Brinton,et al.  Elite Education and Social Capital: The Case of South Korea. , 1996 .

[5]  Jerry A. Jacobs,et al.  Gender Inequality and Higher Education , 1996 .

[6]  G. Becker A Treatise on the Family , 1982 .

[7]  Elizabeth M. King Women's Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits and Policies , 1997 .

[8]  A. Fishel,et al.  National politics and sex discrimination in education , 1977 .

[9]  J. Behrman,et al.  Individual Endowments, College Choice and Wages: Estimates Using Data on Female Twins , 1996 .

[10]  Michael Useem,et al.  Pathways to Top Corporate Management , 1986 .

[11]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Adult Enrollment and Educational Attainment , 1998 .

[12]  H. Wainer,et al.  Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. , 1992 .

[13]  Sheila S. Slaughter,et al.  Women's Higher Education in Comparative Perspective. , 1991 .

[14]  L. Lewis,et al.  The High Status Track , 1991 .

[15]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[16]  N. Cole,et al.  Gender and fair assessment , 1997 .

[17]  College Characteristics and the Wages of Young Women , 1996 .

[18]  David Riesman,et al.  The Academic Revolution. , 1969 .

[19]  R. Pollak,et al.  Do Parents Favor Boys , 1986 .

[20]  Earl Smith,et al.  Women and minorities in American professions , 1996 .

[21]  S. Spilerman,et al.  Educational credentials and promotion chances in Japanese and American organizations , 1997 .

[22]  D. Black,et al.  College Quality and the Wages of Young Men , 1997 .

[23]  Estelle James,et al.  College Quality and Future Earnings: Where Should You Send Your Child to College? , 1989 .

[24]  C. H. Persell Differential Asset Conversion: Class and Gendered Pathways to Selective Colleges. , 1992 .

[25]  Mariam K. Chamberlain,et al.  Women in Academe: Progress and Prospects , 1990 .

[26]  Richard Pearson,et al.  Women in science and engineering , 1985, Nature.

[27]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[29]  S. Schwager Educating Women in America , 1987, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[30]  Brian Powell,et al.  Sponsoring the Next Generation: Parental Willingness to Pay for Higher Education , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  James C. Hearn Emerging variations in postsecondary attendance patterns: An investigation of part-time, delayed, and nondegree enrollment , 1992 .

[32]  G. Kelly International Handbook of Women's Education , 1989 .

[33]  Brian Powell,et al.  Acquiring Capital for College: The Constraints of Family Configuration , 1989 .

[34]  J. Herbst Cross-Purposes in Education. (Book Reviews: And Sadly Teach. Teacher Education and Professionalization in American Culture.) , 1989 .

[35]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Reproduction in education, society and culture , 1970 .

[36]  S. Davies,et al.  Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education , 1997 .